Advanced Search Results

Asha Ram and Ors Vs. Panna Lal

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.G. Ojha

S.B. CIVIL SECOND APPEAL No.202/2011. Ganpat Ram & Ors. Vs. Panna Lal .. Judgment, Tuesday, dated 17.11.2015. 1/6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. :: JUDGMENT :: S.B. CIVIL SECOND APPEAL No.202/2011....

Madhu (Smt.) Vs. Smt. Bhanwari and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Election

Acts : Rajasthan Panchayati Raj (Election) Rules, 1994 - Rule 49(6), 80, 82, 85 and 86; Representation of Peoples Act, 1951 - Sections 97; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC),1908 - Sections 151; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), - Order 14, Rule 2 and 2(2)

Reported in : RLW2004(1)Raj417; 2004(1)WLC11

Advocate for Appellant : S.G. Ojha, Adv.

H.R. Panwar, J.1. These appeals are directed against order of the learned Single Judge dated 27th September, 2002 passed in Smt. Bhanwari v. Smt. Madhu and Ors. (1). Singh both these appeals arise out of one...

Laxminarayan Vs. Dr. Ganeshmal

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act - Sections 383; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 195

Reported in : AIR2005Raj105

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Acharya and; S.G. Ojha, Advs.

ORDERN.P. Gupta, J.1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant, against the Order of the learned District Judge, Churu, passed on the application filed on 25-8-1992, under Section 383 of the Indian Succession Act, revoking...

Mapi Kumari Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Education

CWP No.8952/2013 Alongwith one connected matter 1 41 D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8952/2013 Mapi Kumari versus The State of Rajasthan & ORS.And D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.9712/2013 Bhaga Ram versus The State of Rajasthan & ORS.DATE OF ORDER:...

Rameshwar @ Ramu Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Criminal

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. JUDGMENT Rameshwar @ Ramu vs. State of Rajasthan D.B. Criminal Appeal No.595/2006 against the judgment dated 31.5.2006 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.1,...

Ram Prakash Mirdha Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Constitution

S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1171/2014 Ram Prakash Mirdha versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.Order dt: 23/04/2014 1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.1171/2014 Ram Prakash Mirdha versus State...

Anand Kumar and Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1995Raj281; 1995(3)WLC183; 1995(1)WLN477

Advocate for Appellant : Manindra Singh, Adv. for M.C.I

ORDERN.K. Jain, J. 1. Since both the writ petitions raise common question of fact and law, they are being disposed of by this common order. 2. In both the writ petitions, petitioners seek directions to give...

inder Singh Bhati Through His Lrs. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Reported in : RLW2008(3)Raj2410

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Bhandari, Mr. L.M. Lodha

Vineet Kothari, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by the legal representatives Smt. Chandra Devi and others of Shri Indra Singh Bhati, who was son of Keshav Dev Bhati, whose land in question was acquired...

Bajrang Lal and Co. and ors. Vs. Rajasthan Financial Corp. and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2000(3)WLC381; 2000(3)WLN431

B.J. Shethna, J.Whether the Rajasthan Financial Corporation (for short 'the RFC') being a disbursing authority is entitled to charge interest on a subsidy amount for the period from payment of subsidy amount to the petitioner till...

Smt. Kamla and anr. Vs. Ramesh Chandra and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : 2002(4)WLC321; 2002(5)WLN260

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Suresh Shrimalee

B.S. Chauhan, J.1. This revision has been preferred against the order dated 25.9.2000, by which the learned trial Court has refused to try the preliminary issue as to whether the non-petitioner/plaintiff has paid the required court...