Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: bharat vyas · Page 1 of about 58 results (0.062 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 17 1989

Kana Ram and Etc. Etc. Vs. the Regional Transport Authority and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-17-1989

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 45, 45(1), 46, 47, 48, 57, 63(3A), 63(3B), 68(D) and 68

Reported in : AIR1990Raj143; 1989WLN(UC)373

Advocate for Appellant : Bharat Vyas,; S.M. Mehta,; O.P. Sharma,;

M.B. Sharma, J. 1. This order will dispose of this writ petition as well as the identical writ petitions detailed in Schedule annexed to this order*.2. Before we take up the facts of Kana v. R.T.A....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2008

Eih Associated Hotels Limited Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-29-2008

Subject : Property

Reported in : RLW2009(2)Raj1830

Advocate for Appellant : Km. Learned Counsel

Prem Shanker Asopa, J.1. By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the judgment dated 9.6.2006 (Anx.16) passed by the Jaipur Development Authority Appellate Tribunal (in short the 'Tribunal') whereby Reference No. 107/2006 filed by the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 10 2008

Mohan Lal Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-10-2008

Subject : Property

Reported in : RLW2009(2)Raj1657

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Bapna

Narayan Roy, C.J.1. Heard counsel for the parties.2. The writ petitioner, who is said to be a public spirited person, filed this P1L application raising a grievance that the State Government had decided to allot 47073...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 14 1999

Board of Technical Education and anr. Vs. Anupama Goyal and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-14-1999

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : AIR1999Raj280; 1999(3)WLC377

Advocate for Appellant : Bharat Vyas, Adv.

R.R. Yadav, J.1. By filing this Special Appeal, the appellants question the legality and propriety of the order dated 23-11-98 passed by the learned single Judge of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1665...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2002

Society (Association) of Rajasthan Institutes of Management of Science ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-07-2002

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; All India Council of Technical Education Act, 1987 - Sections 10; Adminission in Professional Colleges) Regulations, 1994 - Regulation 3

Reported in : AIR2002Raj175; 2002(5)WLN161

Advocate for Appellant : Bharat Vyas, Adv.

Shiv Kumar Sharma, J. 1. The petitioner is an association of societies registered under the Societies Registration Act. The members of petitioner society are professional colleges imparting education in the field of Management sciences. In the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2003

Prithvi Raj Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-01-2003

Subject : Election

Acts : Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 38, 38(1) and 38(4); Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996 - Rule 22

Reported in : RLW2003(4)Raj2659

Advocate for Appellant : Bharat Vyas, Adv.

Misra, J.1. The petitioner is a Zila Pramukh of District Sawaimadhopur who has challenged the order of suspension passed against him by the respondent-State on 15th January, 2003 as contained in Annexure-9.2. It was submitted by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2005

N.S. Sisodia Vs. Ashok Kumar Bansal

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-06-2005

Subject : Contempt of CourtProperty

Acts : Rajasthan Land Revenue (Saline Areas Allotment) Rules, 1970

Reported in : RLW2006(1)Raj703; 2006(2)WLC81

Advocate for Appellant : Bharat Vyas, Additional Adv. General

Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. While deciding contempt petition learned Single Judge directed the appellant thus--Either allot saline plot within one month to Shri Ashok Kumar BansalAdvocate, or suffer civil jail for one week.It is against this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 25 2007

Girraj Goyal and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-25-2007

Subject : Environment

Reported in : RLW2007(4)Raj2875

Ashok Parihar, J.1. Hunting has been a passion for royal families. It was a pleasure sport for their entertainment, excitement and collecting trophies of wild animals and, may be, to prove their Rule over the Jungle...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 2006

Swaika Properties Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Raj. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-23-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Rajasthan Urban Imprisonment Act, 1959 - Sections 2(1), 17(1), 29 to 41, 48, 52(1), 52(2), 52(4), 52(5), 52(6) and 60A(4); Central Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11A and 17; Urban Improvement Trust Act, 1959 - Sections 52 and 60A(3); Rajasthan Urban Improvement (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1990; J.D.A. Act 1980; Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 6, 6(3) and 17A; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 126(4)

Reported in : RLW2006(2)Raj1112; 2006(2)WLC488

Advocate for Appellant : G.L. Pareek, Sr. Adv.,; R.K. Agarwal and; Ashwani Chob

Vineet Kothari, J.1. By this writ petition, petitioner No. 1, Sawaika Property Private Limited, a private limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 in Calcutta and petitioner No. 2, Chairman of the Company, has challenged...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2004

Ranveer Singh and ors. Vs. Regional Transport Authority

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-12-2004

Subject : InsuranceMotor Vehicles

Reported in : I(2005)ACC423; 2004(4)WLC607

ORDERK.S. Rathore, J.1. The aforesaid writ petitions are similar in nature and common question of law is involved in the writ petitions, therefore, at the request of the respective parties both the writ petitions are heard...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial