Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: c l kapila · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.068 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 22 1970

Oberoi Clarks Vs. Excise Taxation Officer

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-22-1970

Subject : Excise

Acts : Punjab Excise Act, 1914 - Sections 58(3)

Reported in : 7(1971)DLT172

Advocate for Appellant : Sushil Malhotra and; C.L. Kapila, Advs

S. Rangarajan, J.(1) The petitioner, Oberoi Clarks Hotel, Simla, is aggrieved by the imposition of a fee of Rs. 10.000.00 in addition to the assessed fee on the liquor licenses L. 3 L 4 and L....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 1971

Raghunath Vs. Sushil Kumar

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-06-1971

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 2 and 3

Reported in : AIR1972Delhi33

Advocate for Appellant : C.L. Kapila, Adv

ORDER1. This revision petition preferred under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (Act Iii of 1949) hereinafter referred to as the Act, which was made applecable to Himachal Pradesh, is concerned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 01 1969

Nahan Foundary Limited Nahan Vs. Ram Kishan Kulwant Rai

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-01-1969

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : 5(1969)DLT545

Advocate for Appellant : C.L. Kapila and; A.C. Sud, Advs

Hardayal Hardy, J.(1) This civil revision is directedagainst the order passed by the Senior Subordinate Judge, SirmurDistrict, Nahan, on 3l-12-1969 dismissing the petitioner's applicationfor amendment of its Written-statement. The petitioner is NahanFoundry Limited Nahan which is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 09 1970

Madho and ors. Vs. Kaka Ram and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-09-1970

Subject : Property

Acts : Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estate and Land Reform Act, 1953 - Sections 26; Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estate and Land Reform Act, 1953 - Rule 13

Reported in : 6(1970)DLT356

Advocate for Appellant : Chabildas and; C.L. Kapila, Advs

Om Parkash, J.(1) This is an appeal against an order of the learned District Judge, Sirmur District, whereby he allowed an appeal against the order of the Compensation Officer. The land, measuring 99 Bighas and 8...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 1969

Bakhshi Ram and ors. Vs. Durga Dass and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-24-1969

Subject : Property

Acts : Punjab Preemption Act, 1913 - Sections 8(2)

Reported in : ILR1970Delhi217

Advocate for Appellant : R. Sachar,; C.L. Kapila and; P.N. Nag, Advs

Prakash Narain, J.(1) This second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of the Senior Subordinate Judge. Kangra at Dharamsala. whereby the appellants' appeal against the dismissal of their suit turn possession based on a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 1972

The State of Himachal Pradesh and anr. Vs. H.S. Sobti and Co.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-25-1972

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 39(1)

Reported in : AIR1973HP1

Advocate for Appellant : C.L. Kapila, Adv.

R.S. Pathak, C.J.1. This appeal is directed against the order of our brother Chet Ram Thakur granting an Interim injunction during the pendency of an application under Section 20 of the Indian Arbitration Act.2. The respondent....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 1953

Sant Ram Vs. the State

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-09-1953

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 164, 211, 211(1), 213, 225, 289(1), 342, 364, 364(2), 533 and 537; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 380 and 392; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 24

Reported in : AIR1953HP105

Advocate for Appellant : Paras Ram, Adv.

Chowdhry, J.C. 1. This is an appeal by one Sant Ram, aged 22, of village Droh in Kangra district against his conviction by the learned Sessions Judge, Sirmur, for offences punishable under Section s 302 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial