Advanced Search Results

Vishnu Chandra Sharma Vs. Rcsat and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Acts : Rajasthan Forest Subordinate Service Rules, 1963 - Rules 21, 29, 29(3) and 29(3)(A)

Reported in : RLW2006(4)Raj2858; 2006(3)WLC558

Advocate for Appellant : Mahendra Singh, Adv.; J.K. Agrawal, Addl. GA

Ashok Parihar, J.1. Since on same set of facts, the order passed by the Tribunal is under challenge, both the writ petitions have been heard together and are being decided by this common order.2. Petitioner Vishnu...

Mining Engineer (Vig) Vs. Akhlesh Kumar Sharma and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 15, 17, 20, 20(6) and 21

Reported in : [2006(110)FLR801]; (2006)IIILLJ992Raj; 2006(3)WLC197

Advocate for Appellant : J.K. Agrawal, Adv.

Ashok Parihar, J.1. On an application filed by the respondent No. 1 (the concerned workman) under Section 15 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (hereinafter to be referred to as 'the Act'), a sum of...

Latoori Singh Vs. Chairman, Aligarh GramIn Bank

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976 - Sections 30; Aligarh Gramin Bank (Officers and Employees) Service Regulations, 2000 - Regulation 43

Reported in : (2004)ILLJ103All

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Varma and ;Yeshwant Varma, Advs.

Ashok Bhushan, J. 1. We have heard Sri S.N. Varma, senior advocate assisted by Sri Yeshwant Varma for the appellant and Sri I.M. Tripathi advocate for the respondent.2. This Special Appeal has been filed by the...

Chairman, Aligarh GramIn Bank Vs. Latoori Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Aligarh Gramin Bank (Officers and Employees) Service Regulations, 2000 - Regulations 2, 2(1), 38, 43 and 62

Reported in : (2003)2UPLBEC1267

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Verma and ;Yashwant Verma, Advs.

Ashok Bhushan, J.1. We have heard Sri S. N. Verma, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Yashwant Verma for the appellant and Sri I.M. Tripathi. Advocate for the respondent.2. This Special Appeal has been filed by the...

Tourist Approved Guide Association and ors. Vs. the Union of India (Uo ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 19(1); Ancient Monuments of Arehaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 - Sections 38; Ancient Monuments of Arehaeological Sites and Remains Rules, 1959 - Rule 8

Reported in : AIR1999MP178; 1999(1)MPLJ275

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Pancholi, Adv.

A.K. Mathur, C.J.1. By this petition, the petitioners have prayed for a direction annulling the scheme of enlisting licensing of touristguides and controlling and restricting their profession by mere executive fiat varying from time to time...

State of Madhya Pradesh Through Sho Vs. Mohan, Son of Mishri Lal,

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2009CriLJ4571; 2009(3)MPHT238

R.C. Mishra, J.1. The State is in appeal against acquittal of all the respondents in respect of the offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 302 and in the alternative of 302 read with 34 of the IPC...

Santokh Singh and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1988CriLJ1583

Ram Murti Rustogi, J.1. This judgment shall also govern the disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 36 of 1979,Darshan Singh v.State of Madhya Pradesh, as both the appeals arise i out of the same incident.2. The four...

B.P. Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226; Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 18, 23(1), 38 and 38(2); Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Rules, 1959 - Rule 8

Reported in : AIR2003SC3863; JT2003(7)SC159; 2003(6)SCALE498; (2003)7SCC309; 2004(1)SLJ331(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Amit S. Chadha and; Rekha Pandey, Advs

Brijesh Kumar, J. 1. The above-noted civil appeals involve the same question of fact and law hence, they are being disposed of by this common judgment. The appellants are Guides by profession and held identity cards...

Wg. Crd. (Retd.) V.A. Joshi and Others Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

A.K. Sikri, ACJ. 1. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners challenged the vires of the amendment to Clause 6 of Section M of Schedule II of the Aircraft Rules, 1937 published in GSR No.11...

Prahalad Vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : B. K. SATIJA __

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2043 OF2009PRAHLAD ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.983 OF2010JUDGMENT B.R. GAVAI, J.1. Both these appeals challenge the...