Advanced Search Results

Lalit Mohan Taran Vs. Lal Mohan Deb and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Palit and H.N. Kar, Advs.

K.N. Saikia, J.1. This plaintiffs second appeal is from the appellate judgment and decree of the Addl. District Judge, Tripura at Agartala dismissing the plaintiff's appeal and upholding the Munsiff's judgment and decree dismissing the suit....

Smt. Maharani Dey and ors. Vs. Debabrata Bardhan and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 22; Succession Act - Sections 306

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Lodh, H. Lodh and K.R. Dutta, Advs.

T.C. Das, J. 1. This petition is made under Section 115 of C.P.C. against the order dt. 7-3-79 passed by the learned Member, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal inMotor Accident Title Suit No. 7 of 1974 rejecting...

Kumari Arati Vs. Mecon Ltd. and Ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Education

1 W. P. (S) No. 5905 of 2006 In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ---- Kumari Arati D/o Sri Jawahar Lal, now posted Assistant Project Engineer, in the...

Sudhangshu Mohan Deb Vs. Smt. Nirode Sundari Deb Dhupi and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 144 - Order 39, Rule 1

Advocate for Appellant : M.C. Deb Roy, Adv.

Srivastava, J. 1. This is plaintiff's revision against the judgment and order dt. 30-6-1983 passed by the learned District Judge, West Tripura, whereby the plaintiff's appeal against the order dt. 30-5-1982 passed by the learned Additional...

Shiv Prasad Sahu Vs. Ranchi Kshetriya GramIn Bank

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Right to Information

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI WP(S)No.3370of2001 ShivPrasadSahu ... Petitioner Versus RanchiKshetriyaGraminBank ... ... Respondent CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :M/sR.Krishna&J.S.Tiwary FortheRespondent :M/s.M.M.Pal,Sr.Advocate,M.Palit& A.C.Mahto 925.7.2013 Herdlearnedcounselfortheparties.2. Thepetitionerisaggrievedbytheorderdated24.8.2000passed by the Chairman, Ranchi Kshetriya Gramin Bank and Disciplinary Authority, Annexure 6, by which the consolidated...

Niraj Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Education

INHIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 4966 of 2011 Niraj Kumar Singh ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA -----For the Petitioner...

Smt Praden Oraon Vs. Central Coal Field Limited Through Chairman Cum M ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P(S). No.330 of 2014 Smt. Parden Oraon ….... Petitioner Versus 1. Central Coalfields Limited through its Chairman cum Managing Director, Darbangha House, Ranchi 2. Director(Personnel) C.C.L, Ranchi 3....

Jamini Mohan Acherjee Vs. Santosh Kumar Roy

Court : Guwahati

Subject : ElectricityCivil

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 12(2)

Advocate for Appellant : P.M. Palit, Adv.

1. This revision petition is directed against an order passed on 4-10-1980 by the learned Sadar Munsiff, Agar-tala, in Title Suit No. 73 of 1978. By the impugned order the learned Munsiff in-juncted the defendant-petitioner not...

Suresh Ram and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Acts : Service Law; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2001(49)BLJR1612

Advocate for Appellant : M.M. Pal and; M. Palit, Advs.

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. In this writ application the petitioners have prayed for regularisation of their services on the ground, interalia, that they have been working since 1995 on regular basis...

P.K. Sengupta Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2005(4)JCR481(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : M.M. Pal,; N. Barla and; M. Palit, Advs.

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. In this writ application the petitioner is challenging the decision of the respondents-BCCL as contained in the letter dated 15/18th May, 1999 whereby the seniority of the petitioner vis-a-vis respondent No. 5, Smt....