Advanced Search Results

Krishna Kashinath Patil Vs. S. Mohandas Kamath

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13(1); Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 2002(1)ALLMR353; 2002(2)MhLj924

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Karnik, Adv.

V.C. Daga, J.1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 17-11-1990, passed by the Additional District Judge, Thane, in Civil Appeal No. 101 of 1989, confirming the...

Jayshree Ramakant Khadilkar Pande Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

M.S. Karnik, J. 1. Heard Mr.Mihir Desai, learned Senior Counsel appointed Amicus Curiae, Mr.A.Y.Sakhare, learned Senior Counsel for respondent No.1, Mr.M.P.Jadhav, learned AGP for respondent no.2, Mr.Shekhar Naphade, learned Senior Counsel for respondent no.3, Mr.Aspi Chinoy,...

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Shrikrishna Jagannath Laskhare

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226, 227

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs.Thakur, Adv.

Judgment:1. Heard Mrs.Thakur, learned AGP for the petitioner and Mr.M.S.Karnik, learned counsel for the respondent.2. Rule. Respondent waives service.3. Petition is heard finally.4. This petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India...

Sarvjeet Chhotelal Tiwari alias S.C. Tiwari Vs. Union of India, throug ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Ravindra V. Ghuge J. 01. By an order dated 14/07/2006, this petition was admitted. 02. By this petition, the Petitioner seeks to challenge his “compulsory removal from service” effected by the Respondent employer dated 27/12/2001 and...

Rattan Suka Lilke Vs. State of MaharashtrA.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

ORAL JUDGMENT {PER A.M. THIPSAY, J.} : 1. The Appellant was the original Accused No.2 in Sessions Case No.211 of 2002, which was tried by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik. The learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted...

Kiran Rajaram Nimbalkar Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(3)BomCR987; 2007(4)MhLj775

Advocate for Appellant : P.J. Thorat, ;Atul Pande and ;N.B. Kalwaghe, Advs.

Savant R.M., J.1. Rule. Rule with consent of the parties made returnable forthwith and heard finally.2. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges his non-selection to the post...

Dr. Satish Dhanaji Pawar Director of Public Health and Another Vs. Dr. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Amit Borkar

Naresh H. Patil, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent. 2. Both these petitions challenge common judgment and order passed in original application no. 360/2012, original application no. 94/2013 and original application...

ICICI Bank Limited Vs. Anil Printers Limited and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Banking

Oral Judgment: 1. Admit. With the consent of the Learned Counsel for the parties heard forthwith. 2. The Revisionary Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked against the order dated 02.05.2015 passed by the Learned 7th Joint...

Girish Jantilal Vaghela Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : 2003(2)SLJ140(Bombay)

Advocate for Appellant : C.U. Singh, Adv., i/b., ;Naik, Adv.

D.B. Bhosale, J. 1. Rule. By consent rule is made returnable forthwith. Mr. M.S. Karnik, learned Counsel waives service for respondent No. 1 Mr. Girish Kulkarni, learned Counsel waives services for respondent No. 2. None for...

Runja Khandu Gaware, Decd. (Thru His Legal Heirs Bajirao Runja Gaware ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contract

Acts : Urban Land Ceiling and Regulation Act; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 53A; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 54; Specific Relief Act

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR4079; 2009(6)MhLj644

Advocate for Appellant : R.M. Haridas, Adv., i/b., Pramod N. Joshi, Adv. in S.A. No. 27 of 1991 and ;M.S. Karnik, Adv. in S.A. No. 429 of 1990

Nishita Mhatre, J.1. These two Second Appeals have been heard together since the facts involved in the Appeals are the same. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as they were before...