Full Judgment
the State has any intention to promote the cooperative movement in the State of Jharkhand. List this matter on 8.04.2013. A copy of this order be given to learned counsel for the State. (Prakash Tatia,C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.) Sudhir IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI T.A. No. 37 of 2010 with I.A. No.466 of 2013 Tata Steel Limited ...... Appellant Vrs. Commissioner of Central Excise & another ...... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Appellant: M/s D.V. Pathy For the Respondents: Mr. Ratnesh Kumar, Adv. ------ Order No.10 Dated 06th March, 2013. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Admit. List this matter for hearing at its own turn. However, no ground is made out for interim relief and, therefore, interim prayer is rejected. I.A. No. 466 of 2013 is dismissed. (Prakash Tatia,C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.) Sudhir IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 1366 of 2013 Tata Hitachi Construction Machinery Company Limited ... Petitioner Vrs. Union of India and others ...... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioner: Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Adv. For the Respondents: Mr. Ratnesh Kumar, Adv. ------ Order No.2 Dated 06th March, 2013. List this case along with W.P.(T) No. 508 of 2013 and connected matters. Meanwhile, no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner till disposal of the appeal or the application for interim relief before the appellate authority. However, it is made clear that the appellate authority will be free to proceed and decide the appeal and if not possible, then may pass appropriate order for interim relief. (Prakash Tatia,C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.) Sudhir IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 263 of 2012 with I.A. No. 3392 of 2012 Superintendent of Police, Koderma ...... Appellant Vrs. 1.Hemraj Prasad Mehta 2.Mithilesh Prasad Mehta 3.The State of Jharkhand 4. Director General of Police, Ranchi, Jharkhand 5. Dy. Inspector General of Police, Ranchi(Personnel) 6. Superintendent of Police, Hazaribagh 7. Superintendent of Police, Chatra 8. Superintendent of Police, Giridih ...... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Appellant: M/s Santosh Kumar For the Respondents: Mr. Binod Kr. Dubey, Adv. ------ Dated 06th March, 2013. Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application for condonation of delay being I.A. No.3392 of 2012. In view of the reasons stated in the application for condonation of delay, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. I.A. No. 3392 of 2012 is allowed. Heard learned counsel for the parties on merit. Admittedly, a number of persons have been given appointment on the post of constables who applied for two districts and the petitioners have been denied the appointment only on this ground. Not only this, even other writ petitions were also allowed in pursuance of which further appointments have been given. Therefore, the petitioners have been discriminated and learned Single Judge has rightly allowed the writ petition. We do not find any merit in this appeal which is, accordingly, dismissed. (Prakash Tatia,C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.) Sudhir IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Review No. 92 of 2011 Central Coalfields Limited ...... Petitioner Vrs. The State of Jharkhand & others ...... Respondents with W.P.(T) No.2843 of 2010 Central Coalfields Limited ...... Petitioner Vrs. The State of Jharkhand & others ...... Respondents with W.P.(T) No.2611 of 2010 Central Coalfields Limited ...... Petitioner Vrs. The State of Jharkhand & others ...... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioner: Mr. B. Poddar, Adv.(In W.P.(T) Nos. 2843/11 and 2611/10) Mr. A.K. Das, Adv. (In Civil Review No. 92/11) For the Respondents: Mr. Rajesh Shankar, S.C.I J.C. to A.G. ------ Order No.7 Dated 06th March, 2013. In Civil Review No. 92 of 2011 This review petition is required to be listed before the Bench in which one of the members will be Hon'ble Mr. Justice D.N. Patel. Therefore, list this matter before the appropriate Bench. In W.P.(T) Nos. 2843 of 2010 & 2611 of 2010 In these matters, according to learned counsel for the petitioners, the outcome of the order passed in Civil Review No. 92 of 2011 may have material bearings on the fate of the writ petitions. Therefore, the above writ petitions, which are tagged with the Civil Review No. 92 of 2011, be also placed with the said Civil Review petition. (Prakash Tatia,C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.) Sudhir IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(PIL) No. - of 201 ...... Petitioner Vrs. & others ...... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioner: For the Respondents: ------ Dated 07th March, 2013. No one a (Prakash Tatia,C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.) Sudhir W.P.(PIL) No. 2590 o”
0. 01.3.2013 Respondent-Dhanbad Municipal Corporation, Dhanbad may file the counter affidavit within a period of three weeks. List this matter after three weeks. (Prakash Tatia,C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.)