Advanced Search Results
Kumaresan vs State Rep by the Inspector of Police
Chennai
Apr-02-2025
in 1IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 02.04.2025 THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in Kumaresan ...Petitioner/Petitioner/A1 Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Coimbatore. (Crime No.365...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKumaresan vs the State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by, the Inspector of Police,
Chennai
Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.02.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Kumaresan ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Inspector of Police Coimbatore (Crime No.365 of 2024) ... Respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Service Tax Vs. Ernst and Young Pvt Ltd
Delhi
Feb-25-2014
Service Tax
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CEAC122013 Reserved on:3. d December, 2013 Date of Decision:25. h February, 2014 % COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX ..... Appellant Through Ms. Sonia Sharma, Sr. Standing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
i.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Madras
Supreme Court of India
Jul-15-2004
Excise
2005(100)ECC261; 2004(171)ELT149(SC); (2004)12SCC297
R. Narain,; Sonu Bhatnagar,; Ajay Agarwal and;
ORDERArijit Pasayat, J.1. This Appeal is against the Order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as 'CEGAT') dated 1st August, 1997. The Appellants buy duty paid Aluminum Foil,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGodfrey Philips India Limited Vs. Union of India
Mumbai
Aug-31-1995
Excise
1996(85)ELT242(Bom)
Mr. F.S. Nariman, Senior Adv., ;Mr. S. Ganesh, ;Mr. N.H. Seervaj, ;Mr. D.B. Engineer, ;Mr. R. Narain and ;Mr. A. Sagar, Advs., i/b.,; M/s. Crawford Bayley & Co.
Shah, C.J.1. To the Petitioner No. 1, Godfrey Philips India Limited, notices to show cause-cum-demand were issued under Section 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), that they are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsian Paints India Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Supreme Court of India
Mar-23-1988
Excise
Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 35L; Sales Tax Act
AIR1988SC1087; 1988(16)ECC172; 1988(35)ELT3(SC); JT1988(2)SC8; 1988(1)SCALE628; (1988)2SCC470; [1988]3SCR339; [1988]70STC38(SC); 1988(2)LC104(SC)
K.K. Venugopal,; R. Narain,; S. Ganesh,;
Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.1. In this appeal under Section 35L of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter called 'the Act'), the question involved is whether 'Decoplast' manufactured by the Asian Paints India Ltd., the appellant...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Aluminium Cables Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana
Supreme Court of India
Apr-02-1976
Sales Tax
Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(2A)
AIR1976SC1711; (1976)4SCC27; [1976]3SCR992; [1976]38STC108(SC); 1976(8)LC455(SC)
R.S. Desai,; P.C. Bhartari,; R.Narain,;
M.H. Beg, J.1. This appeal by special leave is on the question whether the appellant is exempt from inter-State tax on the sales of poles and cables to Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking by reason of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPieco Electronics and Electricals Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise ...
Supreme Court of India
Oct-24-1996
Excise
Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931 - Sections 2, 3 and 4; Central Excises Act, 1944
1997(57)ECC245; 1996(87)ELT577(SC); JT1997(10)SC368; 1996(7)SCALE719; (1997)2SCC220; [1996]Supp7SCR664
M.S. Ganesh,; R. Narain,; S. Narain and;
S.P. Bharucha, J.1. This appeal relates to the Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931.2. The appellants manufacture plastic piece parts such as radio cabinets, knobs, etc. The plastic piece parts fell within the scope of Entry...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan Ciba Geigy Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-20-2002
MRTP
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 36A, 36A(1) and 55
2003(1)ALLMR(SC)741; JT2002(9)SC470; (2003)1SCC134; [2003]41SCL104(SC); 2003(1)LC15(SC)
R. Narain, Adv. for;J.B.D. & Co
S.B. Sinha, J.1. The substantial question of law involved in this appeal under Section 55 of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act. 1969 ('The act') is whether under Section 36A of the Act, (as it...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskColgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. Vs. M.R.T.P. Commission and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-20-2002
MRTP
Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 36A and 36A(3)
AIR2003SC317; 2003(1)ALLMR(SC)773; (2003)2CALLT28(SC); JT2002(9)SC464; (2003)1SCC119; [2003]41SCL98(SC); 2003(1)LC31(SC)
Ashok H. Desai, Sr. Adv.,; R. Narain,; Aditya Narain and;
S.B. Sinha, J.1. Interpretation of Section 36A of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 ('the M.R.T.P. Act') is in question in this batch of appeals which arise out of the judgments and orders passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »