Advanced Search Results
Smt. Shraddha Kumari Vs. Lucknow University and ors.
Allahabad
Apr-26-1984
ServiceConstitution
Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act (President's Act), 1973 - Sections 21(1), 21(8) and 49; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1985All71
S.D. Singh and ;Robin Mitra, Advs.
K.N. Goyal, J.1. The petitioner is Head of the Department and Dean of the Faculty of Law in the Lucknow University since July, 1981. The Deanship rotates every three years. She had earlier also held this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohammed Fekoo Mohammed Yusuf Vs. Shree Krishna Woollen Mills Pvt. Ltd ...
Mumbai
Feb-08-2001
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33C(2); Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 73; Constitution of India - Article 226
2001(3)ALLMR434; 2001(4)BomCR280; (2001)4BOMLR567; [2001(89)FLR393]; (2001)ILLJ1363Bom; 2001(3)MhLj492
Apurva Kaiwar, Adv., i/b., Gayatri Singh
ORDERR. J. Kochar, J.1. The facts and background reflected in this petition are shocking. It also indicates how the representative union under the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 in the industry of respondent No. 1 has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFaujdar Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Aug-20-1996
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226
(1997)1UPLBEC48
R.S. Pande, Adv.
G.P. Mathur, J.1. This writ petition has been filed praying that a writ of mandamus be issued commanding the respondent to issue appointment order in favour of the petitioner for the post of Forester in pursuance...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Virendra Nath Rai Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Sep-13-1996
Service
(1997)1UPLBEC67
R.S. Pande and ;P.C. Agarwal, Advs.
S. Dikshit, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if this writ petition is disposed of finally at this stage.3. The petitioner was working as Junior Engineer in Tubewell Sub-Division-I,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Judge, Ii Labour Court Vs. Shri R.S. Pande and Another
Mumbai
Jan-23-1998
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 12; Constitution of India - Article 143
1998BomCR(Cri)568; 1998CriLJ1892; [1998(79)FLR625]; 1998(1)MhLj877
C.U. Singh and ;Ms. Shobha Gopal, Advs. and ;R.L. Patil, Addl. P.P.
ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. The question which we are called upon to decide in this application is whether respondent No. 1 - R.S. Pande, is guilty of an offence punishable under section 12 of Contempt of Courts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadhur Courier Services Vs. Dr. R.S. Pande
Madhya Pradesh
Aug-16-2002
Consumer
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1) and 14(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227
2003(2)MPHT45; 2003(2)MPLJ392
V.P. Nema, Adv.
ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the orders passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Jabalpur, State Consumer DisputesRedressal Commission, Bhopal and National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi, respectively contained in (P-4),...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›