Nazmul Huda Vs. State of Uttarakhand

Nazmul Huda vs State of Uttarakhand

Type Court Judgment Court Himachal Pradesh Decided Sep 01, 2010

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/919366

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/919366
Court: Himachal Pradesh High Court
Judge: Dharam Veer, J.
Decided On: Sep 01, 2010
Case Number: BA1--643/2010
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal
Acts & sections: Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 489C, 498B, 498E

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nazmul Huda

Respondent

State of Uttarakhand

Legal References

Acts: Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 489C, 498B, 498E

Excerpt

1. heard mohd. azim, advocate holding brief of mr. sandeep tandon, advocate for the applicant and mr. amit bhatt, addl. ga for the state. 2. learned counsel for the applicant submitted that only a recovery of counterfeit notes has been made from the applicant and the same offence comes u/s 489c ipc which is a bailable offence. it is pleaded that the applicant is in jail since 28.2.2010. 3. having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage. 4. let the applicant nazmul huda be released on bail on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate, dehradun. the bail application is allowed accordingly.

Full Judgment

1. Heard Mohd. Azim, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Tandon, Advocate for the applicant and Mr. Amit Bhatt, Addl. GA for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that only a recovery of counterfeit notes has been made from the applicant and the same offence comes u/s 489C IPC which is a bailable offence. It is pleaded that the applicant is in jail since 28.2.2010.

3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and after going through the papers on record, without expressing any opinion about the final merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves bail at this stage.

4. Let the applicant Nazmul Huda be released on bail on his executing personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun. The bail application is allowed accordingly.

Same Court & Year Himachal Pradesh · 2010 Same Parties Nazmul Huda vs State of Uttarakhand Same Subject Criminal Same Judge Dharam Veer, J. Acts & Sections Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 489C, 498B, 498E