Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: p v shetty · Page 1 of about 67 results (0.204 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 21 2008

Commissioner of Income Tax, Ahmedabad Vs. Sarabhai Holdings Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-21-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 209(1), 209(2), 209(3), 209(5), 210, 212, 215, 271(1), 273(2) and 274

Reported in : [2008]307ITR89(SC); JT2008(12)SC464; 2008(14)SCALE454; (2009)1SCC28

Advocate for Appellant : P.V. Shetty, Sr. Adv.,; Arunav Patnaik and; Lakshmi Iyengar

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. This Judgment will dispose of two Appeals, they being Civil Appeal Nos. 482 of 2003 and 483 of 2003. These Appeals are filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Ahmedabad (hereinafter referred to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2018

Smt. h.s. Brunda Vs. State by Inspector of Police

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-20-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

:1. : R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF APRIL, 2018 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100 OF2010C/W. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.104 OF2010CRIMINAL APPEAL No.100/2010 BETWEEN SMT. H.S....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2025

Dr S Chandrakala vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-17-2025

Reserved on : 18.12.2024Pronounced on : 17.03.2025 RIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.24360 OF 2024 (GM -...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 31 2009

N.A. Khan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-31-2009

Subject : Civil

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Manish Pitale

ORDER1. Leave granted.2. By this appeal, which has been filed by way of a Special Leave Petition, the appellant has challenged rejection of his writ petition and Review Petition filed before the High Court of Delhi...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2013

Mr. Justice Chandrashekaraiah (Retd.) Vs. Janekere C. Krishna and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-11-2013

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 - Sections 32(a)(b)

Reported in : 2013(1)SCJ513; 2013(1)KLT51(SN); AIR2013SCW706; AIR2013SC726

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. Leave granted.2. The sentinel issue that has come up for consideration in these appeals is whether the views expressed by the Chief Justice of the High Court of Karnataka has got primacy while...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2013

Mr.Justice Chandrashekaraiah (Retd.) Vs. Janekere C. Krishna and ors. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-11-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs.197-199 OF 201.[Arising out of SLP (Civil) NOs.15658-15660 OF 2012]. Mr. Justice Chandrashekaraiah (Retd.) .. Appellant Versus Janekere C. Krishna & Ors. etc. .....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 1993

The Karnataka Contract Labour and Transport Co-op. Society Ltd. and Ot ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-01-1993

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 31A(1) and 299; Food Corporation of India Act, 1964 - Sections 3; Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 - Sections 2; I.D. Act, 1947; Contract Labour Act, 1970 - Sections 16 and 18; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Employees Provident Fund/ Miscellaneous Act, 1952; Punjab Co-operative Society Act, 1961

Reported in : AIR1994Kant147; ILR1993KAR3417; 1993(4)KarLJ472

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Garg, Sr. Adv., ;D. Leelakrishnan, ;P. Ganapathy Bhat and ;A. Mahabaleswar Bhat, Advs.

ORDERS. B. Majmudar, C. J.1. These fourWrit Appeals and five Writ Petitions raise common questions of law and fact and hence they were heard together by consent of learned Advocates of respective parties and are being...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 2007

Sarojamma W/O Narasaiah Vs. K.M. Venkatesh

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-13-2007

Subject : CivilTenancy

Acts : Karnataka Small Causes Courts Act, 1964 - Sections 2(3), 8, 9 and 16 - Schedule - Articles 1 to 40; Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 - Sections 111; Transfer of Property Act; Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 67; Karnataka Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act - Sections 41(2); Bombay Rent Act - Sections 28, 43 and 45; Evidence Act - Sections 116; Karnataka Rent Control Act - Sections 3; Provincial Small Causes Court Act - Sections 23 - Schedule - Articles 7, 8 and 31; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(12) and 9 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 20, Rule 12 - Order 50

Reported in : ILR2007KAR3309;

Advocate for Appellant : Pradeep Naik K. Adv.

ORDERS.R. Bannurmath, J.1. At the request of the learned Single Judge, large number of Civil Revision Petition have been referred to this Bench by the directions of the Hon'ble Chief Justice.2. Though the referral request of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2013

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. M/S. Vijaya Leasing Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-01-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Altaf Ahmad

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7141 OF 200.Bangalore Development Authority …Appellant VERSUS M/s Vijaya Leasing Ltd. & Ors. …Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.7142 OF 200.State of Karnataka & Anr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 2008

Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras Vs. Ponni Sugars and Chemicals Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-16-2008

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80P(1) and 80P(2)

Reported in : [2008]306ITR392(SC); 2008(12)SCALE570; 2008(9)SCC337

S.H. Kapadia, J.1. Leave granted.2. In the above batch of civil appeals, based on the arguments addressed before us, we are mainly concerned with the following two questions, namely:(i) Whether the incentive subsidy received by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial