Advanced Search Results

Kanwar Singh and anr. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sandeep Tandon

Alok Singh, J.1. Mr. Sandeep Tandon, learned Counsel for the applicants/petitioners.2. Mr. Prabhakar Joshi, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent No. 1.3. Mr. Vinod Sharma, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 2.4. Heard.5. Present...

Krishan Lal Thakur Vs. Shri Shakti Trikha and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Criminal

Alok Singh, J.1. Heard Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Counsel for the revisionist, Mr. Sandeep Tandon, learned Counsel appearing for opp. party No. 1 and Mr. Nandan Arya, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State/opp. party No. 2.2....

The Indian Singers Rights Association Vs. Chapter 25 Bar and Restauran ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

1. This is a suit by the Indian Singers Rights Association ( ISRA ) filedagainst Chapter 25 Bar and Restaurant operating at the Metropolitan Mall in Pushp Vihar, New Delhi. 2. The prayers in the suit...

Smt. Neelam Jaipuria and Another Vs. State and Another

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 482,; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138, 142

1. Heard Mr. Mohd. Azim, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Tandon, Advocate for the applicants and Mr. Nandan Arya, AGA for State of Uttarakhand/respondent no.1. 2. This Criminal Misc. application has been filed by the...

Nazmul Huda Vs. State of Uttarakhand

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 489C, 498B, 498E

1. Heard Mohd. Azim, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Tandon, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State.   2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that only a recovery...

Rajnish Kumar, and anr. Vs.State of Uttaranchal and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 406, 420 ;

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sandeep Tandon, Adv.

1. These two petitions have arisen out of a common summoning order and the dispute to be decided in both of them is also same, hence both the petitions are being decided by this common judgment...

Rajnish Kumar. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 406, 420 ;

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Sandeep Tandon, Adv.

1. These two petitions have arisen out of a common summoning order and the dispute to be decided in both of them is also same, hence both the petitions are being decided by this common judgment...

Reliance Natural Resources Ltd. Vs. Reliance Industries Limited

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Oil Fields (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948 - Sections 2 and 3; Economic Zone and other Maritime Zone Act, 1976; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 36, 39, 235 to 251, 391 to 394, 433 and 643; Evidence Act - Sections 57 to 62; Income Tax Act - Sections 2(19AA), 2(19AAA) and 2(41A); Companies (Amendment) Act, 2002; Board of Directors Act; Contract Act - Sections 17; U.K. Act - Sections 206; Constitution of India - Article 297; Petroleum and Natural Gas Rules, 1959; Companies Rules

Reported in : [2009]149CompCas129(Bom); [2008]82SCL303(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Counsel, ;Saurabh Krupal, ;Manali Singhal, ;Mahesh Agrawal, ;Venkatresh Dhond, ;Amol Desai, Advs., i/b., Mulla and Mulla

Anoop V. Mohta, J.1. A founder father, late Dhirubhai Ambani set up the Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) some time in the year 1973, who ventured along with the time, into oil, gas, refining and exploration apart...

Sri Chand and ors. Vs. Satyavati Devi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationLimitation

Acts : Delhi High Court Act - Sections 10; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34, 34(2) and 34(3); Limitation Act - Sections 5 and 29(2)

Reported in : 2007(3)ARBLR412(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : S. Aggarwal, Adv

Mukundakam Sharma, C.J.1. This appeal has been filed by the appellants under Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act whereby the appellants have challenged the legality and validity of the order dated 6th November, 2001...

Vishwa Nath Agrawal and ors. Vs. Mrs. Satyawati Devi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationLimitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 33, Rules 1 and 2; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 33(1), 33(4), 34, 34(1) and 34(3); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 14

Reported in : 2007(4)ARBLR167(Delhi); 2007(98)DRJ633

Advocate for Appellant : Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv.; Trideep Pais an; Nitika Mangla, Advs

S.N. Aggarwal, J.1. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 for setting aside of the arbitral award dated 19.8.2000 of the sole Arbitrator Sh Sandeep Tandon in...