Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr kantawala · Page 1 of about 46 results (0.083 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 30 2014

Karishma Qureshi Vs. Faisal Qureshi

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-30-2014

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Kantawala

1. By this petition preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has impugned the order dated 21st May, 2013 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court No.7, Bandra, Mumbai, below Exhibit No.53...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 1961

K. Shankar Narayan Vs. S.S. Thakur and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-04-1961

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 59; Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 2

Reported in : AIR1962Bom260; (1962)64BOMLR135; [1962(4)FLR294]; (1962)ILLJ464Bom

Advocate for Appellant : P.D. Kamerkar, Adv.

Mody, J.(1) This is a petition for an appropriate writ or direction under Article 227 of the Constitution filed by the petitioner challenging the judgment and order dated 18th February 1961, dismissing the petitioner's application passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2006

Commissioner of Customs (General) Vs. Worldwide Cargo Movers

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-29-2006

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108, 127, 129A, 130 and 146(2); Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004 - Regulations 4, 8, 10, 11(2), 13, 13(1), 19(8), 20(1) and 22

Reported in : 2007(1)BomCR789

Advocate for Appellant : Pradeep S. Jetly, Adv. for Customs Appeal No. 37 of 2006 and ;Sujay Kantawala, Adv. for Customs Appeal No. 39 of 2006

H.L. Gokhale, J. 1. Customs Appeal No. 37 of 2006 is filed by the Commissioner of Customs (General). Respondent to this Appeal is Worldwide Cargo Movers, a Firm functioning as a Custom House Agent ('CHA' for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 06 1955

P.L. Mayekar and anr. Vs. Amichand Narayan and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-06-1955

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 10(1)

Reported in : AIR1956Bom30; (1955)57BOMLR1000; ILR1956Bom26

Advocate for Appellant : H.R. Gokhale, Adv.

Chagla, C. J.1. This is an appeal against the decision of Coyajee J. by which he quashed an order passed by the Industrial Appellate Tribunal, and he came to make the order under the following circumstances....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2003

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Marmo Classic

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-03-2003

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 130A

Reported in : 2003(89)ECC841; 2003(156)ELT14(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : R.V. Desai, Sr. Counsel, ;P.S. Jetly, ;S.M. Shah and ;A.S. Rao, Advs., i/b., ;T.C. Kaushik, Adv.

J.P. Devadhar, J.1. In all these Customs Applications filed under Section 130A of the Customs Act, 1962, the Commissioner of Customs seeks an order directing the CEGAT, Mumbai to raise and refer certain questions of law...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 1993

Oriole (Exports) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-28-1993

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1993LC587(Bombay); 1993(68)ELT724(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. N.R. Kantawala and ;Mr. S.N. Kantawala, Advs., i/b.,; Kantawala & Co.

Pendse, J. 1. The Petitioner No. 1 are the holders of a import licence dated June 24, 1982 issued during the policy period April to March 1983. The licence was revalidated on December 25, 1983 during...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 2003

Marmo Classic Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-14-2003

Subject : Customs

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 27A and 130A; Customs (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Sections 27A

Reported in : 2003LC662(Bombay); 2004(1)MhLj18

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Kantawala, Adv., i/b., ;Kantawala & Co.

1. The petition, makes a complaint that the respondents have arbitrarily and illegally withheld the amount of refund in the sum of Rs. 1,35,39,000/- due and payable to the petitioners which is in defiance of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 2005

Union of India (UOi) through the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-16-2005

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act - Sections 108, 111, 123 and 123(1); Evidence Act - Sections 106 and 114

Reported in : 2006(1)BomCR249; (2005)107BOMLR1082

Advocate for Appellant : R.V. Desai, Sr. Adv. and ;Rajiv Chavan, Adv.

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. Heard Mr. R.V. Desai with Mr. Rajiv Chavan for the petitioner. Mr. Kantawala appears for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.2. This petition seeks to challenge the order passed by the Customs Excise and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1991

Collector of Customs Vs. Nippon Bearings (P) Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Mar-04-1991

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1991)LC587Tri(Delhi)

1. These 4 appeals are disposed of by a common order as issue involved is common to all the appeals. The respondents in appeal No. C/3339/88-A which arises out of an order in SS/10-53/87 dated 20th...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 1997

Swati Growth Funds Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-28-1997

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1998)(97)ELT71Tri(Mum.)bai

1. This is an appeal filed by the Appellant against the decision dated 21-10-1992 passed by the Collector of Customs (Appeals) who confirmed the order passed by the Additional Collector of Customs dated 18-9-1992 made in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial