Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: ganpat ram · Page 1 of about 174 results (0.067 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 12 1988

Arun Keshav Gokhale Vs. Avinash Krishnaji Biniwale and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-12-1988

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13(1), 13(1)(L), 15 and 15A; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : AIR1988Bom424; (1988)90BOMLR110

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Gokhale, Adv.

ORDER1. Counsel for the parties heard2. The two Courts below have recorded a concurrent finding that the petitioner-defendant No. 1 acquired a plot of the area of 3,400 square feet and in the year 1975-76 he...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 1989

Khem Chand Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-09-1989

Subject : Service

Acts : Delhi Police Act, 1861 - Sections 7

Reported in : 1989(16)DRJ381

Advocate for Appellant : Sital,; A.K. Dhar and; Rajender Dutt, Advs

S.S. Chadha, J.(1) This appeal under Clause X of the Letters Patent is directed against the judgment dated September 29, 1978ofD.K.Kapur, J. dismissing the writ petition of the appellant seeking a writ of certiorari to quash...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 1991

Hari Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-13-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Arms Act - Sections 3, 25 and 27; ;Probation of Offenders Act; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 96,97, 100, 147, 148, 149, 300, 302, 304, 307, 323 and 324; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313

Reported in : 1992CriLJ3168; 1991(2)WLN402

Advocate for Appellant : Ganpat Ram,; Biri Singh and; R.S. Rathore, Advs.

V.S. Dave, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of Additional Sessions Judge, Kishangarbhas (Alwar) dated 25th April, 1989 in Sessions Case No. 49/1988, State v. Harim Ram and others convicting and sentencing the accused-appellant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 14 2011

G.L. Chawla and ors. Vs. State (Cbi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-14-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 420; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Section 5(1)(d); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 313

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. K.K. Sood; Mr. Pankaj Baghla; Mr. Sanchit Dhawan, Advs.

1. These appeals arise out of a common impugned judgment dated 4 th March, 1994 whereby the Appellants were convicted for offences punishable under Section 120B, read with Section 420 IPC and Section 5 (2) read...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 1989

Firm Ganpat Ram Rajkumar Vs. Kalu Ram and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-22-1989

Subject : Media and CommunicationTenancy

Acts : Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 - Sections 13(3); Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 20

Reported in : AIR1989SC2285; JT1989(Suppl1)SC258; 1989(2)SCALE692; 1989Supp(2)SCC418; [1989]Supp1SCR223

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Sanghi, Adv

Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.1. This application is by Kalu Ram and another, who were the respondents in Special Leave Petition No. 5597/87. The petitioner in the special leave petition was the firm, namely, Ganpat Ram Rajkumar. It...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 1981

Vinod Kumar and ors. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-09-1981

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1971 - Sections 397, 401 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 341, 380 and 451; Evidence Act - Sections 45 and 146

Reported in : 19(1981)DLT390

Advocate for Appellant : D.R. Sethi and; P.P. Grover, Advs

G.R. Luthra, J. (1) The present petition under Section 397 read with Sections 401 and 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the code) involves a question whether a prosecution witness in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 02 2026

Jaswant Singh vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-02-2026

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shannu Baghel, Mr. Aakash, Mr. Saksham Kumar, Mr. Ganpat Ram

$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 354/2026 JASWANT SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shannu Baghel, Mr. Aakash, Mr. Saksham Kumar and Mr. Ganpat Ram, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI &...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2026

Bajrang Pal vs the State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-07-2026

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shannu Baghel, Mr. Ganpat Ram, Mr. Aakash, Mr. Saksham Kumar, Ms. Disha Gupta, Mr. Shubham

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 08.12.2025Pronounced on : 07.01.2026Uploaded on : 08.01.2026+ CRL.A. 394/2023BAJRANG PAL .....Appellant Through: Mr. Shannu Baghel, Mr. Ganpat Ram, Mr. Aakash, Mr. Saksham Kumar,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2026

Arun & Ors. vs State Nct Govt of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-29-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Shannu Baghel, Mr. Ganpat Ram, Mr. Gorang Goyal, Mr. Sonam Tomar, Mr. Rahul Tyagi, Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Mr. Ankit Kumar Singh, Mr. Priyansh Raj Singh, Mr. Sachin Pal

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 28/2026 ARUN & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shannu Baghel, Mr. Ganpat Ram, Mr. Gorang Goyal, Mr. Sonam Tomar, Advocates alongwith P-1 to 7 in Person.versusSTATE...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 1997

T.N. Rai Vs. Rent Control Tribunal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-14-1997

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 3(2)

Reported in : 1997IIIAD(Delhi)579; 67(1997)DLT308; 1997(42)DRJ253

Advocate for Appellant : K.K. Rai and; Amita Gupta, Advs

Usha Mehra, J. (1) The impugned order dated 9th January,1997 passed by the Rent Control Tribunal (in short the Tribunal) thereby dismissing the appeal of the petitioner has been assailed primarily on the grounds, namely, (i)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial