Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: shri mohokar · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.032 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 27 2004

C.J. Patel Tobacco Products Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtr ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-27-2004

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Maharashtra Workmen's Minimum House Rent Allowance Act, 1983 - Sections 5 and 5(1); Beedi Workers Welfare Fund Act, 1976 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 4(3) and 4(4)

Reported in : 2005(1)MhLj572

Advocate for Appellant : S.V. Manohar and ;A.A. Naik, Advs. for Petitioner Nos. 1 and 3 to 10 and ;M.V. Mohokar, Adv. for Petitioner No. 2;V.S. Kukday, Adv.

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.1. Heard Shri Manohar, learned counsel for petitioner No . 1, Shri Mohokar, learned counsel for petitioner No. 2, Shri Sonare, AGP for respondent No. 1 and Shri Kukday, learned counsel for respondent No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 2015

Manohar and Others Vs. The Director of Vocational Education and Traini ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Oct-08-2015

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: (B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.) 1. All these petitioners are employees working with Shivaji Education Society at Amravati in its School imparting education in MCV Courses. The other respondents in writ petitions are State of Maharashtra,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2011

Pix Transmissions Limited Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Sep-21-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226, 227, 141; Industrial Disputes Act,1947 - Section 2 (k); Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Section 2 (h), 4 (1), 25, 11 (1), 27, 3 rw 5; Industrial Disputes Act, - Section 18 (3), 10, 12 (4) and (5) ; Contract Act - Section 23

Advocate for Appellant : Mr H.V. Thakur, Adv.

1. The petitioner-employer has filed this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India assailing the order of Reference dated 21.1.2010 passed by respondent no. 2 and referring the controversy to the Industrial...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 24 2012

Sadashiv S/O Bhimgauda Patil and Another Vs. Pro-interactive Services ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Jul-24-2012

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: (Smt. Vasanti A.Naik, J.) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The petition is heard finally with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The issue involved in this petition is as to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2012

Champalal S/O Chunnilal Paliwal, (Dead Through Lrs.) and Others Vs. th ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Aug-29-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Judgment: (B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.) By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 30.12.1991 passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nagpur holding that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2012

Champalal S/O Chunnilal Paliwal, (Dead Through Lrs.) and Others Vs. th ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Aug-29-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Judgment: (B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.) By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 30.12.1991 passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nagpur holding that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2009

Haribhau Pandurang Kubale Vs. Chanvim Engineering (P) Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-04-2009

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR861

Advocate for Appellant : M.V. Mohokar, Adv.

Dongaonkar S.R., J.1. Heard Shri Mohokar, Advocate for the petitioner and Shri Dandekar, Advocate for the respondent. Rule. Heard finally with the consent of the parties.2. The petitioner is challenging the interim order passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2016

Nitin Vs. Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Limited

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Apr-20-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Mohokar

Oral Judgment: (B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.) 1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of Shri Mohokar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Mohgaonkar, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. Shri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 2007

Jahangir Yusuf Qureshi and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-04-2007

Subject : Election

Acts : Bombay Village Panchayat Act, 1958 - Sections 145(1A)

Reported in : 2007(6)ALLMR886; 2008(3)MhLj437

Advocate for Appellant : B.G. Kulkarni, Adv.

A.H. Joshi, J.1. Rule. By consent made returnable forthwith.2. Heard learned Advocate Shri B. G. Kulkarni for the petitioners, learned A.G.P. Shri P. D. Kothari, for respondents No. 1, 3 and 4, learned Advocate Shri P....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial