Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: g chandra kumar · Page 1 of about 14 results (0.149 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 21 1985

S.B. Mamle Desai Vs. Controller of Estate Duty and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-21-1985

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Sections 64 and 64(7); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Interest Act, 1839 - Sections 1and 7

Reported in : [1985]155ITR667(KAR); [1985]155ITR667(Karn)

Advocate for Appellant : G. Chandra Kumar, Adv.

Puttaswamy, J.1. One Bullappa Basavanthappa Mamle Desai hereafter referred as B. M. Desai of Dharwad District who was the holder of certain 'watan' property within the meaning of that term occurring in s. 4 of Bombay...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 03 1971

Sharmila Jewellery and ors. Vs. the Assistant Collector of Central Exc ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-03-1971

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Gold Control Act, 1968 - Sections 27(5), 27(6), 80, 81 and 82; Gold Control Rules - Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1972Kant132; AIR1972Mys132

Advocate for Appellant : G. Chander Kumar, Adv.

Venkataswami, J.1. In these four petitions common questions have arisen for consideration, and, therefore, they are disposed of together by this common order. The petitioners applied for the grant of Dealer's Licences presumably under Section 27...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 1990

Doddaballapur Spinning Mills Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-29-1990

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173Q(1); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 11A, 12A and 33

Reported in : 1991(31)ECC379; 1992(61)ELT539(Kar); 1990(3)KarLJ431

Advocate for Appellant : Shri G. Chandra Kumar, Adv.

ORDERM.P. Chandrakantaraj Urs, J.1. The petitioner is the Doddabalapur Spinning Mills, Doddaballapur. In this petition under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution it has challenged the competence of respondent 1 to issue the show cause...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 26 1990

The Modern Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-26-1990

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 57K, 57-O and 57P

Reported in : 1991(32)ECC250; 1991LC458(Karnataka); 1991(55)ELT148(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : Sri G. Chandra Kumar, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner is a manufacturer of vegetable products. By virtue of Notification 27/87 dated 1-3-1987 the petitioner was entitled to set off on fixed vegetable oils used in the manufacture of vegetable products. The fixed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 1990

Shyam Sunder U. Nichani Vs. Asstt. Collector of C. Ex. and Customs

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-05-1990

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8, 8(1), 10, 10A, 73B, 173-A and 173B; Central Excise Act - Sections 11A

Reported in : 1991(33)ECC246; 1991(56)ELT5(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri G. Chandra Kumar, Adv.

1. The appellant herein filed writ petition No. 31525/1982 praying for quashing of the order Annexure-G, dated 24-7-1982 passed by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise withdrawing the classification list dated 26-11-1982 effective from 27-11-1981 approved...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 1997

Kirloskar Computer Service Ltd. Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-30-1997

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act - Sections 2 and 11C; Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985

Reported in : 1998(98)ELT355(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri G. Chandra Kumar, Adv.

ORDERShri Tirath S. Thakur, J. 1. In this petition for a writ of certiorari the petitioner company calls in question the validity of a Notice issued by the Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore; thereby the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 04 1992

S. Mageshwari Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax and Another

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-04-1992

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 139, 139(8), 147, 246 and 264; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (1993)109CTR(Kar)301; [1993]201ITR472(KAR); [1993]201ITR472(Karn); 1993(37)KarLJ137; [1993]67TAXMAN497(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : G. Chandra Kumar, Adv.

K.A. Swami, Actg. J.1. As the appeals lie in a very narrow compass, they are admitted and heard for final disposal. These two appeals are preferred against the order dated September 15, 1992, passed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 1990

Commissioner of Gift-tax Vs. Mrs. C.D. Muthanna

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-13-1990

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Gift Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 26(2)

Reported in : [1991]187ITR461(KAR); [1991]187ITR461(Karn); 1990(3)KarLJ487

Advocate for Appellant : G. Chandra Kumar, Adv.

Chandrakatraj Urs. J. 1. This petition is by the Revenue seeking an order of this court directing the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, Bangalore, to make a reference under section 26(2) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 1991

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-30-1991

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 15C; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 80J and 84

Reported in : [1994]205ITR511(KAR); [1994]205ITR511(Karn)

Advocate for Appellant : G. Chandra Kumar, Adv.

K. Shivashankar Bhat, J.1. The question referred to us under the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961, read thus : '(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 1999

M/S. Millipore (India) Private Limited, Bangalore Vs. Union of India a ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-24-1999

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 74(2) and 75

Reported in : 1999LC465(Karnataka); 1999(113)ELT62(Kar); 1999(5)KarLJ51

Advocate for Appellant : Sri G. Chandra Kumar, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner has claimed a refund of Rs. 91,908/- in respect of the machineries imported and re-exported in accordance with the provisions of Section 74 of the Customs Act. It is undisputed that the said...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial