Advanced Search Results

Kailash Narayan Deewan Vs. Baboolal Suresh Chand

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 23A and 23J; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115 and 116

Reported in : AIR1990MP262

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Tomar, Adv.

ORDERS.K. Dubey, J. 1. This revision under Section 23-E of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961, as amended (for short, the 'Act') has been preferred by the landlord-petitioner against an order dated 2-4-1986, passed by the...

Jai Narayan Durga Prasad Vs. Satyanarayan Alias Dhonbabu and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 90

Reported in : 1991(0)MPLJ768

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Tomar, Adv.

ORDERS.K. Dubey, J.1. This is a revision by the plaintiff /petitioner against an order dated 25th October 1990 passed in Civil Suit No. 27-A/1983 by Second Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Gwalior, whereby...

Omprakash Gupta (Dr.) Vs. Ram Prakash and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 12(1) and 23A; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control (Amendment) Act, 1985 - Sections 9; Court Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7 and 13

Reported in : 1993(0)MPLJ869

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Tomar, Adv.

ORDERS.K. Dubey, J. 1. This petition by landlord under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is for quashing of the order (Annexure P/10) passed in revision, preferred by the tenants, aggrieved of the order of...

Dr. Gopaldas and ors. Vs. Rajesh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1955 - Sections 4; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control (Amendment) Act, 1961 - Sections 12(1) and 13; Madhya Pradesh Public Trust Act - Sections 32

Reported in : 2006(1)MPHT53

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Jain, Sr. Adv. and ;U.K. Jain, Adv.

Subhash Samvatsar, J.1. This appeal is filed by the tenant challenging judgment and decree dated 29-1-1999 passed by Third Additional District Judge, Vidisha in Civil Appeal No. 3-A/96, whereby the First Appellate Court has confirmed the...

Jai Prakash Agrawal Vs. Anand Agrawal and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. D.D.Bansal

1. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution challenges the order dated 13.2.2015 passed by third Additional District Judge, Vidisha in Case No. 26A/13. 2. The respondents No. 1 to 3 filed a suit...

Shri Ramjanki Mandir Trust and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and or ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Public Trusts Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 25, 26, 27 and 27(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 92

Reported in : AIR1990MP41

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Tomar, Adv.

T.N. Singh, J. 1. On 15-1-1985, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Ater, in District Bhind, passed an order (Annexure A/3) constituting a trust in respect of 'Shri Ram-janki Mandir' and also appointed 'Trustees', evidently exercising his powers under...

Mahaveer Singh Tomar (Dr.) Vs. Marmagh Singh Sisodia and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9 and 20

Reported in : 1996(0)MPLJ369

Advocate for Appellant : A.H. Afsar and ;K.S. Tomar, Advs.

ORDERShacheendra Dwivedi, J.1. In this appeal, the order passed by the learned Eighth Additional Judge to the Court of District Judge, Gwalior, on 26-9-1994 in Civil Suit No. 76/94 thereby directing the return of the plaint...

Balkishan Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 3, 4, 6 and 6(1); Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : 1994(0)MPLJ381

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Tomar, Adv.

ORDERS.K. Chawla, J.Counsel name removed from here1. Accused Balkishan was convicted of the offences under Sections 454 and 380, Indian Penal Code and sentenced to R. I. for 6 months under each count, both the sentences...

Purushottam Das and ors. Vs. Anil Kumar and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 14, Rules 1 and 5 - Order 22, Rule 4 - Order 32, Rule 3; Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 12(1)

Reported in : 1999(1)MPLJ307

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Tomar, Adv.

ORDERS.P. Srivastava, J.1. Feeling aggrieved by the order passed by the First Appellate Court whereunder allowing the appeal of the defendants-tenants and setting aside the decree of eviction passed against them by the trial Court, the...

Rambir Singh and ors. Vs. Asha Kumari and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 12(1)

Reported in : 1997(1)MPLJ668

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Tomar, Adv.

T.S. Doabia, J.1. This second appeal has been preferred against concurrent finding recorded by the Courts below. The Courts below have concluded: that the respondent-plaintiff landlady does require the premises bona fide for her occupation as...