Advanced Search Results
Sunshine Tubes Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Customs and Another
Karnataka
Jun-17-1996
Excise
1997(57)ECC136; 1997(91)ELT296(Kar); ILR1996KAR2644; 1996(6)KarLJ643
Shri Rajesh Chander Kumar, Adv.
ORDER1. In this case, the petitioner company is aggrieved by the orders dated 1-6-1994 (Annexure-F) and 15-12-1995 (Annexure-H) passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal under Section 35F of Central Excises and Salt...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEngineering Systems (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Karnataka
Nov-29-1990
Excise
Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 33 and 35F; Central Excises Rules, 1944 - Rules 4 and 5
1991(33)ECC160; 1992(57)ELT12(Kar)
Shri G. Chander Kumar, Sr. Standing Counsel, ;Shri S.R. Shivaprakash and ;Shri R. Narayana, Advs.
ORDER1. In W.P. No. 3113/1986 : Petitioner is M/s. Engineering Systems (P) Ltd. The petitioner has challenged the validity and legality of the original order passed by the Additional Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore, bearing No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJohn Shalex Paints Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise ...
Karnataka
Nov-28-1989
Excise
1990(26)ECC183
Sri. Chander Kumar
ORDERS.R. Rajasekara Murthy, J.1. The petitioner is a manufacturer of paints, pigments, colours, varnishes, etc. Among the several items manufactured by the petitioner, 'Super Blucem' used as a decorative water-proof cement, is one of the items...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commissioner of Customs Vs. Agrotech Foods Ltd.
Karnataka
Aug-27-2009
Customs
Central Excise Act - Sections 11B; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 15(1), 18, 18(2), 25(2), 27, 27(2), 28 and 28C; Central Excise and Customs Laws (Amendment) Act, 1991
2010(249)ELT348(Kar)
T.M. Venkatareddy, Adv.
Aravind Kumar, J.1. The Revenue is in appeal questioning the order of the CESTAT dated 11-2-2005 passed in appeal No. C/4/2003, final order No. 213/2004 where under the Tribunal has allowed the appeal filed by the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEngineering Systems (P) Ltd. Vs. Additional Collector of Central Excis ...
Karnataka
Nov-29-1990
Excise
Central Excises and Salt Act, Sections 11A (2), 33, 24, 2 (b) 35F, 38, 5A, 11C; Rules, 1944, 173Q (1), 92, 9(2),4,5
1991(36)LC508(Karnataka)
Mr. Chander Kumar
ORDER1. In W.P. No. 3113/1986: Petitioner is M/s. Engineering Systems (P) Ltd. The petitioner has challenged the validity and legality of the original order passed by the Additional Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore, bearing No. C....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWipro Infotech Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (intel ...
Karnataka
Apr-16-1998
Sales Tax
Constitution of India - Article 366 and 366(29A); Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2 and 5B
ILR1999KAR768; [2000]120STC159(Kar)
Chander Kumar, Sr. Counsel, ;Rajesh Chander Kumar and ;S. Parthasarathi, Advs. in W.P. Nos. 13582 to 13586 of 1993, ;Ajit Kumar L. Raheja, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 18435, 18436 and 6916 of 1994 and ;M.R. Nar
ORDERP. Vishwanatha Shetty, J.1. Since the common questions of law are raised in these petitions and the contentions urged are fairly similar, all these petitions were heard together and are disposed of by this common order.2....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrecision Telecom Products Vs. Superintendent of Central Excise and or ...
Karnataka
Feb-12-1986
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 8 and 8(1)
1986(9)ECC25; 1986(24)ELT235(Kar)
D. Prakash Rao, Adv. (By Chander Kumar, Adv.)
ORDER1. M/s. Precision Telecom Products, Bangalore, which is the petitioner before us, is a partnership firm of partners engaged in the manufacture of transmitters and other components for telephones that are ultimately manufactured by the Indian...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGurupriya Tele Auto (P) Ltd. Vs. Supdt. of Central Excise
Karnataka
Aug-23-1991
Excise
Central Excise Tariff Act 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 10, 11, 52, 173B, 173B(2), 173B(9), 173C, 173G(3) and 173-I ; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4, 11A, 11A(1), 11B, 35, 35A, 35E, 35E(2) and 35EE
1992(37)ECC62; 1992(58)ELT361(Kar); ILR1992KAR605
Shri G. Chander Kumar, Adv.
ORDERShivashankar Bhat, J. 1. The petitioner is a manufacturer of the goods referred by the petitioner as 'Telephone Dial' for telephone apparatus/instrument. The question raised in this Writ Petition involves the interpretation of Section 11A of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndian Telephone Industries Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Income-tax O ...
Karnataka
Mar-21-1971
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 139, 139(1), 139(2), 143(3), 147, 148 and 271(4A)
[1972]86ITR566(KAR); [1972]86ITR566(Karn)
G. Chander Kumar, Adv.
Govinda Bhat, J. 1. The Indian Telephone Industries Co-operative Society Ltd. is the petitioner in this batch of seven writ petitions. They relate to the assessments made on the petitioner under the Income-tax Act, 1961, hereinafter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhoruka Aluminium Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Karnataka
Feb-18-1993
Excise
1993(43)ECC40; 1993LC531(Karnataka); 1993(67)ELT276(Kar); ILR1993KAR1150; 1993(2)KarLJ84
Shri G. Chander Kumar, Adv.
K.A. Swami, Acting C.J.1. This appeal is preferred against the order dated 3-2-19993 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 21339 of 1989 on the interlocutory application filed by the respondents for extension...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »