Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: m a ansari · Page 1 of about 292 results (0.144 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 13 1999

Abdul Basheer Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-13-1999

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1) and 7(1); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108; Constitution of India - Article 22(5)

Reported in : 1999(5)BomCR423; 1999BomCR(Cri)423

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. A.M.Z. Ansari, Adv.

ORDERN. Arumugham, J.1. By filing the writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who is a friend of the detenu, by name, Shri Abbas Kacheri Kunnummal, has challenged the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 24 1998

ismail Shaikh Ali Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-24-1998

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 7(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 82, 83, 84 and 85; Constitution of India - Articles 22(5) and 226; National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 7

Reported in : 1998(5)BomCR671; (1998)2BOMLR719; 1998(2)MhLj727

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. A.M.Z. Ansari, Adv.

ORDERVishnu Sahai, J.1. Though this petition, preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner who is the next friend of the detenue Abdul Kadar Andunhi (a) Kamaruddin Puthu Parambi) Sayed Mohammed, hereinafter referred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2002

Shahnaz Javed Abdul Aziz Shaikh Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-28-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3(1); Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108 and 112; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 489(B) and 489(C); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161; Constitution of India - Articles 22(5) and 226

Reported in : 2002BomCR(Cri)853; 2002CriLJ2242

Advocate for Appellant : A.M.Z. Ansari, Adv.

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. Through this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner who describes herself as the wife of the detenu - Javed Abdul Aziz Shaikh alias Javed Munnlruddin Shaikh...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 14 1965

Panna Lal Vs. R.R. Sinha

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-14-1965

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 500; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 92, 496 and 561A

Reported in : AIR1967All394; 1967CriLJ980

Advocate for Appellant : Mool Behari Saxena and ;M.A. Ansari, Advs.

ORDERG. Kumar, J.1. Pannalal has filed this application for proceedings under Sections 3 and 4 of the Contempt of Courts Act against Sri R. K. Sinha, Sessions Judge, Fatehpur. In April 1960 the applicant had published...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 2026

Truth Fashion vs S.K Singh Special Commissioner & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-04-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.A. Ansari, Mr. Tabbassum Firduse Ahmad Ansari, Mr. Imran Ahmad

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 484/2025 TRUTH FASHION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.A. Ansari, Mr. Tabbassum Firduse Ahmad Ansari, Mr. Imran Ahmad, Advs.versusS.K SINGH SPECIAL COMMISSIONER...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2015

Bhura Vs. The State Govt. of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-10-2015

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.M. Ansari

$~12. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:10. 03.2015 BAIL APPLN. 463/2015 and Crl. M.A. No.3519/2015 BHURA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. M.M. Ansari, Advocate. versus THE STATE GOVT...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 1998

Narayan Madhavji Jat Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-05-1998

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1998)100BOMLR596

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. A. M. Z. Ansari

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. By this petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner who is a friend of the detenu Arvind Vyas, seeks to challenge the detention order dated 15.7.1996 passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 20 1971

Shervani Sugar Syndicate (Private) Ltd., Allahabad Vs. the Union of In ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-20-1971

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966

Reported in : AIR1972All71

Advocate for Appellant : M.A. Ansari, Adv.

ORDERB.N. Lokur, J.1. By a notification dated the 12th November, 1970, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Notification') the Central Government, in exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (3) of the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966, made...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 1977

Geep Flashlight Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-31-1977

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 3(1), 3(2), 4 and 4(4); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 10; Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excises (Amendment) Act, 1973

Reported in : 1979(4)ELT391(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. M.A. Ansari

D.M. Chandrashekhar, J.1. In these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution the short question that arises for detemination is whether the cost of packing dry cell batteries should be treated as a part of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 2016

Nafees vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-03-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.M. Ansari

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2272/2016 NAFEES Date of Decision: November 3rd, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M.M. Ansari, Advocate Versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI &...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial