Advanced Search Results
Naseemunisa Begum D/O Shaikh YasIn and anr. Vs. Shaikh Abdul Rehman S/ ...
Mumbai
Mar-13-2001
CriminalFamily
Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 125, 125 to 127, 125 to 128, 397 and 397(7)
2002(2)MhLj115
S.V. Gangapurwala, ;Gulam Mustafa, ;M.V. Deshpande, ;A.H. Joshi, ;S.A. Kulkarni, ;S.R. Andhale and ;D.B. Yevatekar, Advs.
V.K. Barde, J.1. These Applications, Writ Petitions and Revision Application are placed before the Division Bench because of the reference made by the learned Single Judge. All these matters are arising out of the dispute with...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSaroj W/O Maical @ Babasaheb Patole Vs. Maical @ Babasaheb Sadanana Pa ...
Mumbai
Dec-07-1999
Family
Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10 and 17; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3
2000(2)ALLMR615; 2000(4)BomCR532; 2000(2)MhLj512
M.V. Deshpande, Adv.
ORDERV.K. Barde, J.1. This is reference under section 17 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (For short, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The learned Judge of the Family Court, Aurangabad, has passed the decree for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSambha and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai Aurangabad
Feb-06-2015
Criminal
Shri. M.V.Deshpande
Oral Judgment: 1. The applicants in Criminal Revision Application No. 75 of 2002 were convicted by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Nanded on 19.3.1999 in Regular Criminal Case No. 734 of 1995. They were convicted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mohammed Abdul Hai Alias Farooq Pasha Vs. Saleha Khatoon and ors.
Mumbai
Aug-31-2006
Criminal
Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 125 to 127; Constitution of India - Article 227
2007CriLJ1394
Sarang Joshi, Adv. holding for ;M.V. Deshpande, Adv.;S.P. Daund, A.P.P. for No. 4
ORDERJ.H. Bhatia, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for Petitioner and Respondent No. 4. None for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.2. To state in brief the petitioner No. 1 married respondent No. 1 on 15-8-1982 and out of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVithal S/O. Hullaji Hivre Vs. Sumanbai W/O. Vithal Hivre
Mumbai
Jul-03-2009
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 125; Constitution of India - Article 142
2009(4)BomCR566
R.P. Dhase, Adv., h/f., ;M.V. Deshpande, Adv.
P.R. Borkar, J.1. This is an appeal preferred by the husband - original petitioner whose petition for divorce bearing H.M.P. No. 19 of 1984 though decreed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nanded, on 29.03.1986, said...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhagirath S/O Ramprasad Charkha Vs. Ramprasad S/O Chunilal, (Died) Thr ...
Mumbai
Apr-23-2010
Civil
Transfer of Property Act - Sections 3, 41 and 58; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 20, Rule 12
M.V. Deshpande, Adv.,; holding for B.A. Darak, Adv.
P.R. Borkar, J.1. This second appeal is preferred by original Defendant No. 1 being aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed by the learned III Additional District Judge, Beed, in Regular Civil Appeal No. 151 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSurjitsing S/O. Jeevansing Girniwale Vs. the Commissioner, Nanded Wagh ...
Mumbai
Feb-15-2007
Election
Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 - Sections 10(1A), 10(1B), 10(1C), 10(1D), 11, 12, 16, 16(1), 16(2A), 267, 404, 405, 434; Maharashtra Local Authority Member's Disqualification Act, 1986; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966; Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Denotified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of Caste Certificate) Act, 2001 - Sections 10(4); Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Act, 1987 - Sections 7; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 243V and 243ZG
2007(2)ALLMR554; 2007(2)BomCR617
P.V. Mandlik, Sr. Adv. and ;A.N. Ansari, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 4709 of 2006
B.R. Gavai, J.1. All these four petitions challenge the orders passed by the Commissioner of Nanded-Waghala Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'Corporation' for the sake of brevity), thereby declaring the petitioners to be disqualified under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamchandra S/O Ukandaji, Died, Through L.Rs. Vs. Agricultural Produce ...
Mumbai
Jan-10-2001
CivilProperty
Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 92; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 - Sections 100
2001(3)ALLMR850; 2001(3)BomCR85
K.G. Nawander, Sr.C.
S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. The brief background of the second appeal is that the respondent herein was the original plaintiff namely Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Nanded, had filed suit for recovery of possession of 3 plots shown...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Kalpna W/O Pundlik Jamdade Vs. Assistant Municipal Commissioner, N ...
Mumbai Aurangabad
Mar-13-2013
Land Acquisition
Oral Judgment: Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of parties, taken up for final hearing. 2. The petitioner's sonography centre is registered under provisions of the Pre-conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSant Joginder Singh Kishinsingh and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ...
Mumbai
Feb-08-1989
CivilProperty
Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 126(2) and 126(4)
1989(3)BomCR458; (1989)91BOMLR807; 1989MhLJ819
Murar V. Deshpande, Adv.
B.N. Deshmukh, J.1. In this petition, the petitioners challenge acquisition proceedings initiated by notification issued under section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, read with section 126 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »