Advanced Search Results
Natwarlal Chhotulal Patel Vs. State of Gujarat and 3 ors.
Gujarat
Jan-10-2006
Service
[2006(110)FLR166]; (2006)1GLR803
K.B. Pujara, Adv. for Petitioner 1
Jayant Patel, J.1. Mr. Pujara, learned Counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to delete respondent No.4 as the action of respondent No.4 is not challenged. Permission granted. Rule. Mr. Desai, learned AGP waives service of Rule...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVenkatesh Iyer Vs. Bombay Hospital Trust and Others
Mumbai
Feb-27-1998
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 60 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 - Order 33 - Rules 1 and 9
1998(2)BomCR798
Mihir Desai and ;Ms. Adenwala, Advs.
ORDERDr. Pratibha Upasani, J.1. This Notice of Motion is taken out by defendant Nos. 1 and 2 praying that the plaintiff be disappeared under the provisions of Order XXXIII, Rule 9 of the Code of Civil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAkhil Kabir Panth Samaj Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Jul-23-1987
Constitution
Constitution Of India - Article 32
1987Supp(1)SCC603
M.M. Dutt and; Ranganath Misra, JJ.1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also learned Additional Solicitor-General for Union of India and Doordarshan and Mr Desai for the Producer. It has been disclosed by the Director...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kalu Khoda and ors. Vs. the State
Gujarat
Mar-07-1962
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 207A, 227(2), 337(1), 337(2), 337(2A), 496, 497 and 498
AIR1962Guj283; (1962)3GLR654
Batubhai H. Desai, Amicus Curiae
Shelat, J.1. These are four Criminal Revision Applications, together with an application No. 89 of 1962 for bail, by the accused in sessions Case No. 15 of 1961.2. On the 19th of September, 1960, at about...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Maharashtra Vs. Glaxo Laboratories (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Mumbai
Feb-22-1979
Civil
(1980)82BOMLR46
Mr. Desai
Madon, J.1. Glaxo Laboratories (India) Pvt. Ltd., who are the respondents No. 1 before us, filed a suit on the .Original Side of this High Court against the State of Maharashtra, the Collector of Bombay, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahendra Manilal Nanavati Vs. Sushila Mahendra Nanavati
Supreme Court of India
Mar-18-1964
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 12 and 23; Evidence Act - Sections 112 and 114; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 107 - Order 41, Rules 20, 23 and 25; Constitution of India - Article 133(1)
AIR1965SC364; (1964)66BOMLR681; 1965MhLJ365(SC); [1964]7SCR267
Mr. Desai
Raghubar Dayal, J.1. This appeal, on a certificate granted by the Bombay High Court, arises out of a petition praying for the annulment of the petitioner-appellant's marriage with the respondent, under s. 12 of the Hindu...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.S. Venkataraman and Co. Vs. State of Madras
Supreme Court of India
Oct-18-1965
Sales Tax
Sales Tax Act; Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 - Sections 18A
AIR1966SC1089; [1966]60ITR112(SC); [1966]2SCR229; [1966]17STC418(SC)
Mr. Desai
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 618 of 1963. Appeal from the judgment and order dated October 10, 1960 of the Madras High Court in C.C.C.A. No. 90 of 1957. S. T. Desai, K. R....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLeela Hotels Ltd. Vs. Housing and Urban Dev.Corp.Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-15-2011
Arbitration and Conciliation
Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34; Contract Act. - Sections59, 60; Indian Contract Act, 1872.
AIR2012SC903; 2012(1)AWC(Supp)39SC; (2012)1MLJ641(SC); 2011(12)SCALE573; (2012)1SCC302
1. Leave granted.2. This Appeal has been filed by Leela Hotels Ltd. against the judgment and order dated 20th July, 2009, passed by the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in EFA(OS) No.4 of 2009,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHousing and Urban Development Corporation Limited Vs. Leela Hotels Ltd ... Overruled
Delhi
Jul-20-2009
Civil
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34; Contract Act - Section 59, Contract Act - Section 60, Contract Act - Section 61; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21 Rule 1
A.S. Chandhiok, ASG, S. Kumar, Ayush Aggarwal and Ritesh Kumar, Advs
ALTAMAS KABIR, J.1. Leave granted.2. Being aggrieved by the steps taken by the Respondent Corporation, the Appellant filed a Petition before the Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court to appoint an Arbitrator in terms of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Swastik Textile Mills Ltd. and in Re: Phaltan Sugar Works Ltd.
Mumbai
Jan-14-1983
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391, 394 and 394A; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practice Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 20, 23 and 23(1)
(1983)85BOMLR244; [1985]57CompCas766(Bom)
Mr. Desai
Kania, J.1. These are two petitions under ss. 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, whereby the petitioners in Company Petition No. 684 of 1981 have prayed for being amalgamated with the petitioners in Company...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »