Advanced Search Results

N.D.R. Israni Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 33

Reported in : 2008(2)ARBLR410(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : P.C. Markanda, Sr. Adv. and; Naresh Markanda, Adv

Gita Mittal, J.1. By this judgment, I propose to dispose of the objections under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 filed on 9th July, 1998 by the Delhi Development Authority to the award...

Subhash Projects and Marketing Limited Vs. the Deputy Commissioner and ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 12, 13 and 14

Advocate for Appellant : P.C. Markanda (Sr.), G.N. Sahewalla, R. Markanda, D. Senapati and A. Jallan, Advs.

Ranjan Gogoi, J.1. All the writ petitions having raised common question of law on identical facts were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.2. The writ petitioner, Subhash Projects and...

M.N. Arora Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20

Reported in : 1988(1)ARBLR348(Delhi); 35(1988)DLT70

Advocate for Appellant : P.C. Markanda and; M.L. Jain, Advs

N.C. Kochhar, J.(1) Mr. M.L. Jain, the learned counsel for the respondent/ D.D A. does not oppose this petition under section 20 of the Arbitration Act in regard to the disputes mentioned in para 5 of...

Spm Engineers Ltd. Vs. Guwahati Municipal Corporation

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11(6)

Advocate for Appellant : P.C. Markanda, A.K. Goswami and A. Talukdar, Advs.

R.S. Mongia, J.1. Heard Mr. P.C. Markanda, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. H, Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.2. This order of mine will dispose of Arbitration Petitions Nos. 17/2001; 18/2001 and 19/2001....

Spm Engineers Ltd. Vs. Guwahati Municipal Corporation

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Advocate for Appellant : P.C. Markanda, A.K. Goswami and A. Talukdar, Advs.

R.S.Mongia, C.J. 1. Heard Mr. P.C. Markanda, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. H. Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. This order of mine will dispose of Arbitration Petitions Nos. 17/2001, 18/2001 and...

M/s Arif Azim Co. Ltd. Vs. M/s Aptech Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : R. SATHISH __

REPORTABLE2024INSC155IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION No.29 OF2023M/S ARIF AZIM CO. LTD. …PETITIONER VERSUS M/S APTECH LTD. …RESPONDENT JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.: For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided...

Gas Authority of India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Keti Construction (i) Ltd. an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11(6), 16, 16(5), 34, 34(2) and 37; Arbitration Act, 1940; Constitution of India - Article 16 and 16(3)

Reported in : 2007(2)ARBLR323(SC); 2007(3)AWC2802(SC); 2007(4)CTC435; JT2007(6)SC581; 2007(4)MhLj441; (2007)5MLJ1251(SC); 2007MPLJ458(SC); 2007(7)SCALE98; (2007)5SCC38; [2007] 6 SCR 439

Advocate for Appellant : Mohan Parasaran, ASG,; Ghanshyam and; Devendra Singh, Ad

G.P. Mathur, J. Leave granted. 2. This appeal, by special leave, has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 7.12.2004 of a Division Bench of Delhi High Court by which the appeal filed by M/s...

Traxpo Enterprises Pvt. Ltd Vs. Pec Limited and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Kuljeet Rawal, Mr. Jagjit Singh

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:17. 12.2013 + W.P.(C) 7918/2013 and CM No.16777/2013 (stay) TRAXPO ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Kuljeet Rawal and Mr Jagjit Singh,...

Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. Vs.deepak Cables (India) Limited ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Tushar Mehta, Ms. Manmeet

$~30 * + POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 6/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASG with Ms. Manmeet versus Singh & Ms....

M/S. Udupi Power Corporation Limited M/S. Simplex Infrastructures Limi ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Shashi Kiran Shetty

(These writ petitions are filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india, with a prayer to quash impugned order dated 24.06.2013 made in i'.a. no.i in as nos. 40/2011, 42/2011, 43/2011, 41/2011 respectively...