Advanced Search Results
Goura Gobinda Das and Kamala Kanta Padhi Vs. State of Orissa
Orissa
Nov-18-1999
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 332; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3 and 3(1)
2000CriLJ1978; 2000(I)OLR38
Manoj Misra, A.S. Naidu, P. Mohanty, S.P. Choudhury, P. Sushadra, D.K. Patnaik, K.B. Kar and S.K. Nayak
P.K. Patra, J.1. These two Criminal Appeals are directed against the judgment dated 9.2.1994 passed by the Special Judge-cwm-Sessions Judge, Korapt, Jeypore in S.C. No. 192 of 1993, convicting the two appellants under Section 332/34 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNand Kishore Awasthi Vs. A.D.J., Court No. 16 and ors.
Allahabad
Aug-25-2006
Tenancy
2007(1)AWC173
Sri. Manoj Misra
ORDERAnjani Kumar, J.1. The short point that has been advanced by Sri Manoj Misra, learned Counsel for the petitioner is that the appellate authority as well as the prescribed authority while dealing with the application filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Samba Reddy Vs. State of Orissa
Orissa
May-02-2000
Criminal
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 7(1)
2000CriLJ4466; 2000(II)OLR107
S.K. Pradhan, Adv. on behalf of ;Manoj Misra, Adv.
P.K. Patra. J.1. The appellant has challenged the judgment dated 28.3.1991 passed by Shri G. Narasimham, Special Judge, Koraput, Jeypore in T.R. Case No. 8 of 1989 convicting him under Section 7(1)(a)(ii) of the Essential Commodities...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ram Murat S/O Shri Santoo Vs. Commissioner, Azamgarh Division,
Allahabad
May-25-2006
Election
Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 5; Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 2(14) and 24; Uttar Pradesh Scheduled Commodities (Regulation of Distribution) Order, 1990 - Sections 3 and 4; Uttar Pradesh Scheduled Commodities Distribution (Amendment) Order, 2004 - Sections 21, 27 and 28
2006(4)AWC3419
Ram Ravat, ;S.K. Singh, ;S.D. Dubey, ;Manoj Misra, ;R.J. Misra, ;J.P. Gupta, ;Deepak Jaiswal, ;Devendra Kumar, ;D.R. Azad, ;S.M. Iqbal, ;Irshad Ali, ;Rajendra Singh, ;Sufia Saba and ;Jyoti Bhushan, Ad
R.K. Rastogi, J.1. The petitioners in all these 32 writ petitions were licensees of the fair price shops. Their licences have been cancelled on the ground that either they themselves or their wives or other family...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHafiz Ullah Khan Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Nov-23-2009
Constitution
2010(1)AWC403
Sri. Manoj Misra
Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, J.1. Heard Sri Manoj Misra, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri R.K. Srivastava for respondent No. 5 and learned standing counsel for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3.2. The challenge is to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Kailasho W/O Badam Singh and Badam Singh S/O Gulab Singh Vs. Smt. ...
Allahabad
Jan-11-2007
Property
AIR2007All163; 2007(2)AWC1711
Shri. Manoj Misra
Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Shri Manoj Misra, learned Counsel for appellant. No one appears for the respondent.2. This second appeal arises out of OS 59 of 1972 for cancellation of the sale deed dated 6.3.1972, executed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManoj Alias Ghantoori Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Allahabad
Feb-27-1998
Criminal
Uttar Pradesh Goonda Act - Sections 3 and 4; Arms Act - Sections 25; Displaced Persons (Claims) Supplementary Act, 1954 - Sections 18 and 20; Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities Act - Sections 2, 3 and 4; National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 1, 3, 5A and 10; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 306, 307, 309, 323, 452, 504 and 506; Constitution of India - Article 226; Criminal Law Amendment Act - Sections 7
1998CriLJ4199
Manoj Misra, Adv.
N.S. Gupta, J.1. By means of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the pettioner Manoj alias Ghantoori has challenged the validity of detention order dated 19-6-1997, passed by the then District Magistrate,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMusharraf Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Allahabad
Mar-24-2011
CriminalConstitution
U.P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970 - Section 3, Clauses (a), (b) and(c) of sub-section (1) (3)
Manoj Misra, Adv
1. Heard Sri Manoj Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned AGA appearing for the State respondents and have perused the record. With consent of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKrishna Rao Keshav Vs. State of U.P. and anr.
Allahabad
Aug-14-1996
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 403, 405, 406, 409 and 420; Indian Copyright Act - Sections 63; Sales of Goods Act - Sections 45, 46 and 47; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 161, 177, 178 and 482
1997CriLJ1129
Manoj Misra, Adv.
ORDERI.M. Quddusi, J.1. The present petition under Section 482, Cr.P.C. has been filed with a. prayer for quashing of the proceedings in. case No.945 of 1994 pending in the Court of chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun between...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurya Deo Tyagi Vs. Chandradeo Tyagi and ors.
Allahabad
Nov-09-2005
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27; Constitution of India - Article 226
2006(2)AWC1090
Manoj Misra, Adv.
Anjani Kumar, J. 1. Heard Sri Manoj Misra, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri W. H. Khan, learned Counsel who has accepted notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 and 3 as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »