Advanced Search Results

income-tax Officer Vs. D. Manoharlal Kothari

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct TaxationCompany

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 192, 194A, 194A(1), 276B and 278D

Reported in : [1999]96CompCas275(Mad); (1999)155CTR(Mad)619; [1999]236ITR357(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K. Ramasamy, Adv. in Crl. R.C. No. 316 of 1989 and;K.A. Panchapagesan, Adv. in Crl. R.C. No. 849 of 1993

Rengasamy, J. 1. These revisions arise against the orders of the Principal Sessions Judge, City Civil Court, Madras, and also the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Madras.2. The Income-tax Officer, who is the revision petitioner in...

In Re: Convansys (India) P. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 94, 95, 97, 231 to 237, 297(1), 299, 301, 391 to 394, 542 and 543; Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999; Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934

Reported in : [2009]152CompCas148(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K. Ramasamy, Adv.

P. Jyothimani, J.1. These company petitions are preferred under Sections 391 - 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, for sanctioning the scheme of amalgamation of the transferor companies, the petitioners in C.P. Nos. 152 and 153...

A. Michael Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Chennai

Subject : FERA

Acts : Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 3, 4(1), 5, 6, 6(4), 6(5), 7, 8(1), 34, 35, 40, 49, 51, 52(3), 52(4), 54, 56, 57, 59, 63, 64(2) and 71; Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - Sections 35; Income Tax Act - Sections 253 and 256; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act - Sections 37; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1983 - Sections 138 and 142; Authentication Orders and Other Instruments Rules, 2002; Conditions of Services Rules - Rule 3

Reported in : [2009]96SCL321(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K. Ramasamy, Adv.

Prabha Sridevan, J.1. Heard Mr. B. Kumar, learned senior counsel appearing for the writ petitioners and respondents in the appeals and Mr. K. Ramasamy, learned Special Counsel for the respondents in the writ petitions and appellants...

Syed Ibrahim Vs. Income-tax Officer and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 159(6), 189(3) and (5), 271 and 275A; Income Tax (Amendment) Act, 1962- Sections 159 and 278B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 305

Reported in : 1998CriLJ2711; [1999]235ITR394(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Sundar, Adv. for ;sunder Mohan;K. Ramasamy, Adv.

M. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. The impugned order passed in Crl.M.P. No. 282 of 1996 in E.O.C.C. Nos. 263 to 265 of 1994, dated October 3, 1996, by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (E.O. II), Madras, fixing...

P. Muthusamy Vs. K. Arumugam and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Education

(Prayer:- This second appeal has been filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the Judgment and Decree of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Perundurai made in A.S.No.7 of 2011 dated 12.01.2012 reversing the judgment and decree of...

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Jawahar Mills Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2000]107TAXMAN574(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : K. Ramasamy for the Appellant Gopinath, for the Respondent

C.A. No. 64 7 of 19901. This appeal is preferred by the complainant, Assistant Commissioner, Salem, against the order of acquittal passed in F.O.C.C. No. 341 of 1989. The case of the complainant is that the...

State Bank of India Vs. The District

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:29. 07.2009 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.KARNAN Crl.O.P.No.23932 of 2002 and Crl.M.P.Nos.9999 and 10000 of 2002 G.Ganapathisubramanian .. Petitioner Versus The Chief Enforcement Officer, Enforcement Directorate, Government of...

J. Jayalalithaa Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of Wealth Tax

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 14, 14(1), 14(2), 15, 16, 16(2), 16(4), 16(5), 17, 17(1), 17A, 17(1A), 17(B), 30, 35, 35(B), 35O, 69, 271(1), 273A, 276C, 276CC, 277 and 279; Income Tax Act - Sections 120B, 139(1), 277 and 278E; Limitation Act, 1974; Mines Act - Sections 66; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 23, Rule 1; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 190, 190(1), 192, 200-203, 204, 245(2), 309, 397, 397(1), 401, 482 and 483; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 226 and 227; Wealth Tax Rules - Rule 3(1); Mines Regulations - Regulation 3

Reported in : 2009CriLJ3114; (2009)222CTR(Mad)470; [2009]309ITR277(Mad); [2009]179TAXMAN212(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : B. Sriramulu, Sr. Counsel for A. Navaneethakrishnan, Adv. in Crl.O.P. and ;Ravi Shankar Prasad, Sr. Counsel for A. Navaneethakrishnan, Adv.

ORDERK. Mohan Ram, J.1. Since common questions arise for consideration in the above Criminal Original Petition and in the above Criminal Revision Case both the cases are disposed of by this common order.2. The brief facts...

Kothari and Sons (industries) (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. M.V. Subramaniam, ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 245; IncomeTax Act, 1961 - Sections 69A, 245(D(4)) and (H), 276C, 277 and 278

Reported in : [1998]233ITR294(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : N.T. Vanamamalai, Adv.

N. Arumugham, J. 1. As the revision petitioners in both the above cases are almost the same and the respondent is also the same person and both the revisions involve the determination of a common question...