Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: c l kotecha · Page 1 of about 15 results (0.065 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 21 2000

Kamla Prasad Chourasiya Vs. PravIn Kumar JaIn and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-21-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 37, Rules 1, 1(2), 2 and 3(5); ;Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2001(5)MPHT455

Advocate for Appellant : C.L. Kotecha, Adv.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has prayed for issue of a writ of certiorari for quashment of order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 1999

Damroolal Gagannath Prasad Pathak and ors. Etc. Vs. Krishi Upaj Mandi ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-10-1999

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, 1973 - Sections 2, 2(1) and 19

Reported in : AIR2000MP15; 1999(2)MPLJ678

Advocate for Appellant : Abhay Sapre, Adv.

ORDERC.K. Prasad, J. 1. In both the Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners pray for restraining the respondents from realising market fee on 'MAIDA', contending that it is not a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 1978

Dr. Srikrishna Rajoria Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-22-1978

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1971 - Sections 341(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1978MP213

Advocate for Appellant : C.L. Kotechha, Adv.

J.S. Verma, J. 1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner Dr. Srikrishna Rajoria, a medical practitioner residing in the town of Harsud and a voter and tax-payer of Harsud...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 21 1990

Kirana Association Datia and anr. Vs. the State of M.P. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-21-1990

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 268, 357(3) and 358

Reported in : AIR1991MP58; 1991(0)MPLJ478

Advocate for Appellant : C.L. Kotecha, Adv.;R.P. Jain, Dy. Adv. General

B.C. Varma, AG. C.J.1. The challenge in this petition is to the bye-laws (Document No. 1) framed by the Datia Municipal Committee in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (3) of Section 357 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 1976

Son Singh Vs. Board of Revenue of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-27-1976

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1976MP186

Advocate for Appellant : C.L. Kotecha, Adv.

Shiv Dayal, C.J. 1. The grievance in this petition is two-fold. Firstly, that the Board of Revenue, after having held that a revision lay before the Commissioner, should have sent back the case to the Commissioner;...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 1985

Hargovind Tamrakar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-20-1985

Subject : Election

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 328

Reported in : AIR1986MP63

Advocate for Appellant : C.L. Kotecha, Adv.

C.P. Sen, J.1. The petitioner in this writ petition under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution is challenging the order dt. 17-2-1984 of the State Government passed under Section 328(6)(b) of the M. P. Municipalities...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 1993

Mst. Anjanbai and ors. Vs. Ramprasad

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-06-1993

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act, 1986 - Sections 14

Reported in : AIR1994MP91; 1994(0)MPLJ36

Advocate for Appellant : C.L. Kotecha, Adv.

P.P. Naolekar, J. 1. Facts of the case in brief are that the plaintiffs/appellants filed a suit for possession of the house as shown in Schedule 'A' situated at village Jawalpur, Petwari Halka No. 13, Tehsil...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 1981

Madhya Pradesh Ration Vikreta Sangh, Jabalpur and ors. Vs. State of Ma ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-13-1981

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(6) and 5; Madhya Pradesh Foodstuffs (Distribution) Control Order, 1960; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21 and 27; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 39, 162 and 226

Reported in : AIR1981MP203

Advocate for Appellant : V.S. Dabir, ;N.C. Jain, ;Fakhruddin and ;C.L. Kotecha, Advs.

G.P. Singh, C.J.1. This order shall also dispose of Misc. Petitions Nos. 741, 758, 759, 763, 768, 771, 774, 783,787, 796, 797, 800, 802, 803, 810, 813, 817, 831, 833, 837, 840, 844, 846, 847, 848,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 1989

Smt. Basant Kumari and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-21-1989

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1960 - Sections 11A, 11A(2), 11A(3), 11B, 41, 42, 42A and 46(1); Constitution of India - Articles 245 and 246; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1990MP160; 1990MPLJ4

Advocate for Appellant : R.N. Singh, ;N.S. Kale, ;V.S. Dabir, ;A.D. Deoras, ;R.K. Pandey, ;K.P. Munshi, ;N.C. Jain, ;R.K. Samaiya, ;Fakhruddin, ;T.C. Naik, ;R.P. Verma, ;K.L. Issrani, ;C.L. Kotecha, ;L.S. Baghel, ;S.C. Jain,

G. G. Sohani, Ag. C.J. 1. The Order in this case will also govern the disposal of Misc. Petitions Nos. 3836, 3770, 3892, 3827, 4075, 4079, 4098, 4099, 4144, 4145, 4150, 4157, 4158, 4159, 4160, 4168,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 13 1996

Abdul Sattar, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : May-13-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 260C

Reported in : [1998]230ITR163(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : B.L. Nema, Adv. in W.P. Nos. 984, 1853 and 3022 of 1995 and 1059 of 1996 and ;C.L. Kotecha, Adv. in W.P. No. 3534 of 1995

A.K. Mathur, C.J.1. All the aforesaid writ petitions involve a common question of law, therefore, they are disposed of by this common order.2. For convenient disposal of all the aforesaid writ petitions, the facts given in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial