Advanced Search Results

V.K. Ranade Vs. Food Corporation of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1998RLR365

Advocate for Appellant : V. Shekhar and ; K.A. Dewan, Advs

Usha Mehra, J.(1) The petitioner has challenged the order of his dismissal on following counts, namely that order of initiating disciplinary proceedings and of dismissal is bad in law because the same had not been issued...

Food Corporation of India and ors Vs. Suraj Bhan

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K.A. Dewan, Mr. Deepak Dewan

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h August, 2013 % + RFA 68/2008 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. K.A. Dewan and Mr. Deepak Dewan, Advocates....

K. Lalchandani Vs. Meenu Lalchandani

Court : Delhi

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 24; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125

Reported in : 1997VIAD(Delhi)44; 68(1997)DLT712; II(1997)DMC363

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Luthra and; K.C. Dewan, Advs

N.G. Nandi, J. (1) These two cross civil revision petitions under Section 115, Cpc arise out of the order dated 6.7.1996 passed in Hindu Marriage Petition No. 20/94 under Sections 24-26 of the Hindu Marriage Act...

Amber Woollen Mills Vs. Nominations (India), New Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 9, Rule 9

Reported in : ILR1976Delhi423

Advocate for Appellant : L.K. Gaur,; D.C. Ulfat,; Sarup Singh and;

Yogeshwar Dayal, J.(1) This is an application on behalt of the plaintiffs for setting aside the dismissal of the suit by order dated 22-4-1975, and for restoration of the suit on the file of the Court....

Surinder Kumar Pruthi and ors. Vs. Udan Chits (P) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)462; 75(1998)DLT388; 1998(46)DRJ853; 1999(1)RLR117

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K.A. Dewan, Adv.

ORDERS.N. Kapoor, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner. It appears that only Surinder Kumar Pruthi filed objection to the award within the stipulated time of 30 days. The objector claims that the claimant manipulated...

Ms. Jaishree Manchanda Vs. New Delhi Municipal Council and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2001VAD(Delhi)361; 92(2001)DLT359

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K.A. Dewan, Adv

ORDERManmohan Sarin. J Rule.1. With the consent of the parties writ petition is taken up for disposal.2. Petitioner assails the order bearing No.10/3537/0/W dated 14.11.1996 rejecting her application for grant of regular electric connection on the...

Shri Nem Chand Daga Vs. Shri Inder Mohan Singh Rana

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 14(1) and 25-B, 25-B (4), (5), (6), (7) and (8); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 37, Rule 3(5)

Reported in : 94(2001)DLT683; 2002(61)DRJ410

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V.B. Andley, Sr. Adv. and; Mr. K.C. Dewan, Adv

ORDERVikramajit Sen, J.1. In this Revision Petition the challenge is in respect of the Order dated 28.9.2000 passed by the Additional Rent Controller, Delhi in which he has declined to grant the Tenant 'Leave to Contest'...

T. Chakkalackal Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 6 and 9

Reported in : JT1992(1)SC106; 1993Supp(4)SCC211

ORDERA.M. Ahmadi, J.1. In the present proceedings which were commenced some time in June, 1985 a Vigilance Committee was appointed in October, 1985, and thereafter orders were made from time to time. We do not consider...

Akshay Kapur and ors. Vs. Rishav Kapur and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rule 17 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 11, Rule 12 - Order 39, Rules 1, 2, 2A and 4

Reported in : 2006(88)DRJ790

Advocate for Appellant : C.A. Sundaram,; Amarjit Singh Chandhiok, Sr. Adv.,; Saurabh

Madan B. Lokur, J.1. The Plaintiffs have filed a suit for a decree of declaration to the effect that the Report of the Valuation of Kapur Family Group as at 31st March, 2002 (circulated in January,...