Advanced Search Results

Subhash Dhondiba Pandit Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313; Evidence Act - Sections 6

Reported in : 1997BomCR(Cri)175; 1996CriLJ4194

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Apte, Adv.

Vishnu Sahai, J.1. The appellant aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 11th August 1982 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 81 of 1982 convicting and sentencing him to undergo seven...

Mohamed Shafi Suleman Kazi and Etc. Etc. Vs. Vilas Dhondu Kavishwar an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 300

Reported in : AIR1982Bom27

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Apte, Adv.

Deshpande, J.1to 5. x x x 6. Shri M.R. Kotwal, the learned Government Pleader, appearing for the appellant State. Sprat from challenging the finding as to negligence of Defendent No. 1 contended that running of hospitals...

Lt. Col. Ravindranath H. Hiramath Vs. Prashantkumar Buttan

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilCommercial

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13-A-2 and 6(4); Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 2(19)(a)

Reported in : 1994(4)BomCR445; (1994)96BOMLR346; 1994(2)MhLJ1731

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Apte, Adv.

M.L. Dudhat, J.1. This civil revision application along with Civil Revision Application Nos. 456 of 1990, 4618 of 1990 and 608 of 1989 are tagged together as there is a common question of law as to...

Shankar Ragnath Kulkarni Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Bombay Paragana and Kulkarni Watan Abolition Act, 1950 - Sections 2, 4, 8 and 15(1); Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 - Sections 32

Reported in : 1994(2)BomCR607

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Apte, Adv.

V.A. Mohta, J.1. Question is whether the suit lands were 'Watan Lands' as defined under section 2(h) of the Bombay Paragana and Kulkarni Watan (Abolition) Act, 1950 (the Abolition Act) on or before 1st February 1951...

Ramkrishna Girishchandra Dode and Others Vs. Anand Govind Kelkar and O ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : TenancyProperty

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 12, 13, 14, 15-A, and 28; Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rules 11(2) and 97 - Order 40, Rule 1; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105 and 108; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45, 47, 67 and 73; Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Protection Act, 1955

Reported in : 1998(4)ALLMR491; 1999(1)BomCR63

Advocate for Appellant : S.M. Paranjape, ;B.P. Apte, ;A.K. Abhyankar and ;Vhatkar, Advs.

ORDERA.V. Savant, J.1. Heard all the learned Counsel; Shri B.P Apte, Addl. Advocate General, Shri A.K. Abhyankar, Shri S.M. Paranjape and Shri Vhatkar for the petitioners and Shri V.A. Thorat for the respondents. 2. Writ Petition...

Menon and Menon Ltd Vs. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : Counsel for the Appellant: B. P. Apte, Sr. Advocate along with Bhupender Yadav, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents: Ravi Prakash and Vikrant Gumare for MSEDCL, Advocates.

1) Heard. 2) The present appeal is against the order dated 06.05.08 in Case No. 96 of 2007, passed by the Maharashtra State Electricity Regulatory Commission, the Commission for short. The Case No. 96 of 2007...

Jagdishchandra Popatlal Dodhiwala Vs. Khandesh Education Society and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 56-A; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : AIR1981Bom26; 1980MhLJ306

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Apte, Adv.

ORDER1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenges the order passed by the learned Assistant Judge, Dhule, below Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 6 of 1978 preferred by the Board of Trustees of a public...

Shridhar Dada Kate (Dr.) Vs. Usha Shridhar Kate

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1A) and 23

Reported in : 1986(3)BomCR676; 1987MhLJ81

Advocate for Appellant : M.L. Dudhat and ;Pramod N. Joshi, Advs.

Sharad Manohar, J.1. This is a petition for divorce filed by the petitioner/husband (who was the petitioner also in the trial Court, but was the respondent in the earlier matrimonial proceedings between the same parties).For the...

Nachane Ashiwni Shivram and ors. Etc. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 162, 226, 371 and 371(2); Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 61, 63, 64, 461 and 463; Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 - Sections 5(15), 5(60) and 65

Reported in : 1997(4)ALLMR602; 1997(3)BomCR680; (1997)4BOMLR556; 1998(2)MhLj234

Advocate for Appellant : M.M. Vashi, ;S.V. Sadavarte, ;G.B. Lohiya, ;A.V. Mohta, ;Pradeep Deshmukh, ;A.V. Anturkar, ;M.L. Patil, ;T.S. Ingole, ;R.S. Apte, ;C.S. Dharmadhikari, ;Sunil V. Manohar, ;E.P. Bharucha and ;M.B. Rao,

Ashok Agarwal, J.1. A Division Bench at Bombay is not ad idem with the views expressed by similar Benches, one at Nagpur and the other at Aurangabad. The Honourable the Chief Justice has, in the circumstances,...

Miraj Kamgar Union and anr. Vs. Miraj Kamgar Parishad Through the Chie ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1965 - Sections 76; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28

Reported in : 1982(1)BomCR920

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Kulkarni, Adv.

V.S. Deshpande, C.J.1. This is a petition filed by Miraj Kamgar Union. The Union represents the workmen of the Miraj Municipal Council (hereinafter referred to as 'Municipal Council'). There were disputes between the workmen and the...