Advanced Search Results
All India Federation of Tax Practitioners Vs. Union of India
Mumbai
Feb-22-2001
Direct Taxation
[2001]116TAXMAN418(Bom)
Janak Dwarkadas, N.R. Jagtap, K. Shivaram, K. Gopal Pramod, K. Parida, Arvind Datar, Ms. R.A. Kothari, for the Petitioner Soli Sorabjee, S.B. Jaisinghani, R.V. Desai, J.P. Deodhar, Pradeep S.
Shah, J.In these two writ petitions under article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners who are Associations of tax practitioners, Chartered Accountants and architects challenge the constitutional validity of section 116 of the Finance (No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohanlal M. Patel Vs. Dy. Cit
Mumbai
Dec-11-2003
Direct Taxation
(2004)90TTJ(Mumbai)57
K Shivaram, for the Assessee S. Udayakumaran, for the Revenue.
ORDERR.V. Easwar, J.M.:These are cross-appeals arising out of the assessment made under section 158BC of the Income Tax Act in respect of the block period 1-4-1988 to 6-10-1998, which is the date on which a search...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNithyananda Swamy S Kora, vs the Government of Karnataka
Karnataka
Jul-18-2024
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JULY, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 14514 OF 2024 (LA-BDA)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Assistant Commissioner of Vs. NitIn Mukesh Mathur
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Apr-17-2002
Direct Taxation
(2002)83ITD641(Mum.)
1. The assessee, an individual, is aplay-back singer by profession.Four grounds have been raised by the Revenue in this appeal. Ground No.1 reads as under :- 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askincome-tax Officer Vs. Swastik Oil Products Mfg. Co.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Feb-05-1993
Direct Taxation
(1993)46ITD411(Mum.)
1. This is an appeal by the revenue against the order of the DCIT(A), for the assessment year 1989-90.2. The first dispute in this appeal is against the allowance of deduction under Sectin 32A of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Syncome Formulations (i) Ltd.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Mar-14-2007
Direct Taxation
(2007)106ITD193(Mum.)
1. This Special Bench has been constituted by the Hon'ble President of the Tribunal under Section 255(3) of the IT Act, 1961, to decide the following issue: Whether, on facts and in law, the assessee, while...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK Manjunath Vs. Smt J Rukhimini
Karnataka
Sep-27-2023
Land Acquisition
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.PRASANNA B.VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT APPEAL No.1318 OF2022(EXCISE) C/W WRIT...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt Savitha K R Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Karnataka
Sep-27-2023
Land Acquisition
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.PRASANNA B.VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT APPEAL No.1318 OF2022(EXCISE) C/W WRIT...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFiery Digital Imaging India Private Limited vs Indian Overseas Bank,
Karnataka
Feb-10-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 3783 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:FIERY DIGITAL IMAGING INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt Sharadamma vs Indian Overseas Bank
Karnataka
Dec-10-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 10393 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: SMT SHARADAMMA W/O. SRI. RAMAPPA REDDY....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »