Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: s a mehta · Page 1 of about 1,207 results (0.250 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 17 1990

Dr. Bhika Lal JaIn and ors. Vs. University of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-17-1990

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1990(2)WLN130

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. S.M. Mehta

N.C. Sharma, J.1. This writ petition under Article. 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by Dr Bhika Lal Jain, Dr. Shiv Sharma, Dr. Sudhakar Misra and Dr. T.N. Bhardwaj praying that the selection...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 1990

Special Land Acquisition Officer, Broach Vs. Punjabhai Narshibhai Pate ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-07-1990

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23

Reported in : AIR1991Guj161; (1991)1GLR482

Advocate for Appellant : S.T. Mehta, Adv.

S.D. Dave, J.1. This common judgment shall govern the disposal of these 10 appeals arising out of the awards pronounced by the Ld. Assistant Judge, Broach dated 2510-1978, awarding the additional compensation in 10 L.A.R. Cases...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2003

Barot Jignesh Lakshmansinh Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-10-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 5; Recruitment Rules, 1998; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(4), 16, 16(4), 226, 315, 320, 320(1), 320(3) and 330 to 342; Indian Penal Code; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : (2003)2GLR1727; (2003)2GLR807

Advocate for Appellant : Girish Patel,; S.N. Mehta,; Yatin Oza,;

Jayant Patel, J.1. In all this group of petitions the facts are interconnected and to some extent the issues involved are also interconnected and therefore they are being dealt with by this common judgment.2. The short...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 12 1979

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. S. Zoraster and Co.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-12-1979

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10(2)

Reported in : [1982]133ITR559(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Mehta, Adv.

Dwarka Prasad, J.1. This is a reference made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, 'B ', under Section 66(2) of the Indian I.T. Act, 1922 (hereinafter referred to as ' the Act '), by which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 2006

Eicher Motors Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-06-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 43B and 256(1); Finance Act, 2006

Reported in : [2009]315ITR312(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : H.Y. Mehta and ;S.H. Mehta, Advs.

ORDERA.M. Sapre, J.1. This is an IT reference made under Section 256(1) of the IT Act to this Court at the instance of assessee by the Tribunal to answer following questions of law said to arise...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 1971

Deb Sadhan Roy Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-07-1971

Subject : Criminal

Acts : West Bengal (Prevention of Violent Activities) Act, 1970 Sections 12 and 13; Constitution of India - Articles 22(4) and 32

Reported in : AIR1972SC1924; 1973CriLJ446; (1972)1SCC308; [1972]2SCR787

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Mehta, Adv

P. Jaganmohan Reddy, J.1. This petition under Article 32 challenges the detention under the West Bengal (Prevention of Violent Activities) Act, 1970 (hereinafter called the Act'), It may be mentioned that this and other Writ Petitions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 1996

Jaipur Electro Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-08-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37 and 37(1)

Reported in : [1997]223ITR535(Raj)

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Mehta, Senior Adv. and; Sonal Mehta, Adv.

M.A.A. Khan, J.1. As directed by this court under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur (for short 'the Tribunal'), has referred the following question...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1960

Mahomed Tayoob Daruwala Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-21-1960

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 - Sections 2(10), 2(18), 13, 14, 16(4), 16(5) and 45; ;Sales Tax Rules, 1954 - Rules 10 and 21; Sales Tax Act

Reported in : (1960)62BOMLR657; [1960]11STC612(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : S.P. Mehta and ;Y.P. Trivedi, Advs.

S.T. Desai, J.1. This petition for a writ of certiorari in a case arising under the Sales Tax Act has been argued before us by Mr. S. P. Mehta, learned counsel for the assessee, with his...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 1975

R.S. Ramachandran Vs. Contempt Proceedings Initiated by the Court on I ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-11-1975

Subject : CriminalContempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Court Act, 1971 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : ILR1975Delhi868

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Dalal and; S.N. Mehta, Advs

S. Rangarajan, J.(1) The respondent (R. S. Ramachandran). Editor of a Weekly called 'Crusader', not only wrote a letter to the Registrar of this Court on 3rd June 1974 but also published the contents of that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 17 1982

The State of Gujarat Vs. Janta Pauva Factory and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-17-1982

Subject : Civil

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 15(2); Gujarat Rice Procurement (Levy) Order, 1966; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 91; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80

Reported in : AIR1983Guj64; (1983)1GLR378

Advocate for Appellant : S.T. Mehta, Asst. Government Pleader

S.L. Talati, J.These five appeals arise out of five different suits filed in court of Civil Judge (S. D.), Navsari and the common questions of facts and law arise in these matters and, therefore, these five...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial