Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s rangarajan · Page 1 of about 324 results (0.198 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 29 1991

M/S. Sabson (India) Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporati ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-29-1991

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 14, 14(2), 17, 21, 30, 31, 33 and 40 ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1906 - Sections 16

Reported in : AIR1992Mad282; (1991)IIMLJ211

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. T.S. Rangarajan, Adv.

ORDER1. O.P. NO. 531 of 1987 was filed by Sabson (India) Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore against Neyveli Lignite Corporation and Mr. Justice V. V. Raghavan and Mr. M. G. Balasubramaniam (arbitrators) under Sections 14(2) and 17 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 13 2016

Phantom Films Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Central Board of Film Certific ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-13-2016

Subject : Miscellaneous

Oral Judgment: (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.) 1. Rule. Respondents waive service. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith. 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek a writ of certiorari...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 12 1983

Smita Conductors Pvt. Ltd., Bombay and anr. Vs. Madhya Pradesh State E ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-12-1983

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 300A

Reported in : AIR1984MP44

Advocate for Appellant : S. Rangarajan, ;R.P. Verma, ;V. Mohan and ;Deepak Verma, Advs.

C.P. Sen, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India amongst others praying for striking down of Clause 4 (b) of the contract entered into by the parties regarding supply of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 05 2016

S. Tamilselvan and Others Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by th ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-05-2016

Subject : MRTP

(Prayers: W.P. No.1215 of 2015 : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Declaration of the decision of the Peace Committee Meeting held on 12.1.2015 at Namakkal,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2025

X Corp vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-24-2025

Reserved on : 29.07.2025 RPronounced on : 24.09.2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.7405 OF 2025 (GM -...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 2015

Prem Mardi Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-16-2015

Subject : Miscellaneous

1. In these days of challenge to the bans imposed by the Governmental and Municipal Agencies on various aspects of life being brought before the Courts by the Advocates community, the petitioner, belonging to the same...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 2019

Indian Potash Ltd. Vs.media Contents and Communication Services (India ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-02-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sudhir K. Makkar, Ms. Meenakshi Singh, Ms. Saumya Gupta, Mr. Abhishek Chaudhary

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d May, 2019 10th April, 2019 CS(OS) No.1717/2007 INDIAN POTASH LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sudhir K. Makkar, Sr. Adv. with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2001

Khushwant Singh and anr. Vs. Maneka Gandhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-18-2001

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 19(2), 21, 32, 51A, 104, 105 and 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2, 3 and 4; Official Secrets Act, 1923; Evidence Act - Sections 74

Reported in : AIR2002Delhi58

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv. and; Mr. Shridhar, Chitale, Adv

ORDERSanjay Kishan Kaul, J. 1. 'He that publishes a book runs a very great hazard, since nothing can be more impossible than to compose one that may secure that approbation of every reader' - rightly observed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 2005

Ms. A. Arulmozhi Vs. the Govt. of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-05-2005

Subject : Media and Communication

Acts : Cinematograph Act, 1952 - Sections 5A, 5B, 5B(1), 5B(2), 6 and 7; ;Tamil Nadu (Compulsory Censorship of Film Publicity Materials) Act - 1987; ;Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 292, 336, 353 and 354; Constitution of India - Article 19(1) and 19(2)

Reported in : (2005)3MLJ497

Advocate for Appellant : V. Ramasubramanian, Adv.

M. Karpagavinagayam, J.1. Tamil feature film 'New', produced by Annai Mari Madha Creations, third respondent herein, was released for public exhibition in the second week of July, 2004, throughout Tamil Nadu.2. Ms. Arulmozhi, an advocate practising...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 2016

The Secretary, The Karnataka Government, Bangalore Vs. Susheelamma, Si ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-05-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: These Writ Appeals are filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act praying to set aside the order passed in the Writ Petition No.11518/2008(LA-RES) dated 10.11.2010.) 1. The above appeals are preferred praying...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial