Advanced Search Results
Ram Niwas and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Others
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-09-2013
Land Acquisition
Saluja Mukesh Kumar 2013.09.16 12:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP NO.3181 o”1. HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP NO.3181 of 1992 Date of decision:09.09.2013...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskU.P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. Through Its General Manager Vs. Spec ...
Allahabad
May-17-2003
CivilProperty
Constitution of India - Articles 225 and 226; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 15(1) and 15(2); Advocate Act, 1961 - Sections 16; Uttar Pradesh Bar Councel Rules
(2003)3UPLBEC2042
Rajesh D. Khare, Adv.
R.B. Misra, J.1. This case was heard on 15.9.1999 by this Court and after hearing the Court has been pleased to pass the following orders:'Learned Standing Counsel has appeared on behalf of respondents No. 1 to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMalwa Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-09-2008
Company
(2008)151PLR291
Ranjit Singh, J.1. M/s Malwa Sugar Mills Company Limited, Dhuri, District Sangrur, has filed this writ petition, impugning the orders dated 11.4.1983 (Annexure P-11), dated 2.5.1983 (Annexure P-12), dated 9.5.1983 (Annexure P-13), dated 18.5.1983 (Annexure P-15)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Present: Mr. O.P. Goel Sr. Advocate with Vs.
Punjab and Haryana
May-02-2013
Education
CRM not M-5504 of 2011 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (223) CRM not M-5504 of 2011 (O&M) Date of decision:02. 05.2013. Gurmeet Kaur ......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWaterman Engineers (P) Limited 55 Priti Nagar, Hisar, Through Its Vs. ...
Punjab and Haryana
May-22-2013
Arbitration
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.5289 of 2004 (O&M) Date of decision:22.05.2013 Waterman Engineers (P) Limited, 55, Priti Nagar, Hisar, through its Director Shri Vinot Kumar Goel son of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPresent : Mr. O. P. Goel Senior Advocate Vs. Rakesh Kumar .... Petitio ...
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-19-2013
Education
C.R.No.700 o”1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Sr.No.217 Case No.: C.R.No.700 of 2013 Date of Decision : July 19, 2013 Rakesh Kumar ...Petitioner versus Jagdish Chander and others ...Respondents CORAM :...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSiri Chand and ors. Vs. Nathi
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-21-1983
Property
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10; Limitation Act - Sections 21; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 1 and 59
AIR1983P& H171
S.S. Sandhawalia, C.J.1. A meaningful challenge to the ratio of the Division Bench judgment in Inder Singh v. Mst. Kishno, (1966) 68 Pun LR 408, has inevitably necessitated this reference to the Full Bench.2. As would...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSatish Gupta and ors. Vs. Yamuna Nagar Improvement Trust Through Its A ...
Punjab and Haryana
Nov-15-1999
Property
Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 - Sections 24; Constitution of India - Article 226;
(2000)124PLR772
O.P. Goyal, Sr. Adv. and; Mohan Luthra, Adv.
R.L. Anand, J.1. Satish Gupta and 26 others have filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the respondents seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the auction...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Haryana Vs. Suresh Chand and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-01-1997
Civil
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23; Eviction Act, 1872 - Sections 51A
(1998)118PLR464
H.S. Hooda, A.G. and; S.K. Sharma, D.A.G.
V.K. Bali, J.1. In this bunch of appeals, whereas obvious prayer of the claimants in R.F.A. Nos. 1824 of 1990, 1823, 1868, 1869, 1870 of 1991, 33 to 43, 273, 274, 468, 1230 and 1231 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsha Ram Vs. Rai Singh Etc.
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-18-1997
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10
(1998)118PLR835
Mansur Ali, Adv.
G.C. Garg, J.1. Plaintiff-respondents filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction tinder Order 1 Rule 10 of the Civil -Procedure Code against Rai Singh and others on August 26,1986. Parties to the suit concluded their...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »