Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: shri shah · Page 1 of about 561 results (0.148 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 05 2003

Jalgaon District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-05-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Act, 1961 - Sections 2(19); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 119 and 194A(3); Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 2(19)

Reported in : 2003(4)ALLMR966; 2004(2)BomCR88; [2004]265ITR423(Bom); 2003(4)MhLj353

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Shah, Senior Counsel and ;P.V. Barde, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 563 of 2003 and ;A.G. Talhar, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 2261 of 2003

B. B. Vagyani, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With consent of parties, taken up for final hearing forthwith.2. The Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act was enacted with a view to provide for orderly development of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 2003

The Jalgaon District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-05-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 2(19); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 119 and 194A(3)

Reported in : (2003)184CTR(Bom)343

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Shah, ;P.V. Barde and ;A.G. Talhar, Advs.

B.B. Vagyani, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith with consent of parties, taken up for final hearing forthwith.2. The Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act was enacted with a view to provide for orderly development of the co-operative...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 2004

Goverdhandas Mulchand Agrawal and ors. Vs. Bherulal Uderam Bagade and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-03-2004

Subject : CivilTenancy

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 108(O); Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13, 13(1) and 13(2)

Reported in : 2005(3)MhLj196

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Agrawal, Adv. for petitioners Nos. 1, 2-a to 2-d, 3 and 4

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the judgment and order dated 10-2-1987 in Civil Appeal No. 65 of 1984. The judgment under challenge affirms the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 07 1986

Roopa Vs. Rajasthan Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-07-1986

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 1986(2)WLN195

Suresh Chandra Agrawal, J.1. In this writ petition, the petitioner, Roopa, has challenged the Award (Annexure 4) dated 11th October, 1984 made by the Labour Court, Jaipur to the extent the Labour Court has denied back...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 1982

Abdul Ajij Puddan Ansari Vs. Jubedabai W/O Abdul Ajij and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-01-1982

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125(1) and 125(3)

Reported in : 1982(1)BomCR504

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Shah, Adv.;J.A. Barday, Adv.

M.L. Pandse, J.1. This is an application filed by the husband to challenge the legality of the order dated July 10, 1981 passed by the II Joint Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Dhule, and the order dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 1993

Harivilas Madhavprasad Ruia Vs. Viraf Ardeshir Udwadia and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-29-1993

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 104, 104(1), 105 and 106 - Order 39, Rule 2-A - Order 41 - Order 43

Reported in : AIR1994Bom38; 1994(1)BomCR366; (1993)95BOMLR592; 1993(2)MhLj1435

Advocate for Appellant : Navin B. Shah

1. By an order dated 27th February, 1992 the learned Judge of the Court of Small Causes, Bombay, made the notice partly absolute holding the petitioner guilty of flouting the order of injunction and also passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 1999

Shailesh Harinarayan Bajaj Vs. Creative Garments Limited and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-17-1999

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Presidency Towns Insolvancy Act, 1909 - Sections 9 and 90(5); Bombay Insolvancy Rules, 1910 - Rule 52-B(5); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 2000(1)BomCR146

Advocate for Appellant : N.H. Seerwai and ;A.A. Joglekar with ;S.S. Shah i/b ;M.& M. Legal Venture, Advs.;P.V. Shah and ;G.B. Kedia, Advs.

ORDERSmt. K.K. Baam, J.1. This Notice of Motion has been taken out on behalf of the applicant/Judgment Debtor praying that it may be held that the applicant has not committed any act of insolvency in Notice...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 1990

National Education and Information Films Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-01-1990

Subject : Customs

Acts : Central Excise Act; Customs Act - Sections 27; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1993LC237(Bombay); 1991(51)ELT216(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri D.J. Dalal, Adv., i/b.,;M/s. Dhruve Liladhar & Co.

Rule, returnable forthwith.Shri Shah waives service on behalf of the respondent.Heard counsel.1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, legality of order dated January 22, 1990 passed by Customs, Excise and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 15 1993

LyphIn Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-15-1993

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act - Sections 46

Reported in : 1993LC21(Bombay); 1993(66)ELT572(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Jerry Lewis and ;Shri W.N. Deshpande, Advs.

Pendse, J.1. The petitioner are a private limited company and on September 28, 1981, imported 1980 kgs. of D2- amino-1 Butane air. The petitioner initially filed bill of entry for home consumption but could not make...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 1990

H.N. Lakhani Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-14-1990

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 1990(2)BomCR594

Advocate for Appellant : Aspi Chinoy, ;Percy Gandhy and ;Vijay Rajput, Advs., i/b., N.G Pandya, Adv.

V.S. Kotwal, J.1 The point involved is quite short, though the field of debate has been expanded on account of certain interpretation that is sought to be put by learned Counsel for both sides. Narration of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial