Advanced Search Results
Karishma Qureshi Vs. Faisal Qureshi
Mumbai
Jul-30-2014
Education
Mr. Kantawala
1. By this petition preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has impugned the order dated 21st May, 2013 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court No.7, Bandra, Mumbai, below Exhibit No.53...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Shankar Narayan Vs. S.S. Thakur and anr.
Mumbai
Oct-04-1961
Labour and Industrial
Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 59; Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 2
AIR1962Bom260; (1962)64BOMLR135; [1962(4)FLR294]; (1962)ILLJ464Bom
P.D. Kamerkar, Adv.
Mody, J.(1) This is a petition for an appropriate writ or direction under Article 227 of the Constitution filed by the petitioner challenging the judgment and order dated 18th February 1961, dismissing the petitioner's application passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs (General) Vs. Worldwide Cargo Movers
Mumbai
Nov-29-2006
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108, 127, 129A, 130 and 146(2); Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004 - Regulations 4, 8, 10, 11(2), 13, 13(1), 19(8), 20(1) and 22
2007(1)BomCR789
Pradeep S. Jetly, Adv. for Customs Appeal No. 37 of 2006 and ;Sujay Kantawala, Adv. for Customs Appeal No. 39 of 2006
H.L. Gokhale, J. 1. Customs Appeal No. 37 of 2006 is filed by the Commissioner of Customs (General). Respondent to this Appeal is Worldwide Cargo Movers, a Firm functioning as a Custom House Agent ('CHA' for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
P.L. Mayekar and anr. Vs. Amichand Narayan and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-06-1955
Labour and Industrial
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 10(1)
AIR1956Bom30; (1955)57BOMLR1000; ILR1956Bom26
H.R. Gokhale, Adv.
Chagla, C. J.1. This is an appeal against the decision of Coyajee J. by which he quashed an order passed by the Industrial Appellate Tribunal, and he came to make the order under the following circumstances....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs Vs. Marmo Classic
Mumbai
Jul-03-2003
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 130A
2003(89)ECC841; 2003(156)ELT14(Bom)
R.V. Desai, Sr. Counsel, ;P.S. Jetly, ;S.M. Shah and ;A.S. Rao, Advs., i/b., ;T.C. Kaushik, Adv.
J.P. Devadhar, J.1. In all these Customs Applications filed under Section 130A of the Customs Act, 1962, the Commissioner of Customs seeks an order directing the CEGAT, Mumbai to raise and refer certain questions of law...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOriole (Exports) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Mumbai
Jul-28-1993
Customs
1993LC587(Bombay); 1993(68)ELT724(Bom)
Mr. N.R. Kantawala and ;Mr. S.N. Kantawala, Advs., i/b.,; Kantawala & Co.
Pendse, J. 1. The Petitioner No. 1 are the holders of a import licence dated June 24, 1982 issued during the policy period April to March 1983. The licence was revalidated on December 25, 1983 during...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMarmo Classic Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Mumbai
Jul-14-2003
Customs
Constitution of India - Article 226; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 27A and 130A; Customs (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Sections 27A
2003LC662(Bombay); 2004(1)MhLj18
S.N. Kantawala, Adv., i/b., ;Kantawala & Co.
1. The petition, makes a complaint that the respondents have arbitrarily and illegally withheld the amount of refund in the sum of Rs. 1,35,39,000/- due and payable to the petitioners which is in defiance of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (UOi) through the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) ...
Mumbai
Nov-16-2005
Customs
Customs Act - Sections 108, 111, 123 and 123(1); Evidence Act - Sections 106 and 114
2006(1)BomCR249; (2005)107BOMLR1082
R.V. Desai, Sr. Adv. and ;Rajiv Chavan, Adv.
H.L. Gokhale, J.1. Heard Mr. R.V. Desai with Mr. Rajiv Chavan for the petitioner. Mr. Kantawala appears for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.2. This petition seeks to challenge the order passed by the Customs Excise and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCollector of Customs Vs. Nippon Bearings (P) Ltd.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Mar-04-1991
MRTP
(1991)LC587Tri(Delhi)
1. These 4 appeals are disposed of by a common order as issue involved is common to all the appeals. The respondents in appeal No. C/3339/88-A which arises out of an order in SS/10-53/87 dated 20th...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSwati Growth Funds Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Oct-28-1997
MRTP
(1998)(97)ELT71Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This is an appeal filed by the Appellant against the decision dated 21-10-1992 passed by the Collector of Customs (Appeals) who confirmed the order passed by the Additional Collector of Customs dated 18-9-1992 made in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »