Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: chitra sampath · Page 1 of about 119 results (0.058 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 30 2004

All India Other Backward Community Association (Regn. No. 291/94 Ms) R ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-30-2004

Subject : CivilService

Acts : Madras Local Boards Act, 1920 - Sections 5(1); ;Profession Tax Act - Sections 3(4)

Reported in : (2004)3MLJ676

Advocate for Appellant : Chitra Sampath, Adv.

N.V. Balasubramanian, J. 1. These two writ appeals, W.A. Nos. 1672 of 1999 and 1887 of 1999 are preferred against the common order dated 12.8.1999 made in W.P. Nos. 13236 and 13237 of 1999 respectively. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2001

Karuthakkan Nadar Vs. the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Represented by ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-19-2001

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (2001)1MLJ833

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. Chitra Sampath

ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J.1. Being aggrieved by the fair and decretal order dated 17.4.1998 made in I.A. No. 22 of 1998 in A.S. No. 9 of 1995 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Tirunelveli, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2010

G. Alayamani S/O Gopal Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Secreta ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-24-2010

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994 - Sections 33, 78, 89, 90, 94, 207, 207(1), 207(3), 207(5), 207(6), 207(12), 212, 212(1) to 212(15), 242 and 242(2); ;Andhra Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1965 - Section 46 and 46(9); ;Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958; ;Tamil Nadu Panchayat (Election) Rules, 1995 - Rule 78; ;Tamil Nadu Panchayats (Procedure for Convening and Conduct of Meetings of Panchayat Union Council and its Committees) Rules, 1999 - Rules 3(3), 7, 9 and 14; ;Bombay Village Panchayats (Meeting) Rules, 1959 - Rule 29(1)

Advocate for Appellant : Chitra Sampath, Adv.

H.L. Gokhale, C.J.1. The appeal seeks to challenge the order passed by a learned single Judge whereby the learned single Judge by her order dated 2nd February, 2010 dismissed the petition filed by the appellant herein....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 13 2002

Lakshmi Ammal Vs. Thillai Natarajamurthi

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-13-2002

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Limitation Act - Schedule - Article 61; Tamil Nadu Agriculturists Relief (Amendment) Act, 1973; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 62; Debt Reliefs Act; Uttar Pradesh Agriculturists Relief Act, 1934 - Sections 12

Reported in : (2002)3MLJ629

Advocate for Appellant : Chitra Sampath, Adv.

K. Sampath, J.1. The defendant in O.S.No.350/83 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Padmanabhapuram, is the appellant in the second appeal. The respondent herein filed the suit for redemption, partition and future profits on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2012

K. Udhayakumar Vs. Shri Ramdhas Finance Private Ltd. Rep by Its Direct ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-17-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : For the Petitioner : Mrs. Chitra Sampath, Sr. Counsel for T.S. Baskaran, Advocate. For the Respondent: R. Vishnu, Advocate.

(Second appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code to set aside the judgment and decree of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC-IV) Chennai, dated 30.09.2009 made in A.S.No.458 of 2005 confirming...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 2005

V. Mohanan and V. Ramesh Vs. K. Thanickachalam,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-05-2005

Subject : CivilProperty

Reported in : (2005)2MLJ530

Advocate for Appellant : Chitra Sampath, Adv.

P. Sathasivam, J.1. The above original side appeal has been filed against the order of the learned single Judge dated 16.11.2004 made in Original Application No. 696 of 2004 in C.S. No. 685 of 2004, in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 16 2002

Suryagandhi Vs. Lourduswamy

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-16-2002

Subject : PropertyContract

Acts : Indian Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 29(2) - Schedule - Article 54; Indian Contract Act; Negotiable Instruments Act; Portuguese Civil Code - Article 535; Limitation Act, 1908; Pondicherry Limitation (Repeal of Local Laws) Act, 1994 - Sections 3 and 4; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 20 and 20(1)

Reported in : AIR2004Mad8; 2003(1)ARBLR234(Madras); (2002)3MLJ788

Advocate for Appellant : Chitra Sampath, Adv. for ;T.R. Rajaraman, Adv.

E. Padmanabhan, J.1. The second appeal has been preferred by the defendant in O.S.No.253 of 1989 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Pondichery being aggrieved by the judgement and decree of the Learned II...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2002

P.S. Mohamed Ali and Five ors. Vs. S. Govindan and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-26-2002

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 19

Reported in : (2002)3MLJ644

Advocate for Appellant : Chitra Sampath, Adv.

ORDERP.D. Dinakaran, J.1. The revision petitioners, who are tenants, are the respondents in R.C.O.P.Nos. 9 and 10 of 1999 before the learned Rent Controller, Tiruvannamalai, laid by the respondents herein for eviction of the revision petitioners...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 1993

Paul Samuel Alias Paulraj Samuel and anr. Vs. Koil Pitchai Anandhadura ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-23-1993

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1993)2MLJ109

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. Chitra Sampath

ORDERPratap Singh, J.1. The revision is directed against the order in I.A. No. 921 of 1992 in O.S. No. 25 of 1986 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Tuticorin, allowing the said application filed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 2006

Pandurangam Vs. Annammal

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-22-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35, 114 and 157

Reported in : (2006)4MLJ1758

Advocate for Appellant : Chitra Sampath, Adv.

M. Thanikachalam, J.1. The unsuccessful defendant before the Courts below concurrently is the appellant.2. The respondent as plaintiff filed the suit for partition and separate possession of her alleged 1/2 share in the suit properties on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial