Advanced Search Results

Mahipal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Service

Reported in : (2004)3UPLBEC128

Advocate for Appellant : D.S. Patni, Adv.

Rajesh Tandon, J.1. Heard Sh. D.S. Patni learned Counsel for the petitioner and Standing Counsel for the respondents.2. By the present writ petition the petitioner has prayed for the issue of a writ, order of direction...

Cit Vs. Chief Officer, Zonal Officer, State Bank of India

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2006]155TAXMAN477(NULL)

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Posti, for the Appellant D.S. Patni, for the Respondent.

ORDERJ.C.S. Rawat, J. Since similar points of dispute are involved in all these appeals, therefore, they are being disposed of by this common order.2. These appeals have been filed by the appellants against the common order...

ishwari Singh Rautela Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Service

Tarun Agarwala, J.1. Heard Mr. Sharad Sharma, the learned Senior Counsel duly assisted by Ms. Indu Sharma, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. D.S. Patni and Mr. A.S. Bisht, the learned Counsel for the respondent...

Dinesh Kumar Sharma Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921; Allahabad High Court Rules - Rule 5; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Regulations - Regulation 3(1)

Reported in : AIR2005Utr61

Advocate for Appellant : Gopal Narain, Adv.

Cyriac Joseph, C.J.1. This Special Appeal is filed against the judgment dated 31-8-2004 rendered by a learned single Judge of this Court in civil Writ Petition No. 1190(S/S) of 2003. The appellant was the fifth respondent...

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Prahalad Giri Goswami and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2008ACJ2378

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Amish Tiwari

B.C. Kandpal, J.1. Both these appeals arise out of same accident and the facts of both the cases are similar, therefore, both these appeals are being heard together and decided by this common judgment. For the...

Subhash Chand Joshi Vs. Mahesh Chandra Joshi and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : II(2007)ACC422

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Deepak Rawat

Rajeev Gupta, C.J.1. On due consideration, application for the condonation of delay is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is hereby condoned.2. With the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, the appeal...

Pushpa Devi and ors. Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Motor VehiclesInsurance

Reported in : 2007ACJ2852

Rajeev Gupta, C.J.1. This is claimants' appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the award dated 19.3.2002 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/District Judge, Tehri Garhwal in Motor Accident Claim Petition...

Smt. Saleeman Vs. Brijesh Kumar Maheshwari and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC1376(UHC)

Advocate for Appellant : Manish Dalakoti, Adv.

Rajesh Tandon, J.1. Heard Sri Manish Dalakoti, learned counsel for the appellant/claimant and Ms. Seema Sirohi, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 and Sri D.S. Patni, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2.2. This is...

Rajiv Rawal and anr. Vs. Man Singh and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Motor VehiclesInsurance

Reported in : 2008ACJ399

Rajeev Gupta, C.J.v This is claimants' appeal for enhancement of the compensation awarded by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar vide award dated 3.1.2005 passed in M.A.C.P. No. 135 of 2003.2. The claimants,...

Smt. Ramesh Rani and ors. Vs. Shantanu Das and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 158(6) and 166

Reported in : 2005(4)AWC3112(UHC)

Advocate for Appellant : Prabhat Pandey, Adv.

Rajesh Tandon, J.1. Heard Prabhat Pandey, learned Counsel for the appellant and Sri D. S. Patni, learned Counsel for the respondents.2. This is an appeal arising out: of the judgment and order dated 19.9.2000 passed by...