Advanced Search Results
Hukam Chand Chauhan Vs. Haryana State Industrial Corporation
Punjab and Haryana
Oct-04-1996
Property
(1997)117PLR482
K.S. Dadwal and; R.K. Khaira, Advs.
V.K. Bali, J.1. For the seeker of an industrial shed, this is a second bout of litigation. Petitioner Hukam Chand has been constrained to knock the doors of this Court for seeking an industrial shed which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPhuman Ram and ors. Vs. Munshi Ram and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Dec-03-2003
PropertyCivil
Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulations) Act, 1961 - Sections 2
(2004)137PLR606
K.S. Dadwal, Adv. for Appellant No. 3
M.M. Kumar, J.1. This is defendants appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity 'the Code') challenging the judgment of reversal passed by the learned District Judge, Hoshiarpur on 18.9.1984....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSohan Singh and anr. Vs. Bakhshish Kaur and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-31-2000
FamilyProperty
(2000)125PLR555
K.S. Dadwal, Adv.
Iqbal Singh, J.1. Plaintiff Gurmail Singh alias Gholi (since deceased and represented by respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in this appeal) filed the present suit for declaration with the consequential relief of injunction in respect of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Surjit Kaur and anr. Vs. Pritam Singh and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
May-08-2003
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 2A
(2003)135PLR161
K.S. Dadwal, Adv.
Viney Mittal, J.1. The present revision petition is directed against the order dated October 22, 2002 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Hoshiarpur, whereby the appeal filed by the plaintiff-respondents against the order dated April...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSantosh Tuli and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-06-1995
Service
(1995)111PLR373
K.S. Dadwal,; Balram Singh and; Rakesh Bhatia, Advs.
ORDERG.S. Singhvi, J. 1. This petition has been filed by Smt. Santosh Tuli and Ravi Bhushan Tuli for issue of a writ of mandamus to quash the impugned order Annexure P-3 and to give appointment to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSukhbir Kaur Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-24-1996
Civil
Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 23, Rule 1
(1997)116PLR161
Manohar Dadwal, Adv. for; K.S. Dadwal, Adv.
G.S. Singhvi and M.L. Singhal, JJ.1. This petition has been filed with the following prayers :'(i) records of the be called for and after perusing the same,(ii) an appropriate writ, order or direction specially writ in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLakhbir Singh Vs. Harpinder Singh and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
May-08-2003
PropertyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 2A
AIR2004P& H127
K.S. Dadwal, Adv.
ORDERViney Mittal, J.1. The present revision petition is directed against the order dated October 22, 2002 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Hoshiarpur, whereby the appeal filed by the plaintiff-respondents against the order dated April...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSantokh Singh Vs. Harcharan Singh and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-04-2006
Civil
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 58; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 and 151 - Order 6, Rule 17
(2006)143PLR377
K.S. Dadwal, Adv.
M.M. Kumar, J.1. The plaintiff has challenged order dated 12.4.1994 passed by Sub Judge, IInd Class, Hoshiarpur in this petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity 'the Code'). The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.R.i. Developers Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Dec-05-1997
Civil
Punjab Apartment and Property Regulation Act, 1995 - Sections 2(1)
(1998)118PLR389
K.S. Dadwal, Adv.
G.S. Singhvi, J.1. The common issue which arises for adjudication in these petitions relates to the validly of the orders passed by the Additional Chief Administrator (Mohali), exercising the powers of the competent authority, and the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTaru Ram Vs. State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-17-2001
CriminalFamily
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 307 and 498A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32
I(2002)DMC550
K.S. Dadwal, Adv.
H.S. Bedi, J.1. This appeal arises out of the following facts :Anjali (since deceased) had been married to Rakesh Kumar @ Bittu son of Taru Ram accused, about six months prior to the date of occurrence....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »