Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay Etc. Vs. M/S. Podar Cement Pvt. Ltd ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 22, 24, 27, 56, 64(2), 69(D), 93(2), 94(4), 154, 256, 257 and 288; Finance Act, 1987; Registration Act; Gift Tax Act - Sections 2; Old Income Tax Act - Sections 9 (1); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 14, 54, 55 and 269; Pakistan (Administration of Evacuee Property) Ordinance, 1949 - Sections 6(1); Rajasthan Land and Building Tax Act, 1964; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act - Sections 29(2)

Reported in : AIR1997SC2523; [1997]226ITR625(SC); JT1997(5)SC529; 1997(4)SCALE271; (1997)5SCC482; [1997]Supp1SCR394

Advocate for Appellant : K.N. Shukla,; R. Sathish,; K.N. Nagpal and;

ORDERK. Venkataswami. J.1. In all these cases the scope of Section 22 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called the 'Act') arises for consideration.2. Brief facts are necessary to appreciate the question that arises for...

Vellore Electric Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Madr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 57; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 28, 29 and 80I; Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 20

Reported in : [1997]227ITR557(SC); JT1997(6)SC413; 1997(4)SCALE627; (1997)6SCC705; [1997]Supp1SCR586

Advocate for Appellant : H.N. Salve,; Shrinivasamoorty,; K.N. Shukla,;

S.C. Agrawal, J. 1. These appeals filed by the assessee raise common questions for consideration. Civil Appeals Nos. 3333-3334 of 1981 relating to assessment years 1967-68 and 1968-69 have been filed against the judgment of the...

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Sardar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 294, 301, 302, 307, 320, 323, 452 and 506; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR2001SC3121; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)181; 2001CriLJ3984; 2001(3)Crimes344(SC); JT2001(6)SC41; 2001(4)SCALE548; (2001)6SCC433; [2001]3SCR1161

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K.N. Shukla, Sr. Adv.,; Ms. Geetanjali Mohan,; Ms. Bhar

S.S. Variava, J.1. These two appeals by special leave are directed against orders dated 28th June, 1996 and 17th July, 1996 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No. 490...

Gulam HussaIn and anr. Vs. State of Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302; Evidence Act - Sections 32

Reported in : 2000(2)ALD(Cri)433; 2000CriLJ3949; JT2000(8)SC466; 2000(5)SCALE430; (2000)7SCC254; [2000]Supp2SCR141

Advocate for Appellant : K.N. Shukla, Sr. Adv.,; Jagdev Singh Manhas, Adv. (A.C.),; A.S

R.P. Sethi, J.1. The appellant Ms. Shabnam is the wife, appellant Gulam Hussain, is the father-in-law, appellant Roshan is the brother-in-law and appellant Shakil Ahmad is the co-brother of the deceased Islamuddin who died on 13.10.1989...

Deena Nath Vs. Pooran Lal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 12(1) and 13; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR2001SC2655; JT2001(5)SC380; 2001(4)MPHT203; 2001(4)SCALE312; (2001)5SCC705; [2001]3SCR925; 2001(2)LC1148(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : K.N. Shukla, Sr. Adv. and; Shiv Sagar Tiwari, Adv

D.P. Mohapatra,J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal filed by special leave is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the High Court at Jabalpur in Second Appeal No.81/98 in which the Court set aside the concurrent...

indore Textiles Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company

Acts : Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 - Sections 18AA(1); Indore Textiles Limited (Upkram Ka Arjan Aur Antaran) Adhiniyam, 1986

Reported in : AIR1998SC1655; [1998]92CompCas182(SC); JT1998(2)SC221; (1998)IIIMLJ60(SC); 1998(2)SCALE127; (1998)3SCC525; [1998]2SCR1

Advocate for Appellant : G.L. Sanghi,; V.C. Mahajan and; K.N. Shukla, Senior Advs.,;

Kirpal, J.1. The acquisition of the undertaking of the Indore Textiles Ltd. by The Indore Textiles Limited (Upkaram Ka Arjan Aur Antaran) Adhiniyam, 1986, is under challenge in the writ petition and the appeal.2. M/s. Indore...

K. R. Patel Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1999)155CTR(SC)585

Advocate for Appellant : Buddy A. Ranganadhan, for the Appellant K.N. Shukla, K.C. Kaushik and S.K. Dwivedi, for the Respondent

Wadhwa, J.A Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay on a reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act') decided all the three questions of law referred to it...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Podar Cement (P) Ltd. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1997)141CTR(SC)67

K. VENKATASWAMI, J. :In all these cases the scope of s. 22 of the IT Act, 1961 (hereinafter called the Act) arises for consideration.2. Brief facts are necessary to appreciate the question that arises for our...

Aamenabai Tayebaly and ors. Vs. Competent Authority Under Safema and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Customs

Acts : Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 - Sections 2(2), 3, 6, 7, 7(3), 9, 10, 11; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 52

Reported in : AIR1998SC484; 1998(1)BLJR618; 1998CriLJ685; 1998(59)ECC21; [1998]230ITR892(SC); JT1997(9)SC200; 1997(7)SCALE64; (1998)1SCC703; [1997]Supp5SCR246

Advocate for Appellant : R.F. Nariman, Senior Adv.,; M. Karanjawala, Adv

S.B. Majmudar, J. 1. This appeal by special leave seeks to challenge judgment and order rendered by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Writ petition No. 2841 of 1982. By the impugned judgment...

K.C.P. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : JT1998(8)SC25; (1998)9SCC379

ORDER1. Leave granted. We have heard Shri K. Parasaran, learned Senior Counsel for the appellants and Shri K.N. Shukla, learned Senior Counsel for the contesting respondents-State authorities.2. Looking to the contention of the appellants that the...