Advanced Search Results
Uma Datt Vs. R.K. Sardana and anr.
Delhi
Apr-28-1969
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(2), 47, 104 and 115 - Order 21, Rules 54, 66, 67, 68 and 90 - Order 43, Rule 1
AIR1970Delhi56
Bikramjit Nayar, Adv
1. This appeal purporting to be filed under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure, arises out of an order made in execution proceedings on objections raised by the judgment-debtor under O. 21, R. 90...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSepoy Lakhbir Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Apr-03-2002
Service
Army Act - Sections 34 to 68, 71, 72, 73 and 164(1) and (2); Army Rules - Rule 115(2)
2002IVAD(Delhi)265; 2002(64)DRJ810
Bikramjit Nayyar, Adv
Vijender Jain, J.1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition aggrieved by the order of summary court martial dated 3.1.92, awarding six months imprisonment and dismissal from service. Mr. Bikramjit Nayar counsel for the petitioner has...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Kumar Vs. Harish Kumar and anr.
Delhi
Nov-28-1967
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 29 and 43A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Article 227
4(1968)DLT74
B.J. Nayar and; Shyam Kishore, Advs
I.D. Dua, C.J. (1) Harish Kumar and his brtohers applied in the Court of the Rent Controller for the eviction of Ram Kumar and his brtoher Ram Krishan on the grounds of (i) default in payment...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Raj Kumar Vs. Harish Kumar and ors.
Delhi
Nov-22-1967
Tenancy
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 38 and 39; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106
4(1968)DLT488
B.J. Nayar and; Shyam Kishore, Advs
I.D. Dua, J. (1) Harish Kumar and his brtoher applied in the Court of Rent Controller for the eviction- of Ram Kumar and his brtoher Ram Kishan on the grounds of (i) default in payment of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLajpat Rai Vs. Usha Rani
Delhi
Feb-18-1980
CivilProperty
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17
1980RLR478
Bikramjit Nayar,; Y.K. Jain and; Usha Kumari, Advs
B.N. Kirpal, J.(1) The Civil Revision has been filed against the order dated 26th October, 1977 whereby Shri Ajit Bharihere, Sub-Judge 1st Class, Delhi had dismissed the petitioner-defendant's application under Order 18 Rule 17-A of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJai Kishan Mehta Vs. Ram Prashad
Delhi
Jul-31-1995
Contract
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39; Evidence Act - Sections 61; Specific Relief Act - Sections 13(1)
1996RLR77
Ishwar Sahai,; Rajesh Goel and; Bikramjit Nayar, Advs
R.C. Lahoti, J.(1) [ED facts : Parties entered into an agreement of sale of suit house on 14.10.77 for Rs. 40,000.00. Plaintiff paid Rs. 36,000.00 and balance was payable at the time of registration of sale...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew Delhi Municipal Committee Vs. the Life Insurance Corporation of In ...
Supreme Court of India
Aug-09-1977
Municipal Tax
Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 - Sections 66, 67 and 68A
AIR1977SC2134; 1994(4)SCALE390; (1977)4SCC84; [1978]1SCR279
F.S. Nariman,; Bikramjit Nayar,; B.P. Maheshwari and;
Y.V. Chandrachud, J.1. These appeals, by a certificate of fitness granted by the Delhi High Court, arise out of a common judgment dated March 27, 1973 given by the High Court in writ petitions filed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew Delhi Municipal Committee Vs. Raj Kumar Sharma
Delhi
Mar-21-1975
CriminalFood Adulteration
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act - Sections 10(7)
1975CriLJ1601; 1975RLR303
Bikramjit Nayar and; M.T. Siddique, Advs
Jagjit Singh, J. (1) In the Chanakya Cinema building, New Delhi, there is a snack bar. On January 27, 1971 Food Inspector R. C. Kapoor of the New Delhi Municipal Committee took a sample of milk...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDelhi Guest Houses Vs. New Delhi Municipal Corporation
Delhi
Dec-21-1973
Property
Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 - Sections 193
1974RLR267
S.N. Marwah and; Bikramjit Nayar, Advs
D.K. Kapur, J.(1) (THERE was shortage of good hotel accommodation and the Governmenit encouraged the construction of same. The D.D.A. passed a resolution on 24-12-70, that request for setting up a hotel should first be scrutinised...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVinod Kumar Mehta and ors. Vs. Haryana Financial Corporation and ors.
Delhi
Sep-10-2003
Civil
Haryana Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979 - Sections 2 , 3, 3(2)and 3(3); State Financial Corporations Act, 1951; Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 - Sections 52 (2); Constitution of India - Article 226(2)
2003VIIAD(Delhi)218; I(2004)BC169; [2005]128CompCas772(Delhi); 107(2003)DLT366; 2003(71)DRJ348
Bikramjit Nayar, Adv
Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for a writ of certiorari for quashing impugned notices dated 02.07.1998 issued by the respondent No. 2 (Assistant Collector, Grade-I/II, 37, Tughlakabad...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›