Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: m v deshpande · Page 1 of about 27 results (0.157 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 13 2001

Naseemunisa Begum D/O Shaikh YasIn and anr. Vs. Shaikh Abdul Rehman S/ ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-13-2001

Subject : CriminalFamily

Acts : Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 125, 125 to 127, 125 to 128, 397 and 397(7)

Reported in : 2002(2)MhLj115

Advocate for Appellant : S.V. Gangapurwala, ;Gulam Mustafa, ;M.V. Deshpande, ;A.H. Joshi, ;S.A. Kulkarni, ;S.R. Andhale and ;D.B. Yevatekar, Advs.

V.K. Barde, J.1. These Applications, Writ Petitions and Revision Application are placed before the Division Bench because of the reference made by the learned Single Judge. All these matters are arising out of the dispute with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 1999

Saroj W/O Maical @ Babasaheb Patole Vs. Maical @ Babasaheb Sadanana Pa ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-07-1999

Subject : Family

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10 and 17; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3

Reported in : 2000(2)ALLMR615; 2000(4)BomCR532; 2000(2)MhLj512

Advocate for Appellant : M.V. Deshpande, Adv.

ORDERV.K. Barde, J.1. This is reference under section 17 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (For short, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The learned Judge of the Family Court, Aurangabad, has passed the decree for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 2015

Sambha and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Feb-06-2015

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. M.V.Deshpande

Oral Judgment: 1. The applicants in Criminal Revision Application No. 75 of 2002 were convicted by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Nanded on 19.3.1999 in Regular Criminal Case No. 734 of 1995. They were convicted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 31 2006

Mohammed Abdul Hai Alias Farooq Pasha Vs. Saleha Khatoon and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-31-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 125 to 127; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2007CriLJ1394

Advocate for Appellant : Sarang Joshi, Adv. holding for ;M.V. Deshpande, Adv.;S.P. Daund, A.P.P. for No. 4

ORDERJ.H. Bhatia, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for Petitioner and Respondent No. 4. None for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.2. To state in brief the petitioner No. 1 married respondent No. 1 on 15-8-1982 and out of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 2009

Vithal S/O. Hullaji Hivre Vs. Sumanbai W/O. Vithal Hivre

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-03-2009

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 125; Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR566

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Dhase, Adv., h/f., ;M.V. Deshpande, Adv.

P.R. Borkar, J.1. This is an appeal preferred by the husband - original petitioner whose petition for divorce bearing H.M.P. No. 19 of 1984 though decreed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nanded, on 29.03.1986, said...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 2010

Bhagirath S/O Ramprasad Charkha Vs. Ramprasad S/O Chunilal, (Died) Thr ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-23-2010

Subject : Civil

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Sections 3, 41 and 58; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 20, Rule 12

Advocate for Appellant : M.V. Deshpande, Adv.,; holding for B.A. Darak, Adv.

P.R. Borkar, J.1. This second appeal is preferred by original Defendant No. 1 being aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the learned III Additional District Judge, Beed, in Regular Civil Appeal No. 151 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2007

Surjitsing S/O. Jeevansing Girniwale Vs. the Commissioner, Nanded Wagh ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-15-2007

Subject : Election

Acts : Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 10(1A), 10(1B), 10(1C), 10(1D), 11, 12, 16, 16(1), 16(2A), 267, 404, 405, 434; Maharashtra Local Authority Member's Disqualification Act, 1986; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966; Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Denotified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of Caste Certificate) Act, 2001 - Sections 10(4); Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act, 1987 - Sections 7; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 243V and 243ZG

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR554; 2007(2)BomCR617

Advocate for Appellant : P.V. Mandlik, Sr. Adv. and ;A.N. Ansari, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 4709 of 2006

B.R. Gavai, J.1. All these four petitions challenge the orders passed by the Commissioner of Nanded-Waghala Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'Corporation' for the sake of brevity), thereby declaring the petitioners to be disqualified under...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 2001

Ramchandra S/O Ukandaji, Died, Through L.Rs. Vs. Agricultural Produce ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-10-2001

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 92; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 - Sections 100

Reported in : 2001(3)ALLMR850; 2001(3)BomCR85

Advocate for Appellant : K.G. Nawander, Sr.C.

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. The brief background of the second appeal is that the respondent herein was the original plaintiff namely Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Nanded, had filed suit for recovery of possession of 3 plots shown...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2013

Dr. Kalpna W/O Pundlik Jamdade Vs. Assistant Municipal Commissioner, N ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on : Mar-13-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Oral Judgment: Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of parties, taken up for final hearing. 2. The petitioner's sonography centre is registered under provisions of the Pre-conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 08 1989

Sant Joginder Singh Kishinsingh and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-08-1989

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 126(2) and 126(4)

Reported in : 1989(3)BomCR458; (1989)91BOMLR807; 1989MhLJ819

Advocate for Appellant : Murar V. Deshpande, Adv.

B.N. Deshmukh, J.1. In this petition, the petitioners challenge acquisition proceedings initiated by notification issued under section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, read with section 126 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial