Advanced Search Results

State of U.P. and anr. Vs. Vinod Prakash Tayal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 1995Supp(4)SCC412

M.N. Venkatachaliah and; N.P. Singh, JJ.1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the caveator. The points urged by the learned counsel on the merits of the view taken by the...

Chandrika Devi. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : M/s. S.N.P.Singh; Arvind Kumar Choudhar, Advs.

1. This writ application is directed against the order dated 8.1.2003 passed by the Commissioner, Santhal Pargana Division, Dumka as contained in Annexure 5 whereby the order of eviction (Annexure 4) from the land in question...

State of Orissa Vs. Mohd. Yunus and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Reported in : 1994Supp(2)SCC55

K. Ramaswamy and; N.P. Singh, JJ.1. We have heard the counsel on either side. Leave granted.2. This appeal arises against the order of the tribunal made in O.A. No. 1005 of 1989 dated March 22, 1993....

Chetan Metal Supply Corpn. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 136

Reported in : (2000)10SCC96; 1994Supp(2)SCC575

P.B. Sawant and; N.P. Singh, JJ.1. Delay condoned. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that his Writ Petition No. 3159 of 1982 was wrongly placed on board along with other group of petitions where the issue...

K. Ramadas Shenoy Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961 - Sections 48, 49(2)

Reported in : 1994Supp(2)SCC516

M.M. Punchhi and; N.P. Singh, JJ.1. The only point for consideration which has been argued by the learned counsel for the appellant, is that the combined reading of Sections 48 and 49 of the Karnataka Town...

Director of School Education, Madras and ors. Vs. O. Karuppa thevan an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1994Supp(2)SCC666; (1996)1UPLBEC347

P.B. Sawant and; N.P. Singh, JJ.1. Though the appellant-landlord succeeded in the trial court, that success was actually short-lived. The High Court reversed the decree. The landlord obtained a decree for eviction on the ground of...

State of Haryana and ors. Vs. Radhey Shyam

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1995Supp(4)SCC245

Advocate for Appellant : Smt. Indu Malhotra

K. Ramaswamy and; N.P. Singh, JJ.1. We have heard learned counsel on either side.2. Special leave granted. We find great force in the contention of Smt Indu Malhotra, learned counsel for the appellants. The conditions of...

Mohinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1995Supp(4)SCC433; 1994(27)ATC448; 1994SCC(L&S)842;

S. Ranganathan and; N.P. Singh, JJ.1. We have heard both the learned counsel. The High Court held on the strength of the Division Bench decision in Sarwan Singh v. State of Punjab [ILR (1985) 2 P&H...

State of Gujarat Vs. Thakkar Devchandbhai Laljibhai

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (2000)10SCC618

A.M. Ahmadi, C.J.,; N.P. Singh and; B.N. Kirpal, JJ.1. Special leave granted.2. Heard counsel on both sides.3. The short question concerns the interpretation of Section 61-A of the Indian Forest Act introduced by the Gujarat Amendment...

Shivraya, Son of Basappa Vs. Bakkappa, Son of Irappa

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 35

Reported in : 1995Supp(3)SCC400

R.M. Sahai and; N.P. Singh, JJ.1. Heard learned counsel.2. Leave granted.3. This is defendant's appeal. The appellant and the respondent are close relations. Both claimed title to the land in dispute. The plaintiff claimed that the...