Advanced Search Results

Schneider Electric India Private Limited Vs. Government of Nct of Delh ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 - Sections 39(5) and 43(5); Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 - Sections 74(1), 76, 76(1)(4) and 106; Customs and Excise Act; Municipal Corporation Development Act; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 128, 129 and 129E; Indian Electricity Act, 1910; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8(1); Delhi Sales Tax Rules, 1975 - Rule 11; Delhi Electricity Reforms (Transfer Scheme) Rules, 2001 - Rule 10(2); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 139(2007)DLT35; 2007(94)DRJ441; (2007)7VST79(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : V. Lakshmi Kumaran and; M.P. Devnath, Advs

1. In this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the prayer is for the issuance of an appropriate writ, direction or order staying the recovery of the entire demand of the impugned tax...

V.C. Rangadurai Vs. D. Gopalan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 30, 35, 37 and 38

Reported in : AIR1979SC281; (1979)1SCC308; [1979]1SCR1054; 1978(10)LC838(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : G.L. Sanghi and; A. T. M. Sampath, Advs

Krishna Iyer, J.1. We agree wholly with our learned brother Sen, J., that the appellant is guilty of gross professional misconduct and deserves condign punishment. But conventional penalties have their punitive limitations and flaws, viewed from...

Nuziveedu Seeds Pvt. Ltd Hyderabad Vs. the Protection of Plant Variety ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers

Advocate for Appellant : S. Niranjan Reddy, Adv.

ORDER: 1. This writ petition is instituted by a company involved in seed production. A writ of mandamus is solicited for declaring the advertisement of the 2nd respondent's applications in respect of MRC-7918, MRC-7041 BGII and...

Pepsi Foods Ltd. Vs. Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry of Fin ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise & Salt Act, 1944 - Sections 35F

Reported in : 1995IIIAD(Delhi)1401; 1995(33)DRJ368

Advocate for Appellant : V.L. Kumaran,; R.H. Pancholi,; Madan Lokur and;

D.P. Wadhwa, J.(1) This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is directed against the order dated 16 June 1994 read with order dated 21 October 1994 of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal,...

Kwality Printers Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1994)(73)ELT901TriDel

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. V. Lakshmi Kumaran

1. This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against impugned order dated 21-4-1986 passed by the Collector of Central Excise, Bombay.2. The appellants are engaged in the printing cartons. The Collector who adjudicated the proceedings...

K T Holidays Pvt Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V. Lakshmi Kumaran, Mr. M.P. Devnath, Mr. Abhishek Anand

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:29. 11.2013 W.P.(C) 7514/2013 & CMs 16078-79/2013 K T HOLIDAYS PVT LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. V. Lakshmi Kumaran, Mr. M.P. Devnath,...

Malleable Iron and Steel Castings Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1987)(12)LC823Tri(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. V. Lakshmi Kumaran Ld. Counsel

1. The appellants have preferred this appeal against the order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay dated 2nd March, 1983.2. The appellants have two factories--one at Kurla Andheri and the other at Lower Parel....

Telco Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1987)(11)LC609Tri(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. V. Lakshmi Kumaran

1. The revision application filed before the Government of India, on transfer to the Tribunal is being treated as an appeal.2. The appellants manufacture inter alia Commercial Motor Vehicles covered by Central Excise Tariff Item. 34....

M/S. Escorts Ltd. Vs. Commnr. of Central Excise, Faridabad

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. V. Lakshmi Kumaran

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.6561 OF2004M/S. ESCORTS LTD. …APPELLANT VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, FARIDABAD ...RESPONDENT WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.457 OF2006WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS.9469-9470 OF2010JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, J.C.A....

Paramount Sinters Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1991)LC129Tri(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Lakshmi Kumaran

1. All the above appeals pertain to-M/s. Paramount Sinters Private Limited, Nagpur. They are all clubbed together for the purpose of hearing and disposal as the question for determination in all the appeals is identical. The...