Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: n c jain · Page 1 of about 345 results (0.170 seconds)

Mar 20 2002

Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Vishwavidyalaya and ors. Vs. State of M.P. ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-20-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Viswavidyalaya Adhiniyam, 1995 - Sections 4, 9(2), 31-A(1), 31-A(2), 31-B, 31-C and 37-A; ;Maharishi Mahesh Yogi Vedic Viswavidyalaya (Sanshodhan) Adhiniyam, 2000; ;Constitution of India - Article 14; Madhya Pradesh Vishwavidyalaya Adhiniyam, 1973 - Sections 51 and 52

Reported in : AIR2002MP196; 2002(2)MPHT353

Advocate for Appellant : N.C. Jain and ;Ravindra Shrivastava, Sr. Advs. and ;Kishore Shrivastava and ;Riyush Dharmadhikari, Advs.

Dipak Misra, J. 1. In this writ petition it is imperative to bestow our anxious consideration on the long debate and deliberation that took place consuming quite a speck of time relating to contentious issues which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2002

Sharique Ali and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-11-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 3(1), 8, 14, 15, 16, 16(1), 19(1), 21, 26(1), 30(1) and (2), 35, 39, 39A, 41, 45, 46, 51A, 213, 226, 226(1), 254, 309, 311, 337 and 371E; Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Shikshan Sanstha (Adhyapakon Tatha Anya Karmachariyon Ke Vetano Ka Sandaya), 2000 - Sections 4, 5 and 6; University Grant Commission Act, 1956; Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Shikshan Sanstha (Adhyapakon Tatha Anya Karmachariyon Ke Vetano Ka Sandaya) Adhiniyam, 1978 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 9, 10 and 11; Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Shikshan Sanstha (Adhyapakon Tatha Anya Karmachariyon Ke Vetano Ka Sandaya) (Amendment) Act, 2000 - Sections 7; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Society Registrikaran Act; Madhya Pradesh Viswa Vidyalaya Adhiniyam 1973; Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Shikshan Sanstha (Institu

Reported in : 2002(1)MPHT315

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Kale, ;Ravindra Shrivastava, ;R.P. Agrawal, ;R.N. Singh, ;N.C. Jain, ;Rajendra Tiwari, ;V.S. Dabir and ;S.L. Saxena, Sr. Advs., ;Sanjay Agrawal, Rohit Arya, ;Kishore Shrivastava, ;M. Bhatti, ;M

ORDERDipak Misra, J. 1. The centrum, issue that we are obligated to advert to in this batch of writ petitions, which are inseggregable and inseverable, is 'education' that makes a man a complete human being in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 12 2003

Sanjay Richharia Vs. Director, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-12-2003

Subject : Contract

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 147, 149, 294, 307, 323, 325, 332, 341, 350, 420 and 506B; Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 17B

Reported in : 2004(1)CTLJ240(MP); 2003(4)MPLJ148

Advocate for Appellant : N.C. Jain, Sr. Adv. and ;Sanjay Dwivedi, Adv.

Bhawani Singh, C.J.1. This Letters Patent Appeal arises out of order dated 22.10.2001 passed by Single Judge in W.P. No. 3836 of 2001.2. Pursuant to advertisement published by the Director, Indian Oil Corporation Limited and the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Apr 02 1993

Sunderlal Patwa Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-02-1993

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 352, 355, 356, 356(3) and 361; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 9; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123

Reported in : AIR1993MP214

Advocate for Appellant : N.C. Jain and ;R.P. Jain, Advs.

S.K. Jha, C.J. 1. We have assembled today for the purpose of deciding only one incidental matter on which learned counsel for the parties insist. We give our ruling at the outset before we proceed further...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 1998

Narayandas Sharma Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-06-1998

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 19(3), 43A and 43A(2)

Reported in : AIR1999MP197

Advocate for Appellant : N.C. Jain, Sr. Adv. and ;Jeevendra Pandey, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under A. 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for issue of appropriate writ to declare the proceedings of the meeting of Nagar...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2001

Jankidas Bairagi and Another Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-22-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Sanshodhan) Adhiniyam, 2001 - Sections 4, 5, 5-A, 6, 6-C(2), 7, 7-A, 7-B, 7-L, 7-M and 49; Constitution of India - Article 243, 243-A, 243-G and 243-H; Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, 1993 - Sections 2 and 49-A

Reported in : 2001(2)MPHT229; 2001(2)MPLJ477

Advocate for Appellant : Shri N.C. Jain, Sr. Adv. and ;Shri Rakesh Jain, Adv.

ORDERBhawani Singh, C.J.1. The Madhya Pradesh Panchayal Raj Adhiniyam, 1993, has been amended by the 'Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Sanshodhan) Adhiniyam, 2001' (Act No. 3/2001), published in M.P. Rajpatra (Asadharan), dated January 22,2001. The statement of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2001

Rajbali Singh Vs. Board of Secondary Education

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-29-2001

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Madhya Pradesh Date of Birth (Entries in the School Register) Rules, 1973 - Rules 3, 7, 8 and 9;

Reported in : 2001(5)MPHT165; 2001(3)MPLJ276

Advocate for Appellant : N.C. Jain, Sr. Adv. and ;Rakesh Jain, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. If man could have arrested 'Time', the greatest and invincible enemy of man, 'that old common arbitrator' and make it his slave the history of man-kind would have been different. It has been...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 1969

Dhanpal Singh Vs. the State

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-08-1969

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21

Reported in : AIR1970P& H514; 1970CriLJ1568

Advocate for Appellant : N.C. Jain, Adv.

A.D. Koshal, J. 1. The petitioner was convicted by a Judicial Magistrate at Karnal of an offence under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a year and a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 01 2002

Radhelal Gupta Vs. State Bar Council of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-01-2002

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 5, 8 and 8A; Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 74 and 85

Reported in : AIR2002MP98; 2002(2)MPHT10

Advocate for Appellant : N.C. Jain and ;P.S. Nair, Sr. Advs.

ORDERDipak Misra, J. 1. The pivotal issue that arises for consideration in this writ petition preferred by a learned member of the Bar whether the members of the State Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh are entitled...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 14 2002

A.K. Shrivastava Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-14-2002

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 74, 74(1), 74(2), 74(3) and 74(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 309, 310 and 323A; Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 4

Reported in : 2002(3)MPHT1

Advocate for Appellant : S.L. Saxena, ;N.C. Jain, ;P.S. Nair, Sr. Advs., ;M.L. Choubey, ;Alok Pathak, ;Sandeep Awade and ;Shobha Menon, Advs.

ORDERS.S. Saraf, J. 1. The factual matrix and the question of law involved being similar, this petition and the following petitions were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common order. (i) W.P. No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Next ›
Last »

Advanced Search Results

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.