Advanced Search Results

All India Federation of Tax Practitioners Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2001]116TAXMAN418(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Janak Dwarkadas, N.R. Jagtap, K. Shivaram, K. Gopal Pramod, K. Parida, Arvind Datar, Ms. R.A. Kothari, for the Petitioner Soli Sorabjee, S.B. Jaisinghani, R.V. Desai, J.P. Deodhar, Pradeep S.

Shah, J.In these two writ petitions under article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners who are Associations of tax practitioners, Chartered Accountants and architects challenge the constitutional validity of section 116 of the Finance (No....

Mohanlal M. Patel Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)90TTJ(Mumbai)57

Advocate for Appellant : K Shivaram, for the Assessee S. Udayakumaran, for the Revenue.

ORDERR.V. Easwar, J.M.:These are cross-appeals arising out of the assessment made under section 158BC of the Income Tax Act in respect of the block period 1-4-1988 to 6-10-1998, which is the date on which a search...

Assistant Commissioner of Vs. NitIn Mukesh Mathur

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2002)83ITD641(Mum.)

1. The assessee, an individual, is aplay-back singer by profession.Four grounds have been raised by the Revenue in this appeal. Ground No.1 reads as under :- 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the...

K Manjunath Vs. Smt J Rukhimini

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.PRASANNA B.VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT APPEAL No.1318 OF2022(EXCISE) C/W WRIT...

Smt Savitha K R Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.PRASANNA B.VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT APPEAL No.1318 OF2022(EXCISE) C/W WRIT...

income-tax Officer Vs. Swastik Oil Products Mfg. Co.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1993)46ITD411(Mum.)

1. This is an appeal by the revenue against the order of the DCIT(A), for the assessment year 1989-90.2. The first dispute in this appeal is against the allowance of deduction under Sectin 32A of the...

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Syncome Formulations (i) Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)106ITD193(Mum.)

1. This Special Bench has been constituted by the Hon'ble President of the Tribunal under Section 255(3) of the IT Act, 1961, to decide the following issue: Whether, on facts and in law, the assessee, while...

The Management Of Vs. Sri K Shivaram

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

W.P.No.17583/2017 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE4H DAY OF APRIL2022BEFORE R THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL WRIT PETITION NO.17583/2017 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN: THE MANAGEMENT OF KSRTC, 2ND DEPOT MANGALURU DIVISION BEJAJI,...

All India Federation of Tax Practitioners and anr. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77 and 78; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 1997(4)ALLMR709; [1997]228ITR68(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Soli E. Dastur, ;J.D. Mistry, ;V.H. Patil, ;K. Shivaram, ;V.B. Joshi and ;K. Gopal, Advs.;J.L. Daga, Adv.

M.B. Shah, C.J.1. The All India Federation of Tax Practitioners and a practising Advocate have filed this Petition for a declaration that ss. 64 to 78 of the Finance Act, 1997 are non est, void, unconstitutional...

All India Federation of Tax Practitioners and ors. and Indian Institut ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Acts : Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 - Sections 68 and 116; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1) and 246(1); Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Rule 6 and 6(3)

Reported in : (2001)168CTR(Bom)24; [2002]256ITR401(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : Janak Dwarkadas, Sr. Adv., ;N.R. Jagtap, ;K. Shivaram and ;K. Gopal Pramod K. Parida, Advs. for Petitioner in W.P. No. 142 of 1999, ;Avrind Datar and ;R.A. Kothari, Advs. i/b., S.D.D. and Phatarpekar,

A.P. Shah, J. 1. In these two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners who are associations of tax practitioners, chartered accountants and architects challenge the constitutional validity of Section 116...