Advanced Search Results
Thiru A. Balakrishnan and anr. Vs. Govt. of T.N. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-22-1994
Service
Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Services Rules, 1955 - Rule 10(a)(i), 23
1995Supp(4)SCC108
Kuldip Singh,; S.C. Agrawal and; Yogeshwar Dayal, JJ.1. We issued notice in the review petition as Mr Chidambaram, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, contended that the view taken by us goes contrary to the ratio...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. Sundaram Vs. Pallavan Transport Corporation Ltd.
Chennai
Jan-29-1985
Labour and Industrial
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 307, 322, 380, 401 and 457; Arms Act - Sections 24; Probation of Offenders Act - Sections 4(1)
(1987)ILLJ478Mad
Mr. Chidambaram
Ramanujam, J.1. The appellant herein was a driver of the Pallavan Transport Corporation, who was arrested by the police and kept in police custody for offences under Ss. 307, 322, 380 and 457, I.P.C. and S....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChinnamman and Co., Pollachi and anr. Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board ...
Chennai
Jan-24-1984
Commercial
Constitution' of India - Article 226
AIR1986Mad302
Mr. Chidambaram
Natarajan, J.1. Both the appeals are connected and arise out of the common order of Mohan, J. passed in W. P. Nos. 382 and 516 of 1983. The latter appeal has been filed by the Tamil...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Committee of Management of the Padanthalu Moodu Village Co-operati ...
Chennai
Apr-09-1973
Trusts and Societies
Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 65, 66, 72, 72(1) and 72(6)
AIR1973Mad460; (1973)2MLJ200
Mr. Chidambaram
ORDER1. The petitioner-society is aggrieved by the order of the first respondent dated 11-6-1971, in and by which the first respondent dissolved the petitioner-society under Section 72(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act 1961 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChinnamma and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and anr.
Chennai
Dec-05-1984
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 17(1) and 17(4)
AIR1986Mad55
Mr. Chidambaram
Ramanujam, J.1. These writ appeals are directed against the decision of Mohan J. in W. P. Nos. 9511, 9512 and 9513 of 1982 sustaining the validity of the notification dated 4-8-1982, under S. 4(1) of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAfcons Infrastructure Ltd. Vs.rail Vikas Nigam Limited
Delhi
May-29-2017
Land Acquisition
% + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:29. 05.2017 ARB.P. 21/2017 AFCONS INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. ........ Petitioner Versus ..... Respondent RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED Advocates who appeared in this case: For...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Arif Azim Co. Ltd. versus M/S Micromax Informatics Fze
Supreme Court of India
Nov-07-2024
Arbitration
[2024]11S.C.R.1142; (2025) 9 SCC 750
Mr. R. Sathish, Mr. Mudit Sharma
[2024] 11 S.C.R. 1142 : 2024 INSC 850 M/s Arif Azim Co. Ltd. v. M/s Micromax Informatics Fze (Arbitration Petition No. 31 of 2023) 07 November 2024 [Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, CJI., J.B. Pardiwala* and Manoj...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Krishnamurthy and ors. Vs. Chairman, Departmental Promotion Committ ...
Chennai
Nov-07-1984
Service
(1985)2MLJ241
1. These appeals are directed against the common Judgment of Padmanabhan, J. in Writ Petitions Nos. 541, 10551 of 1981 and 6457 of 1982 dismissing the writ petitions with certain observations.2. The appellants joined the Defence...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRoger Shashoua Vs. Mukesh Sharma
Supreme Court of India
Jul-04-2017
Arbitration
Mukti Chowdhary
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 2841-2843 OF2017(@ S.L.P. (Civil) Nos. 22616-22618 of 2016) Roger Shashoua & Others …Appellant(s) Mukesh Sharma & Others …Respondent(s) Versus Dipak Misra, J.JUDGMENT...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMarriott International Inc. and ors. Vs. Ansal Hotels Limited and anr. ... Overruled
Delhi
Jul-05-2000
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(4) & (5) and 9
2000VIAD(Delhi)1003; AIR2000Delhi337; 2000(3)ARBLR369(Delhi); 86(2000)DLT873; 2000(56)DRJ435
Mr. Ashok Desai, Senior Advocate and; Ms. Bindu Saxena, Adv
ORDERS.K. Mahajan, J.1. By this appeal, the Appellants seek to challenge the order dated March 8, 1999 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby their application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »