Advanced Search Results
Bajaj Auto Limited and Another Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Another
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Mar-02-2012
Land Acquisition
For the Appellants : Shri A. Hidayatullah, Sr. Advocate with Makarand Joshi, Advocate for the assessee-company. For the Respondents : Ms. D.M. Durando, Dy. Commissioner (AR).
Ashok Jindal: Appeal No. C/807/2003 has been filed by M/s. Bajaj Auto Limited (BAL) and appeal No. C/887/2003 has been filed by Revenue. M/s. BAL filed the appeal for denial of DEPB claim in the impugned...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.C. Edwards and Co. Pvt. Ltd Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Feb-29-1984
MRTP
(1984)(17)ELT435TriDel
Shri. A. Hidayatullah
1. The question for decision in this appeal to the Tribunal is whether 528 Fare Meters of the value of Rs. 4,31,400/- cleared by the appellants during December, 1979 and January, 1980 for export to Ceylon...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBritannia Industries Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Nov-18-1988
Land Acquisition
(1989)(21)LC185Tri(Delhi)
1. The Britannia Biscuit Co. Ltd., had filed a revision application to the Joint Secretary, Government of India, Department of Revenue and Banking, New Delhi being aggrieved from order-in-appeal Nos. 1976/76 and 1977/76 dated 17th December,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
AshwIn Vanaspati Industries Pvt. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Aug-12-1991
Excise
(1992)(59)ELT175TriDel
1. This appeal is fifed against the Order-in-Original passed by the Collector of Central Excise and Customs, Vadodara confirming the demand raised in the show cause notice dt. 28-1-1985 to the extent of Rs. 3,39,463.35 Ps....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of C. Excise Vs. Procter and Gamble India Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Jul-24-1995
Land Acquisition
(1995)LC229Tri(Delhi)
1. Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad has filed this application for condonation of delay in filing his appeal against the order-in-appeal No. 44/93(H)C.E., dated 12-3-1993 passed by Collector of Customs & Central Excise (Appeals), Hyderabad. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChemifine and ors. Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jan-21-1984
MRTP
(1984)(18)ELT336Tri(Mum.)bai
1. The appeal No. 739/83 is directed against the order S/10-13/83-C dated 18-3-1983 passed by the Additional Collector of Customs, Bombay by which he ordered confiscation of the Import of goods, Tetracyciine Urea Complex, under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskColgate Palmolive (i) Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Nov-15-1993
Service Tax
(1995)LC335Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This is an appeal against the Order-in-Appeal No. A-57/93 [V-2A(MV)/9/93/598] dated 19-4-1993 of Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Pune.2. The facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of toilet...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaturelle Health Products Pvt. Vs. Collr. of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Oct-17-1995
Excise
(1996)(81)ELT578TriDel
1. The issue for decision in this appeal is whether the medicated cough drops and throat drops manufactured by the appellants for M/s. Procter & Gamble (India) Limited and marketed under the brand named 'Vicks' are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskApollo Tyres Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. and Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jun-10-1998
Excise
(1998)(62)ECC350
1. Since we find that the issue--classification of rubberised/calendered dipped fabrics involved in these appeals is covered by precedent decisions of the Tribunal, after hearing both the sides, we grant stay and with the consent of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskApollo Tyres Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Jun-23-1998
Excise
(1999)(108)ELT247Tri(Mum.)bai
1. Since we find that the issue - Classification of rubberised/calendered dipped fabrics involved in these appeals is covered by precedent decisions of the Tribunal, after hearing both the sides, we grant stay and with, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »