Advanced Search Results
Suratram Vs. the Addl. District Development Officer, Ajmer and ors.
Rajasthan
Feb-20-1979
Constitution
Constitution of India - Article 226(1); Rajasthan Panchayat Act, 1953 - Sections 19; Rajasthan Panchayat Rules - Rule 15
AIR1979Raj186
B.P. Agarwal and; K.K. Sharma, Advs.
ORDERG.M. Lodha, J. 1. This writ petition provides a typical example of attempt of an undemocratic Sarpanch to flout majority verdict on the heels of legal technicalities. 2. Before I proceed to give the facts of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Shanti Devi (Since Dead Represented by L.Rs.) and ors. Vs. Ram Na ...
Rajasthan
Mar-12-2004
PropertyCivil
Muslim Law; Jaipur Laws Act, 1923 - Sections 3; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 27; Constitution of India - Article 141
AIR2004Raj232; 2004(3)WLC85
B.P. Agarwal, Sr. Adv. and; R.P. Agarwal, Adv.
Shiv Kumar Sharma, J.1. This Special Appeal, preferred by defendant appellants, arises out of the judgment and decree dated November 9, 1984 of the learned single Judge whereby Civil Regular First Appeal of the plaintiff respondents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKamani Engineering Corporation Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Rajasthan
Sep-26-1996
Limitation
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 11 and 173J; Constitution of India - Article 226; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11B
2003(159)ELT125(Raj)
B.P. Agarwal, Adv.
M.P. Singh, J.1. The petitioner has claimed the refund of the excise duty wrongly recovered under Item No. 26-AA(ia) of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944 ('the Act No. 1 of 1944')2. The petitioner is...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rajasthan Central Stores (P) Ltd. Vs. Cit
Rajasthan
Jul-09-2002
Direct Taxation
(2002)176CTR(Raj)616
B.P. Agarwal, for the Assessee J.K. Singh & Anuroop Singhi, for the Revenue
By the CourtOn an application filed under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal has referred the following question :'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.D.P.L. Vs. Sony Steels
Delhi
Jan-08-2014
Land Acquisition
Mr. Vikram Nandarajog, Mr. Sushil Jaswal, Mr. Ujjwal K. Jha, Mr. B.P. Agarwal
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI R-6 & 7 + CRL.A. 57 of 2008 N.D.P.L. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Vikram Nandarajog and Mr. Sushil Jaswal, Advocates versus SONY STEELS Through: ........
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAditya Gupta vs.tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd.
Delhi
May-30-2017
Land Acquisition
Mr. Ujjwal Kumar Jha, Mr. B.P. Agarwal
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 30, 2017 W.P.(C) 4984/2017 & C.M.21514/2017 ADITYA GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ujjwal Kumar Jha and Mr. B.P. Agarwal, Advocates versus...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahesh Kumar Vs. State
Allahabad
Aug-01-2001
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 1, 8, 32, 32(1), 113-B and 114; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 201, 304-B and 498-A
2001CriLJ4417
Shiv Nath Singh and ;V.S. Singh, Advs.
U.S. Tripathi, J.1. Appellant Mahesh Kumar has preferred this appeal against the Judgment and order dated 8-2-1991 passed by 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Kanpur Dehat in S.T. No. 198 of 1988 convicting the appellant under Sections...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGyasi Ram Vs. Ram Chandra Singh
Allahabad
Jul-06-1977
Tenancy
Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 106, 107 and 111; Uttar Pradesh (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947 - Sections 3 and 3(1); ;Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildigs (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 29A
AIR1978All376
Prakash Gupta, Adv.
M.P. Mehrotra, J.1. This is the defendant's second appeal arising out of a suit for the tenant's eviction filed by the landlord after determining the former's tenancy. The brief facts are these: The plaintiff claimed to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNorth Delhi Power Limited ( Now Known as Tata Power Delhi Distribution ...
Delhi
Jul-17-2018
Education
Mr. Manish Srivastav, Mr. Ankit Agrawal, Mr. Adib K. Khan
* % + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h July, 2018 EX.S.A. 4/2014 & CM No.9650/2014 (for stay). NORTH DELHI POWER LIMITED ( NOW KNOWN AS TATA POWER...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHindustan Motors Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise and
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Dec-28-1983
Excise
(1984)(16)ELT647Tri(Kol.)kata
1. Hindustan Motors Ltd., P.O. Hindmotor, Dist. Hooghly, West Bengal has filed an appeal being aggrieved from Order No. 13/WB/83, dated 9th March, 1983 passed by the Collector (Appeals), Calcutta.2. Briefly the facts are that the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »