Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: d v pathy · Page 1 of about 23 results (0.088 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 04 2000

B.K. Jaiswal and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : May-04-2000

Subject : Sales TaxConstitution

Acts : Bihar Finance Act, 1981; Income Tax Act - Sections 206C

Advocate for Appellant : K.N. Jain and Y.V. Giri, Sr. Advs., D.V. Pathy and Jyothi Saran, Advs.

Ravi S. Dhavan, C.J. and Aftab Alam, J. 1. The four writ petitions in this batch, which are quite identical to each other, seem to have taken a curious course. The writ petitions were filed challenging...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 2005

Neganum Suppliers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Sep-16-2005

Subject : Excise

Acts : Bihar Excise Act, 1915; Bihar Excise Rules - Rules 41, 42, 42A and 42B

Reported in : [2006(1)JCR53(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : D.V. Pathy and; Abhishek Kumar, Advs.

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. In this writ, application the only question that falls for consideration is as to whether affixing the Hologram on the bottles of foreign liquor by retail trader violates the provisions of Excise Act...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 2006

Hanuman Ram Mahabir Ram and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and an ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-08-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act - Sections 132(3), 226(3), 234A, 234B, 234B(4), 234C, 235D(6A), 245D, 245D(6) and 245D(6A)

Advocate for Appellant : D.V. Pathy, Adv.

1. Hanuman Ram Mahabir Ram (petitioner No. 1) is a partnership firm of which Mohan Lal Gupta (petitioner No. 2) is one of the several partners. The petitioners and the Revenue are in dispute over the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 06 2013

Vishal Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Mar-06-2013

Subject : Education

the State has any intention to promote the cooperative movement in the State of Jharkhand. List this matter on 8.04.2013. A copy of this order be given to learned counsel for the State. (Prakash Tatia,C.J.) (Jaya...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2013

Tata Steel Limited (Previously Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Mar-06-2013

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI T.A. No. 37 of 2010 with I.A. No.466 of 2013 Tata Steel Limited ...... Appellant Vrs. Commissioner of Central Excise & another ...... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2009

Birla Corporation Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Oct-07-2009

Subject : Sales Tax/Vat

Reported in : (2009)26VST471(Patna)

1. Whether a dealer under the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as, 'the Act') against whom neither any tax is found payable nor is due, could be subjected to the penal provisions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2007

Omec Engineers Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Sep-18-2007

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)217CTR(Jharkhand)144; [2008(1)JCR221(Jhr)]

M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. In the instant case, the Tribunal referred the following question of law under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for opinion by this Court:Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2008

Badal Jaiswal, Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jan-24-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bihar Excise Act - Sections 35 and 69; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 272 and 273

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR1364; 2008CriLJ2537; [2008(2)JCR419(Jhr)]

Advocate for Appellant : D.V. Pathy and; Abhisekh Kumar, Advs.

Amareshwar Sahay, J.1. All the three writ applications arise out of the same F.I.R. and, as such, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.2. All the above mentioned writ petitions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2002

Kumar Films Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Sep-12-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 142, 142(2A), 143, 144 and 158BC; Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Appellant : D.V. Pathy, Adv.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner has filed the present writ application challenging the order dated June 28, 2002 (annexure 1 to the writ application), by which appointment of an auditor to audit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 2003

Deep Narayan Gupta Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-02-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 119(2), 237, and 239(2)

Advocate for Appellant : D.V. Pathy, Adv.

1. Both the matters are connected ones and as such they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. By order dated January 30, 2003, the Central Board of Direct...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial