Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: chander kumar · Page 1 of about 214 results (0.106 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 17 1996

Sunshine Tubes Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Customs and Another

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-17-1996

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1997(57)ECC136; 1997(91)ELT296(Kar); ILR1996KAR2644; 1996(6)KarLJ643

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Rajesh Chander Kumar, Adv.

ORDER1. In this case, the petitioner company is aggrieved by the orders dated 1-6-1994 (Annexure-F) and 15-12-1995 (Annexure-H) passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal under Section 35F of Central Excises and Salt...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 1990

Engineering Systems (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-29-1990

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 33 and 35F; Central Excises Rules, 1944 - Rules 4 and 5

Reported in : 1991(33)ECC160; 1992(57)ELT12(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : Shri G. Chander Kumar, Sr. Standing Counsel, ;Shri S.R. Shivaprakash and ;Shri R. Narayana, Advs.

ORDER1. In W.P. No. 3113/1986 : Petitioner is M/s. Engineering Systems (P) Ltd. The petitioner has challenged the validity and legality of the original order passed by the Additional Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore, bearing No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 1989

John Shalex Paints Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-28-1989

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1990(26)ECC183

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Chander Kumar

ORDERS.R. Rajasekara Murthy, J.1. The petitioner is a manufacturer of paints, pigments, colours, varnishes, etc. Among the several items manufactured by the petitioner, 'Super Blucem' used as a decorative water-proof cement, is one of the items...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 27 2009

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Agrotech Foods Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-27-2009

Subject : Customs

Acts : Central Excise Act - Sections 11B; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 15(1), 18, 18(2), 25(2), 27, 27(2), 28 and 28C; Central Excise and Customs Laws (Amendment) Act, 1991

Reported in : 2010(249)ELT348(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : T.M. Venkatareddy, Adv.

Aravind Kumar, J.1. The Revenue is in appeal questioning the order of the CESTAT dated 11-2-2005 passed in appeal No. C/4/2003, final order No. 213/2004 where under the Tribunal has allowed the appeal filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 1990

Engineering Systems (P) Ltd. Vs. Additional Collector of Central Excis ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-29-1990

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excises and Salt Act, Sections 11A (2), 33, 24, 2 (b) 35F, 38, 5A, 11C; Rules, 1944, 173Q (1), 92, 9(2),4,5

Reported in : 1991(36)LC508(Karnataka)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Chander Kumar

ORDER1. In W.P. No. 3113/1986: Petitioner is M/s. Engineering Systems (P) Ltd. The petitioner has challenged the validity and legality of the original order passed by the Additional Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore, bearing No. C....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 1998

Wipro Infotech Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (intel ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-16-1998

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 366 and 366(29A); Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2 and 5B

Reported in : ILR1999KAR768; [2000]120STC159(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : Chander Kumar, Sr. Counsel, ;Rajesh Chander Kumar and ;S. Parthasarathi, Advs. in W.P. Nos. 13582 to 13586 of 1993, ;Ajit Kumar L. Raheja, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 18435, 18436 and 6916 of 1994 and ;M.R. Nar

ORDERP. Vishwanatha Shetty, J.1. Since the common questions of law are raised in these petitions and the contentions urged are fairly similar, all these petitions were heard together and are disposed of by this common order.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 1986

Precision Telecom Products Vs. Superintendent of Central Excise and or ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-12-1986

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8 and 8(1)

Reported in : 1986(9)ECC25; 1986(24)ELT235(Kar)

Advocate for Appellant : D. Prakash Rao, Adv. (By Chander Kumar, Adv.)

ORDER1. M/s. Precision Telecom Products, Bangalore, which is the petitioner before us, is a partnership firm of partners engaged in the manufacture of transmitters and other components for telephones that are ultimately manufactured by the Indian...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 1991

Gurupriya Tele Auto (P) Ltd. Vs. Supdt. of Central Excise

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-23-1991

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 10, 11, 52, 173B, 173B(2), 173B(9), 173C, 173G(3) and 173-I ; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 11A, 11A(1), 11B, 35, 35A, 35E, 35E(2) and 35EE

Reported in : 1992(37)ECC62; 1992(58)ELT361(Kar); ILR1992KAR605

Advocate for Appellant : Shri G. Chander Kumar, Adv.

ORDERShivashankar Bhat, J. 1. The petitioner is a manufacturer of the goods referred by the petitioner as 'Telephone Dial' for telephone apparatus/instrument. The question raised in this Writ Petition involves the interpretation of Section 11A of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 1971

Indian Telephone Industries Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Income-tax O ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-21-1971

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 139, 139(1), 139(2), 143(3), 147, 148 and 271(4A)

Reported in : [1972]86ITR566(KAR); [1972]86ITR566(Karn)

Advocate for Appellant : G. Chander Kumar, Adv.

Govinda Bhat, J. 1. The Indian Telephone Industries Co-operative Society Ltd. is the petitioner in this batch of seven writ petitions. They relate to the assessments made on the petitioner under the Income-tax Act, 1961, hereinafter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 1993

Bhoruka Aluminium Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-18-1993

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1993(43)ECC40; 1993LC531(Karnataka); 1993(67)ELT276(Kar); ILR1993KAR1150; 1993(2)KarLJ84

Advocate for Appellant : Shri G. Chander Kumar, Adv.

K.A. Swami, Acting C.J.1. This appeal is preferred against the order dated 3-2-19993 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 21339 of 1989 on the interlocutory application filed by the respondents for extension...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial