Advanced Search Results

M/S Krbl Ltd Vs. M/S Pk Overseas Pvt Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 (CPC) - Section 104 read with Orders 43, 39 Rules 1, 2; Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Sections 134, 135, 27(2); Copyright Act, 1957 - Section 51

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.K. Bansal, Adv.

1. By this appeal filed under section 104 read with Order 43 rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 the appellant seeks to challenge the order dated 27.8.2011 whereby the interim relief under Order...

Event and Entertainment Management Association Vs. Union of India and ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Societies Registration

Acts : Societies Registration Act, 1860; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 33, 31, 36, 35, 18; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1)(g); Copyright Rules, 1958 - Rule 14H

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.K. Bansal; Mr. Santosh Kumar; Mr. Vikas Khera, Advs.

25.05.2011 Introduction 1. The prayer in this writ petition is for a direction to the Union of India, Ministry of Human Resource Development (HRD) to frame appropriate and objective standards towards the determination and levying of...

P.P. Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. P.P. Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights Civil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Trade Mark Act, 1999 - Sections 2, 17(1), 28, 29(5), 31(1) and 35; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2009(41)PTC217(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Bansal, Adv

S. Muralidhar, J.IA No. 132 of 2005 in CS (OS) No. 19/2005IA No. 4048 of 2008 in CS (OS) No. 604/20081. These are applications under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC for seeking interim injunction...

Avtar Singh Vs. K.M. Products and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Mark Act, 1958 - Sections 28(3), 31 and 33

Reported in : 1996(26)ARBLR90(Delhi); 64(1996)DLT68

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Bansal and; M.M. Singh, Advs

K. Ramamoorthy, J. (1) The plaintiff has filed the suit against two defendants for injunction restraining the defendants from dealing in Ribbons and other allied and cognate goods under the trade mark Tota Maina label from...

Bishan Singh Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (2000)124PLR496

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Bansal, Adv.

ORDERK.K. Srivastava, J. 1. The petitioner was enrolled in the Haryana Police as a Constable and was appointed on 29-8-1977. In September. 1992, he was posted at T-Point barrier, Ladwa Road, Indri, district Karnal. Shri Balwant...

izuk Chemical Works Vs. Babu Ram Dharam Prakash

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trademarks Act, 1999 - Sections 2(1), 12, 28, 29(5) and 127; Copyright Act; Trade Marks Act, 1940 - Sections 10; Trade and Merchandise Act, 1958 - Sections 29; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : LC2007(3)8; 2007(35)PTC28(Del)

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Bansal, Adv

Gita Mittal, J.1. By this judgment, I propose to decide I.A. No. 2516/2006 filed by the plaintiff under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure in the suit filed by it...

Smt. Santosh Phogat Vs. the State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1999)123PLR231

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Bansal, Adv.

Harjit Singh Bedi, J. 1. The petitioner, a Nursing Sister, is presently employed in the Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Science, Rohtak (hereinafter called 'the PGI'). She was admitted to the PGI...

Prayag Chand Agarwal Vs. M/S Mayur Plastics Industries

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and (4); Designs Act, 1911

Reported in : 72(1998)DLT1; 1998(44)DRJ667

Advocate for Appellant : : Mr. S.K. Bansal, Adv

ORDERVijender Jain, J.1. This order will dispose of plaintiff's application (IA 3830/97) under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC for interim injunction as well as defendant's application (IA 4408/97) under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC...

Ratna Sagar Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Trisea Publications and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Media and CommunicationIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : 1997(1)ARBLR30(Delhi); 64(1996)DLT539

Advocate for Appellant : Ajay Sawhney,; K.G. Bansal and; S.K. Bansal, Advs

K. Ramamoorthy, J. (1) The Applicant M/s. Ratna Sagar Private Limited has filed the suit claiming the following reliefs : '(i) For an order for perpetual injunction restraining the defendants, their agents, assigns, employees, successors, servants,...

Berjesh Goyal and anr. Vs. Daily Foods (India)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 119 - Order 3, Rules 1 and 4 - Order 41, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Article 227; High Court Rules - Rule 3

Reported in : AIR2009Delhi118

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Bansal, Adv

ORDERManmohan, J.1. By the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks setting aside of Order dated 24th January, 2007 passed by learned Additional District Judge in C.S.(O.S.) No. 400 of...