Advanced Search Results

M/S Pantaloon Retail (India) Ltd. and ors Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D.C. Mathur, Mr. Rajeev Agarwal, Mr. Sanjay K. Sharma

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3837/2009 & CRL.M.A. 13069/2009 M/S PANTALOON RETAIL (INDIA) LTD. & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. D.C. Mathur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajeev Agarwal,...

Delhi Public Library vs.the Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Urvi Mohan, Mr. Sanjay Ghose, Mr. Yashpal Singh, Ms. Urvi Mohan

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6769/2014 Mr. Yashpal Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus DELHI PUBLIC LIBRARY Through: + W.P.(C) 4189/2015 & CM APPL.7585/2015 THE GOVT. OF NCT OF...

Delhi Public Library vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Urvi Mohan, Mr. Sanjay Ghose, Mr. Yashpal Singh, Ms. Urvi Mohan

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6769/2014 Mr. Yashpal Singh, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus DELHI PUBLIC LIBRARY Through: + W.P.(C) 4189/2015 & CM APPL.7585/2015 THE GOVT. OF NCT OF...

Mukesh Kumar Vs. P.O., Labour Court No. Ix (Delhi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000IIIAD(Delhi)339; 84(2000)DLT256

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajeev Agarwal, Adv

ORDERA.K. Sikri, J.1. Rule. With the consent of parties, the matter is taken up for final disposal at this stage. 2. Ex parte award was passed against the petitioner. Perusal of the said award dated 3.11.1995...

R.N. Rattan Vs. M/S Oriental Bank of Commerce and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.M. Bagai; Mr. Sunil Bagai, Advs.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? (No)2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? (No)3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest? (No) 1. The petitioner...