Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. N.J. Pavri
Mumbai
Feb-04-1999
Direct Taxation
(1999)153CTR(Bom)134
B.M. Chatteilee Mth R. V Desaiyb L.S. Shetty, for the Applicant J1). Mstlyhb Crawford Bayley & Co., for the Respondent
S.H. KAPADL4, J.:At the instance of the Department, the Tribunal has referred the following question for the opinion of this Court in respect of asst. yr. 1977-78, under s. 256(1) of the IT Act, 1961 :Whether,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Diners Business Services Pvt. Ltd.
Mumbai
Apr-17-2003
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 4 and 28
(2003)185CTR(Bom)623; [2003]263ITR1(Bom)
R.V. Desai and ;P.S. Jetley, Advs., i/b., ;L.S. Shetty, Adv.
S.H. Kapadia, J.1. During the accounting year ending March 31, 1987, relevant to the assessment year 1987-88, the assessee had let out a portion of its commercial premises in Bombay and Hyderabad to Diners Club India...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGawar Construction Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-29-2009
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 110, 110(2), 111 and 124
2009(111)BomLR4038; 2009(170)LC5(Bombay); 2009(243)ELT484(Bom)
L.S. Shetty, ;A.M. Sethna and ;Sachitra Shetty, Advs., i/b., L.S. Shetty and Associates
D.G. Karnik, J.1. Rule, by consent heard forthwith. The respondent No. 3 has not put any appearance though served.2. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a mandamus or a direction or order directing the Union of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Citibank N.A.
Mumbai
Apr-23-2003
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(42A), 45, 48 and 50
(2003)182CTR(Bom)635; [2003]261ITR570(Bom); 2003(4)MhLj283
R.V. Desai and ;P.S. Jetley, Advs., i/b., ;L.S. Shetty, Adv.
S.H. Kapadia, J.1. For the assessment year 1979-80, the Department has come by way of reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for our opinion on the question quoted hereinbelow :'Whether, on the facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. the Central Bank of India
Mumbai
Apr-17-2003
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act - Sections 18, 19, 20, 20(1), 20(2), 21, 30, 37, 80M and 256(1)
(2003)184CTR(Bom)225; [2003]264ITR522(Bom)
R.V. Desai, Sr. Counsel and ;P.S. Jetly, Adv., i/b., L.S. Shetty & Co.
S.H. Kapadia, J.1. By order dated 29/1/19981, the Tribunal has referred to this Court under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, the following question of law (which has been reframed by us) concerning Assessment Year 1970-71....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Bank of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Apr-17-2003
Direct Taxation
Interest Tax Act, 1974 - Sections 5; Income Tax Act - Sections 256(1)
2003(6)BomCR93; (2003)184CTR(Bom)138; [2003]264ITR568(Bom); 2004(1)MhLj111
R.V. Desai, Sr. Counsel and ;P.S. Jetley, Adv., i/b., L.S. Shetty, Adv.
S.H. Kapadia, J.1. The assessee is a Banking Company. The Assessment Years with which we are concerned with in this Reference are 1983-84 to 1986-87 for which the relevant accounting periods ended on 31st December of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Citibank N.A.
Mumbai
Apr-16-2003
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act - Sections 17(1), 17(3), 40A(5) and 256(1)
(2003)184CTR(Bom)228; [2003]264ITR18(Bom)
R.V. Desai, Sr. Counsel and ;P.S. Jetley, Adv., i/b., L.S. Shetty, Adv.
S.H. Kapadia, J.1. By Order dated 13th March 1995 passed by the Tribunal under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, the following three Question have been referred for our opinion arising during the Assessment Year 1978-79....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. the British Bank of Middle East
Mumbai
Apr-17-2003
Direct Taxation
Income-tax Act - Sections 40A(5) and 256(1); Income-tax Rules - Rule 3
(2003)183CTR(Bom)488; [2004]265ITR31(Bom)
R.V. Desai, Senior Counsel and ;P.S. Jetley, Adv., i/b., ;L.S. Shetty, Adv.
S.H. Kapadia, J. 1. For the assessment Year 1983-84, the Department has come by way of Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act for our opinion on the following three questions.'(1) Whether on the facts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Kotak Mahindra Finance Limited
Mumbai
Apr-30-2003
Direct Taxation
Companies Act, 1956; Income Tax Act - Sections 115J, 115J(1A), 207, 208 to 219, 234B and 234C
(2003)183CTR(Bom)491; [2004]265ITR119(Bom); 2003(3)MhLj876
R.V. Desai, Sr. Counsel and ;P.S. Jetly, Adv., i/b., L.S. Shetty, Adv.
S.H. Kapadia, J.1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 20/08/2001 passed by the Tribunal in Income-tax Appeal No. 9987/Bom/92 for Assessment Year 1989-90, the Department has come by way of appeal under Section 260A...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Emirates Commercial Bank Ltd. (Now Know ...
Mumbai
Apr-30-2003
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32A, 32A(2), 40A(5) and 44C
[2003]262ITR55(Bom)
R.V. Desai and ;P.S. Jetly, Advs., i/b., ;L.S. Shetty, Adv.
S.H. Kapadia J. 1. The Department has come by way of reference under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of the assessment years 1983-84 and 1984-85. The questions referred to us for our...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »